On the whole, the 105-minutes presents an impartial documentary on procedures leading up to Hollywood's post-war blacklist, along with later commentary from many of those involved. The first part is spent on footage from congressional committee's investigations of 1947 headed up by Parnell Thomas. It was from these hearings, rather than Sen. McCarthy's controversial probes of the early 50's, that the Hollywood purges were ignited.
Actually, as the docu points out, the blacklisting itself was initiated by studio moguls at a 1947 meeting at the Waldorf Astoria in NYC. There the moneymen were understandably concerned with audience fallout from what the hearings had revealed. After all, the Cold War was just then heating up, and commies had now replaced fascists as the official enemy. So a number of movie pro's were caught in the sudden switchover. Then too, many of the same lefties were active in efforts to unionize studio craft workers, also bitterly battled by the moguls. So the stage was set.
The second part focuses mainly on interviews with "The Hollywood 10", including Trumbo, Cole, Dmytryk, et. al, along with adversaries like Reagan and Wheeler. These are illuminating given the 20-some years that had passed since the blacklisting events. It's these interviews, that, unlike the first part, are not found anywhere else, at least that I've seen. On the whole, there's very little voice-over narration, more of which at times might have been helpful in tying parts together.
All in all, the assembled footage presents a live glimpse of a controversial period in America's political life. And perhaps just as importantly, without clear partisanship, though the interviews are weighted towards those who lost their jobs as a result of the process. Thus the film's essential viewing for those concerned with constitutional principles when these are put to the dramatic test.
Actually, as the docu points out, the blacklisting itself was initiated by studio moguls at a 1947 meeting at the Waldorf Astoria in NYC. There the moneymen were understandably concerned with audience fallout from what the hearings had revealed. After all, the Cold War was just then heating up, and commies had now replaced fascists as the official enemy. So a number of movie pro's were caught in the sudden switchover. Then too, many of the same lefties were active in efforts to unionize studio craft workers, also bitterly battled by the moguls. So the stage was set.
The second part focuses mainly on interviews with "The Hollywood 10", including Trumbo, Cole, Dmytryk, et. al, along with adversaries like Reagan and Wheeler. These are illuminating given the 20-some years that had passed since the blacklisting events. It's these interviews, that, unlike the first part, are not found anywhere else, at least that I've seen. On the whole, there's very little voice-over narration, more of which at times might have been helpful in tying parts together.
All in all, the assembled footage presents a live glimpse of a controversial period in America's political life. And perhaps just as importantly, without clear partisanship, though the interviews are weighted towards those who lost their jobs as a result of the process. Thus the film's essential viewing for those concerned with constitutional principles when these are put to the dramatic test.