Overhyped nonsense.
You won't learn a thing from this drivel. Suchet swans about with a couple of writers and a gardener as they babble on about Christie without adding a penny's worth of information to what we already know.
The photo of the 4- or 5-year-old girl with a dog is clearly closer to 10. The handwritten stuff from a 4- or 5-year-old girl clearly is not from a kid of that age. It's all faked.
The visit to the artist who never met Christie is a waste of time.
They gloss over her work as a chemist's assistant and use of poisons in her books. THAT might have been interesting, but instead they visit a gardener who yaps on about peach and cherry pits. And? The connection to Christie is what?
Basically this ends up as a travelogue ... and a boring one at that.
You won't learn a thing from this drivel. Suchet swans about with a couple of writers and a gardener as they babble on about Christie without adding a penny's worth of information to what we already know.
The photo of the 4- or 5-year-old girl with a dog is clearly closer to 10. The handwritten stuff from a 4- or 5-year-old girl clearly is not from a kid of that age. It's all faked.
The visit to the artist who never met Christie is a waste of time.
They gloss over her work as a chemist's assistant and use of poisons in her books. THAT might have been interesting, but instead they visit a gardener who yaps on about peach and cherry pits. And? The connection to Christie is what?
Basically this ends up as a travelogue ... and a boring one at that.