Reviews

9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Pleasantly surprising movie about sexual politics and love in rural north Vietnam
2 January 2006
At a screening of this film in the U.S., director Pham Nhue Giang was asked which film directors she liked and has been influenced by. She answered David Lynch, Edward Yang, Wong Kar Wai, and Sarah Silverman (!?). Of the four, the influence most in evidence here is Taiwanese director Yang, best known in the West for Yi Yi. Deserted Vally struck me as being like one of Yang's bittersweet comedies about the sexes doing a fairly dismal job of getting along with each other—sort of like A Confucian Confusion, except set an elementary school in the cloud forests of north Vietnam, rather than the executive board rooms of Taipei.

The story is primarily about two women teachers (Minh and Giao) and the man (Tanh) who is the principal at an elementary school established for the Hmong people in north Vietnam. Minh is a knockout, the sort of woman who looks great without making the slightest bit of effort at it. She looks good in just peasant clothes and her hair in a bun. Tanh is attracted to her but makes no attempt to follow up on his attraction. At one point, Giao teases him about being attracted to Minh. He laughs and says, "Minh is like jasmine. I'm like buffalo s--t." Although this may be a bit extreme, Tanh is rather drab. Nevertheless, he is a good man and obviously cares about his school. When school starts in the morning, he rings the bell to call the students and then, if some of them don't show up, he goes scampering around the countryside looking for them. At night, he gets drunk on wine and walks alone in the dark, singing a lonely song. Although he is principal, he apparently never spent much time teaching. When left as the only teacher at the school, he is at a loss for what to teach his students and tries teaching them the song he sings every night when he gets drunk. They respond by telling him that singing is boring.

Minh, meanwhile, has fallen in love with a visiting geologist on assignment, while Mi, one of Minh's older students, has her eye on the same fellow. The geologist is, as they say, a hunk. When Mi sees Minh having sex with her man in the local stream, she falls into an adolescent funk and sets about trying to turn all of the students against Minh. About this time, Minh finds out that her man has one very disappointing quality, and she's stuck with the consequences. All of this, plus a problem between Giao and Tanh, threatens to destroy the school.

Although funded by the Vietnamese Film Board, this is not your typical Marxist movie about noble teachers sacrificing for the good of their students and the Revolution. This is a movie about actual humans and their problems—problems that are not solved by a change in the economic system. Even so, there is some subtle PR going on here. The Vietnamese government is trying to establish one elementary school for each Hmong community in the north. This is an interesting switch, given that the Vietnamese government committed genocide against the Hmong after the end of the Vietnam/American War because the Hmong fought with the Americans against the communists.

Now, three decades after the end of the war, the government seems to trying to strike the right balance between allowing the Hmong to maintain their culture while at the same time educating them so that they can participate in the larger society. This is the same problem faced by the U.S. government in its relations with Native Americans after attempting its own form of genocide in the late 1800s.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bright Future (2002)
8/10
Interesting premise but the movie ultimately doesn't add up
14 April 2005
Bright Future is about a plot to populate the sewers of Tokyo with a glowing, poisonous jellyfish. So far, so good. There aren't too many movies about plots to populate the sewers of Tokyo with glowing, poisonous jellyfish that I know about. Although the movie has much to commend it, it is ultimately frustrating because characters are constantly doing things not because they make sense but because the filmmaker wants them to in order to advance the plot. Also, the movie has no real ending; it just….ends.

On the one hand, you might say that the movie doesn't have to make sense because it follows a dream logic and dreams don't always make sense. However, the best movies that follow a dream logic, such as Bunuel's The Exterminating Angel, have an internal consistency. Actions make sense within the context of the movie. Also, The Exterminating Angel has one of the best endings in all of cinema.

I liked the themes of Bright Future: loneliness, alienation, lack of connection between the generations. I also liked the poisonous jellyfish as a metaphor for disaffected, violent teenagers and 20-somethings. However, I had the feeling that the filmmaker wrote himself into a corner and didn't know how to get out of it. Japanese novelist Haruki Murakami does this with his novels. He starts a novel not knowing where it's going but then eventually has to end it, which he almost always does in an unsatisfying manner.

Nevertheless, I keep reading Murakami novels and I'm going to seek out other films by Kiyoshi Kurosawa. Maybe some day all the ingredients will fall into place and he'll make a masterpiece.
13 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sorum (2001)
An overlooked masterpiece
14 October 2004
Based on the mixed reviews that I found on the web, I wasn't expecting too much from Sorum, but I was very pleasantly surprised-although 'pleasant' isn't exactly the right word for this movie. I've included it in my unofficial list of overlooked masterpieces, including "The Third Page" by Zeki Demirkubuz, "Last Images of the Shipwreck" by Eliseo Subiela, and "Straight Through the Heart" by Doris Dörrie.

Sorum is not for everyone. The emphasis is on character development rather than shocks or special effects. The characters are not particularly likable, although I related to all of them in one way or another. The pacing is deliberate-until the end, when the various subplots snap into place to form the big picture.

Like the unfortunate author in the movie who is writing a novel about the events occurring around him, I found the ending very satisfying. You have to pay attention, though, particularly during a scene when the main character is having a haircut in a barbershop. (Unfortunately, this is when the white subtitles appear over a light background, which makes them hard to read.) When the movie ended, I was confused, but as I thought about it, the ending became clear and I started laughing, just the author before he got punched.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Distance (2001)
Can somebody explain this movie to me?
4 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Contains Spoiler!! I don't get this movie. I patiently sat through it, waiting for the punchline. There's seems to be one, but I'm not sure what it is.

