3/10
6.8? How?
11 October 2014
I have seen that this movie did not cost much to make, and it is startlingly obvious from the get- go. I'm not saying that films have to cost £100 million to be good, of course not, but to say this film is good, just because it was cheap, is very misleading.

There is no conviction in any part. The acting is amateurish at best. The English "accent" is terrible and it feels like the actors hadn't met before the scenes were shot. The script is tired and unoriginal. You don't get a sense of togetherness or camaraderie and I have seen better acting in Home and Away. There is cliché after cliché, I was so disappointed. When the American says he can speak German, it is so funny. Bitte and danke with the biggest American accent you have ever heard. Then the "British" guy enters the fray. Wow. If this wasn't written by Americans who have never been to England, or met a British person, then I would be entirely surprised.

I like war movies, I really do, but this was tedious, contrived, clichéd and boring. How it even got one million dollars of funding is beneath me. I would have saved up and spent the money on a project that was much more worthwhile!
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed