$207M budget, and all I get is bunch of CGI sequences? Come on... XXXL Gorilla was superb, I admit, perfectly flawless, but still it doesn't answer my question - how on earth they spent all the two hundred millions of dollars making this flick?! I think its insane that people dare to spent that much money on a stupid films like this. O tempora, o mores...
This flick should have been dumbed-down even more and made rated G, because as it is now it is not a movie for adults, and it is not for children either. Complete failure of directing, with lack of adequate screen writing talent as well.
Original King Kong in 1933 was freightening and daring for its times. This cold turkey is as mellow as war scenes on CNN, and even though it has way better top-of-the-art video fx compared to old 1933 sucker, its not even as half groundbreaking as the old original was back then.
Its not my monies, but I am really curious: where the hell they spent all these monies it supposedly cost?
This flick should have been dumbed-down even more and made rated G, because as it is now it is not a movie for adults, and it is not for children either. Complete failure of directing, with lack of adequate screen writing talent as well.
Original King Kong in 1933 was freightening and daring for its times. This cold turkey is as mellow as war scenes on CNN, and even though it has way better top-of-the-art video fx compared to old 1933 sucker, its not even as half groundbreaking as the old original was back then.
Its not my monies, but I am really curious: where the hell they spent all these monies it supposedly cost?