Overall an enjoyable piece, it benefited greatly by Plympton's work (and dwelled on that a few times) and was hindered by some clunky editing and limited camera coverage.
Ideally I would have liked to see two cameras on the interviews. Using the backdrop of the Plymptoons was interesting but it was essentially the same thing over and over and over. It was a treat to see Ralph Bakshi but was surprised what little there was with Lloyd Kaufman.
Although I personally find very little to be critical about when it comes to Plympton's films, I was a bit surprised that it wasn't more in- depth and critical. Nothing really personal about the man. I was wondering if he was heterosexual or gay. Another reviewer has suggested the one critic of Plympton was a fake. I would hope so since that guy was relatively foolish. But there has to be others to feature that would be touchy about his work.
For me, the editing at times was clunky. A couple times the flow of the interviews was interview-breath-interview instead of a better flow of such. Specifically I don't know why the home movies weren't cropped as there were strange green lines on the side of the screen. Also the "How to make a movie" segment was actually very little on that subject.
I would have also liked to see the details of Plympton's "business". How he makes his money and how his films are seen. How he gets by especially in the face to monoliths like Disney and Pixar.
But I wasn't there. I don't know what resources and access were available to the director. For the fans of Plympton, it was preachin' to the choir. But being that the man is in a niche business, I'm not sure there was much interesting to a person who generally enjoys documentaries and not specifically Plympton.
Ideally I would have liked to see two cameras on the interviews. Using the backdrop of the Plymptoons was interesting but it was essentially the same thing over and over and over. It was a treat to see Ralph Bakshi but was surprised what little there was with Lloyd Kaufman.
Although I personally find very little to be critical about when it comes to Plympton's films, I was a bit surprised that it wasn't more in- depth and critical. Nothing really personal about the man. I was wondering if he was heterosexual or gay. Another reviewer has suggested the one critic of Plympton was a fake. I would hope so since that guy was relatively foolish. But there has to be others to feature that would be touchy about his work.
For me, the editing at times was clunky. A couple times the flow of the interviews was interview-breath-interview instead of a better flow of such. Specifically I don't know why the home movies weren't cropped as there were strange green lines on the side of the screen. Also the "How to make a movie" segment was actually very little on that subject.
I would have also liked to see the details of Plympton's "business". How he makes his money and how his films are seen. How he gets by especially in the face to monoliths like Disney and Pixar.
But I wasn't there. I don't know what resources and access were available to the director. For the fans of Plympton, it was preachin' to the choir. But being that the man is in a niche business, I'm not sure there was much interesting to a person who generally enjoys documentaries and not specifically Plympton.