One is used to lending one's unstinting support to the brave efforts of our film industry. This however should never be extended to support for crimes against taste and judgement.Where is the plot? Who approved the script? What happened to story structure, respect for the audience's intelligence and simple awareness of characterisation? In the immortal words of Mr G Harrison - "My Dear Lord!" - surely someone could have done better than this!
This diabolical travesty has already been condemned on this site for obvious failings perceived by all who have been stupid enough to pay to see it. That the photography and design are adequate does not raise it above contention for 'worst film in living memory'.
I do not wish to repeat what others have said, to carp about the lack of direction, or indeed to carp about the woeful dialogue or even to carp about the cringeful acting (who is guilty of telling that wooden girl she could act?), but the public have a right to be protected from this.
Be warned this film is a load of old carp.
This diabolical travesty has already been condemned on this site for obvious failings perceived by all who have been stupid enough to pay to see it. That the photography and design are adequate does not raise it above contention for 'worst film in living memory'.
I do not wish to repeat what others have said, to carp about the lack of direction, or indeed to carp about the woeful dialogue or even to carp about the cringeful acting (who is guilty of telling that wooden girl she could act?), but the public have a right to be protected from this.
Be warned this film is a load of old carp.