Dakota Fanning and Elizabeth Olsen became very good friends after this film was done. Boyt and Lizzy dated and even became engaged.
That's the best thing we can say about this flick.
Was it a contract obligation for Richard Dreyfus?(who character death was made so out of nowhere that made me feel like any other unknown actor could be on that burial, not the legendary Richard Dreyfus).
Boyd also portrayed a character that bored most. His reactions to Dakota's character demeaming was very artificial, to say the the least.
Well, it is one of the first movies of Lizzie Olsen. Not she was unexperienced or untrained. She spent her youth from 16 to 22 years old commited with theater schools and college degree in drama. But also "our Wanda Maxmoff" delivered an artificial experience to the audience.
Dakota's character, for other while, seem ok. Her character saw her father cheating her mother on the day sight. Her mother, portrayed soberly by Ellen Barkin, had a weird but stoic reaction to not fall apart because of it , even so she call out the cheatter move out the house.
Even said that, i don't think there isn't enough conflict to justify any of the actions of the movie unless teenager lust are your move and mood.
But, even so, there are better examples of "teenage in a lust mode cliche" like Chloë Moretz's "Miseducation of Cameron Post" where the teachler character(portrayed by Chloë) was sent to a convertion camp after a brief sexual encount with another girl. That's a big conflic even for today's patterns(the movie was characterized as a 90's era movie)
What happens to Dakota's character?
Just a small biff with Lizzy's character and the movie was done.
What a difference?
I think the only bait of the movie was the 1st scene where Lizzy and Dakota appears almost naked on the beach.
And that's it.
You will spare your time just taking a look to this scene on the web and not watching this hole movie. A terrible waste a a good cast.
That's the best thing we can say about this flick.
Was it a contract obligation for Richard Dreyfus?(who character death was made so out of nowhere that made me feel like any other unknown actor could be on that burial, not the legendary Richard Dreyfus).
Boyd also portrayed a character that bored most. His reactions to Dakota's character demeaming was very artificial, to say the the least.
Well, it is one of the first movies of Lizzie Olsen. Not she was unexperienced or untrained. She spent her youth from 16 to 22 years old commited with theater schools and college degree in drama. But also "our Wanda Maxmoff" delivered an artificial experience to the audience.
Dakota's character, for other while, seem ok. Her character saw her father cheating her mother on the day sight. Her mother, portrayed soberly by Ellen Barkin, had a weird but stoic reaction to not fall apart because of it , even so she call out the cheatter move out the house.
Even said that, i don't think there isn't enough conflict to justify any of the actions of the movie unless teenager lust are your move and mood.
But, even so, there are better examples of "teenage in a lust mode cliche" like Chloë Moretz's "Miseducation of Cameron Post" where the teachler character(portrayed by Chloë) was sent to a convertion camp after a brief sexual encount with another girl. That's a big conflic even for today's patterns(the movie was characterized as a 90's era movie)
What happens to Dakota's character?
Just a small biff with Lizzy's character and the movie was done.
What a difference?
I think the only bait of the movie was the 1st scene where Lizzy and Dakota appears almost naked on the beach.
And that's it.
You will spare your time just taking a look to this scene on the web and not watching this hole movie. A terrible waste a a good cast.