Not since "Fahrenheit 9/11" have I seen such bombastic, utterly laughable garbage purporting to be "truth".
Through the use of obviously doctored video, mysterious audio added to video, and statements taken out of context, host von Kleist attempts to hook the viewer into believing that 9/11 was all a big government "plot", "conspiracy", "scheme", "shell game", etc.
A "pod" on UAL Flight 175? Nope. Try the shadow of the right engine since the sun was shining in that direction.
A "flash" upon impact? Sorry. Metal on metal sparking and/or video enhancement.
An explosion at the base of WTC 2 BEFORE the collapse? Obviously doctored video since if you look at what is supposed to be the south tower it has the same exact damage as the north tower. (But I believe von Kleist said this was due to a video "glitch" in his "director's" cut. How convenient. ) No windows on the plane? How far away was the viewer and how long did they have to see the plane before it hit? Being a pilot I know from experience that at 500mph and close to a mile away you can't discern much detail on an aircraft. And considering that airliner windows are less than a foot square this would be consistent. Go out to an airport someday and park about a half-mile from the approach path and watch the airliners come in. See how much detail you can actually see. Anyone who bothered to look for photos of the second plane will find them with the UAL logo on the tail and UAL's paint scheme.
No other security camera footage at the Pentagon? It obviously didn't occur to von Kleist or his handlers that the Pentagon is a high security building and providing footage from other cameras would have compromised security by revealing their location.
"Pull" the building? Nowhere on the video is the use of this term explained. It's taken completely out of context.
As for WTC 7? Watch the History Channel's presentation of Greatest Engineering Disasters in their Modern Marvels series and all of this is explained. There were no preplanted explosives or any other such nonsense.
And as for the missing debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon? In this case watch the National Geographic Channel's presentation of "Seconds From Disaster: The Pentagon" for a truthful explanation.
Through the use of obviously doctored video, mysterious audio added to video, and statements taken out of context, host von Kleist attempts to hook the viewer into believing that 9/11 was all a big government "plot", "conspiracy", "scheme", "shell game", etc.
A "pod" on UAL Flight 175? Nope. Try the shadow of the right engine since the sun was shining in that direction.
A "flash" upon impact? Sorry. Metal on metal sparking and/or video enhancement.
An explosion at the base of WTC 2 BEFORE the collapse? Obviously doctored video since if you look at what is supposed to be the south tower it has the same exact damage as the north tower. (But I believe von Kleist said this was due to a video "glitch" in his "director's" cut. How convenient. ) No windows on the plane? How far away was the viewer and how long did they have to see the plane before it hit? Being a pilot I know from experience that at 500mph and close to a mile away you can't discern much detail on an aircraft. And considering that airliner windows are less than a foot square this would be consistent. Go out to an airport someday and park about a half-mile from the approach path and watch the airliners come in. See how much detail you can actually see. Anyone who bothered to look for photos of the second plane will find them with the UAL logo on the tail and UAL's paint scheme.
No other security camera footage at the Pentagon? It obviously didn't occur to von Kleist or his handlers that the Pentagon is a high security building and providing footage from other cameras would have compromised security by revealing their location.
"Pull" the building? Nowhere on the video is the use of this term explained. It's taken completely out of context.
As for WTC 7? Watch the History Channel's presentation of Greatest Engineering Disasters in their Modern Marvels series and all of this is explained. There were no preplanted explosives or any other such nonsense.
And as for the missing debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon? In this case watch the National Geographic Channel's presentation of "Seconds From Disaster: The Pentagon" for a truthful explanation.