Four people make an annual pilgrimage to a spot in the mountains where a cult group lived. Three years previously, the cult had put a genetically engineered virus in the water supply. The idea apparently was to kill off everyone in Japan and then repopulate it with cult members. The virus killed a few people and poisoned thousands, but instead of living and taking over, most of the cult members died.

The people making the pilgrimage are family of the deceased cult members, except for one guy, who claims to be a brother of one of the women but isn't. Who is he? What is he doing there? What's his relationship with the old man in the hospital? Why does he burn the pier at the end of the movie? If anybody out there knows, I'd appreciate it if you wrote your explanation in this comments section. For everyone else, check out Koreeda's other movies-Mabarosi or Afterlife-but skip this one.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Railroaded! (1947)
Standard issue film noir
26 March 2003
When I finally got around to seeing Anthony Mann's westerns with Jimmy Stewart and Gary Cooper, I was impressed. The film intelligentsia, such as Jonathan Rosenbaum of the `ChicagoReader,' had been praising these films for years, and they were right. These movies were more complex and interesting than your typical western.

So I figured that I'd try Mann's film noir movies from early in his career. However, if `Railroaded!' is any indication of the kind of movies he was making then, I'm not going to bother seeing any more. This movie is very predictable - almost paint-by-the-numbers. About the only unusual touch is a villain who likes to quote Oscar Wilde. In a few scenes, the direction has some flair, such as the opening burglary and a later scene when John Ireland threatens Jane Randolph. But if you want to see a good Mann film, check out `The Man from Laramie' or `Man of the West' instead.

Still, `Leave It to Beaver' fans might be amused by watching Hugh Beaumont (aka Ward Cleaver) as the detective.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lost Man (1951)
probably very confusing to people who don't speak German
7 October 2002
This is probably a good movie, but it's hard to tell because at many key moments throughout the movie it is difficult to read the subtitles. Because the movie is in black and white, white subtitles keep showing up on white background and so, unless you understand German, you only catch snatches of important conversations. This is particularly a problem in the last fifth of the movie that involves a scene in a large house where a plot to kill Hitler is being hatched (I think). What that had to do with Dr. Rothe (the Peter Lorre character) killing his fiancee and his subsequent choice about which Nazi to shoot I have yet to figure out. After the movie, I asked total strangers in the audience what was going on in that house and they didn't know either.

I suggest that any distributor who is looking to make some money from this movie should consider producing a new edition with yellow subtitles that will stand out on both black and white backgrounds. Without those, this will remain a movie that is well-known only in Germany.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie deserves much more attention than it has been getting.
1 October 2001
`Third Page' is an excellent film, a sort of Turkish cross between Fritz Lang's `Scarlet Street' and Dostoevsky's `Crime and Punishment.' Its subject matter is very dark, alleviated only by occasional black humor. If well-made, depressing movies cheer you up, you should definitely check this one out.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dirty Hands (1951)
10/10
A movie that shows that Sartre deserved his Nobel Prize.
19 September 2001
I saw this movie several years so my memory of it is a bit vague, but I remember being quite pleasantly surprised. I had figured that any movie written by Jean Paul Sartre would be about mildly depressed people sitting around making `existential' comments, but that's not the case in the three movies that I've seen by him (this one, The Chips Are Down, and The Proud Ones). His movies are fast-paced and, unlike modern American movies, unpredictable.

Dirty Hands is about a man who is part of a movement, clearly based on communism, who is recruited by his leaders to assassinate his former professor. He is conflicted about whether he should or not, since he has great respect and love for the man and yet is loyal to the cause.

I don't know that much about Sartre, but I do know that he was involved with the communists during and after World War II. I was struck by how anticommunist this movie is, not in a Joe McCarthy sense but in the way that former communists, such as Arthur Koestler and Wilhelm Reich, became disgusted with the tactics of the movement.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A touching story about a fervent ideologue who is a tad goofy
26 December 2000
This early work by Adrei Konchalovsky, best known for the Hollywood movie Runaway Train, surpasses the typical Soviet propaganda film by daring to protray its protagonist as being so ideological he's goofy. The protagonist is a Red Army veteran named Diuishen who has been sent to a godforsaken section of Kirghizia to start the first school in the region. On the first day of school, the students ask him about death, and as their teacher, Diuishen is happy to answer their questions, until a little boy innocently asks him if Lenin is going to die someday. Diuishen becomes enraged at the suggestion that his god Lenin is actually mortal and, practically yanking the little boy's arm off, accuses him of being a counter-revolutionary. The boy, of course, has absolutely no idea what Diuishen is talking about.

This incident almost derails Diuishen's plans to start a school by scaring away his students, but Diuishen calms down and the children are wise enough to see that he is offering them a new and perhaps better way of life. Although the children accept him, the adults barely tolerate his presence since they see him as a threat to their way of doing things.

The movie shows Diuishen, propelled by his ideological fanaticism, learning to be human and the townsfolk, equally fanatic in their desire to keep the outside world at bay, gradually coming to terms with inevitable change. The ending, had the movie been made in Hollywood, might have been called Capraesque, but I think it is more touching than anything Capra would have done because it doesn't hit you over the head with its emotions. Instead, they sneak up on you. The lack of music at the end is particularly fitting. Instead of a booming orchestra, there's just the sound of axes.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed