1920 London (2016)
3/10
'Jab jab bhoot hasaa, tab mai bhi hasaa' i.e. every time the ghost laughed, i laughed as well. :D
6 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This movie represents Indian Film Industry as immature and imperfect.

The starting storyline of the movie is not descriptive enough and you ask yourself 'Why should i watch the movie further, if i don't feel connected to the main characters?'

My another astonishment - Jai (Sherman Joshi) lives in a worn out hut but wears the latest updated fashion of 21st century! I wanna ask, where in India, the 1920's, did he get his coat dry cleaned? And how did he pay for the dry cleaning service?? (He never took any money from his clients calling it social service)

Let's come to the branding. The movie is a mixture of scenes and ideas copied from Hollywood movies such as, 'The Exorcist', 'The exorcism of emily rose', 'The Conjuring', 'The Ring' and maybe more i don't recall all of 'em.

.....which goes bad on the image of Indian Film Industry.....being released in foreign countries like U.S.A etc.

The only thing I can remember original to this movie is bad animation. Example,

the whole scene with ship to London, turns out to be more close to Cartoon Animation films we've watched as kids on Cartoon Network and all.

So, I doubt they've even been to London and actually, shot out the sets on hill stations.

Meera Chopra's Acting is monotonous. Every time she gets scared, the intensity of expressions on her face is the same.

Expecting box office collections due to the previous image(of 1st part) of '1920 series' is foolery. Deception to public's trust.

The final impression this movie had on my mind,

'Jab jab bhoot hasaa, tab mai bhi hasaa' i.e. every time the ghost laughed, i laughed as well. :D
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed