6/10
The Problem With Return of the Living Dead Sequels
22 August 2018
Just like Necropolis and Rave to the Grave, Return of the Living Dead Part II would have been a decent film if it wasn't a sequel to the original. There was a balance between existential horror and comedy in the original that is clearly lacking in its descendants. I wish Russo had been involved, but he's no longer in his prime (Children of the Living Dead was cringe-worthy bad).

Return of the Living Dead itself is a sequel to Night of the Living Dead. We zombie-flick aficionados remember that Romero and Russo took their ideas in different directions. Unfortunately, Part II is almost like watching a goofier re-imagining of Russo's Return of the Living Dead, even though it is meant to be a sequel. Return of the Living Dead Part II is a family-friendly version that would have succeeded on its own merits, but fails to achieve the balancing act that its predecessor made look easy. Classic eighties.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed