I began watching this movie expecting it to go one way and soon realized that my first impression was wrong. The acting is good. And the fact that it is based on a true story or "actual events" I find very interesting. When ever movies say that I always find myself wondering which part of the story they left out or added to to make the movie more dramatic. One thing I didn't much care for is the fact that her lawyer (played by Richard Crenna) touts himself as one who does not defend someone if he is not sure of their innocence. Yet, he agrees to represent this woman even though he questions her quilt and innocence through the whole movie. Did she do it? Or did she not? I know what I believe and for that reason I didn't much care for the ending. But you'll have to make up your own mind.
Tell Your Friends