6/10
good,but not good enough
10 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a second proof to the fact that "just because you worked with James wan doesn't mean you can direct a movie like James wan.John R Leonetti learned that by directing "annabelle".It wasn't a poor movie though,but it is nothing compared to "the conjuring".The situation is nothing different in Insidious 3.But first lets discuss the positives.Leigh Whannell,being the writer for the first 2 movies,did nothing wrong with the plot or screenplay.The actors too did a decent job,and Stephanie and Linshaye were exceptional.Joseph Bishara was his usual best,but he too cannot save the movie's cause that flawed so badly in the jump scares.The scares were so predictable that i was guessing every time "OK there is going to be a scare here",and guess what!!! i was right almost every time.even "annabelle" was better in that area,though they were few in number.I really missed James wan in this movie,who is a real master in that department.U can never guess when or where the scares would come.And the demon,geez,whannell cant u come up with something better or more terrifying than that!!!! Do u expect us to get freaked out by seeing a man with a breathing mask and with feet covered with blood!!!! Overall,it is a decent attempt by Leigh Whannell but Insidious 1 stands too tall in front of insidious chapter 3
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed