Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
SparkShorts: Kitbull (2019)
Season 1, Episode 3
3/10
A cute concept, but lacking in nuance.
16 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I worry that this short has people too comfortable with the notion that pit bull behavior always comes down to the owner. That may be part of it, but having a good owner doesn't completely stamp out the tendencies of a dog breed that was bred to be aggressive.

I've seen and heard of pit bulls doing horrible things to people and other animals, and I would not indulge in media that reaches you to go out of your way to approach one in public, especially a stray. You don't know what a dog is like or what background it has, and it doesn't need to be involved in dogfighting to be dangerous.

I also see people suggest that the relationship between the dog and cat is more meaningful because it's a black cat in particular- as in the "black cats are unlucky" thing, but not only is that alleged superstition not as widespread as you may think, but I think we could agree that a cat being judged based on the color of its fur is quite different from a dog being judged based on conceptions about the breed.
1 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A really great show for kids, even if it does have its flukes.
14 May 2022
I've been watching this series because Strawberry Shortcake was something I was into when I was younger, and it's definitely something I would've enjoyed if it had been around back then.

Where the show shines is in its cast of main characters, its humor, and in the unique and important lessons it teaches, which usually manage to be a bit outside the scope of what you'd expect to see. For a kid's show, I think it's impressive when its resolutions are ones that I tend not to see coming.

With that said, the show flounders just a bit when it comes to worldbuilding -- which may seem petty when I'm talking about a kids' property like this. The main, recurring cast of characters are all distinct, funny, and likable, but the big-city and background characters all feel just a bit too ordinary. Supposedly, this all takes place in a world where everyone is themed after a type of desert or something, but you wouldn't glean that just by looking at the background characters. It's usually only their names that fit the theming, which makes the names feel out of place.

It might not be something a lot of kids would take issue with, and that's all fine and good. I just think that a little more effort could be put into the worldbuilding and character design, is all. But other than that, the show's pretty great.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A great series...with a sadly lackluster ending
7 September 2019
I took some time to think on it after finishing season 2 last night, and while I'm not going to give away any spoilers...I found it very disappointing. The most I'll say is that one of the main perks the second season promised us - an exploration of Niko's backstory - is only brought up abruptly in the last half of the last episode. And while it is an interesting concept, it needed more time devoted to it both in-universe and out in order to truly flourish, and the execution of it is very rushed and sloppy and leads to the previously-mentioned ending of disappointment. (Without giving too much away, it's similar to how The Legend of Korra's second season ended off, in more ways than one.)

And while that is unfortunate, it's easier to stomach when season 2 already didn't raise my expectations higher than the first season already had, and since that one already ended on a perfect note, I'd say. The animation saw a marked improvement with many awe-inspiring effects, and some of the new settings were appealing, but the new characters weren't memorable (and never came back like the ones from the first season did), and the interactions between the original team started to get slightly stale after a while. Niko and Lyra reached their peak at the end of the first season, so their interactions here usually amount to sibling-like banter and such, Mandok is his usual cowardly self...and the one other thing I didn't like is that after growing into such an impressive shape by the end of the first season, Flicker starts off the second by regressing back to his base form, and he stays like that until the series ends. It was like they felt the need to shrink him down to make things more challenging for the heroes, but why not just leave him in Carondolet to begin with?

The second season also ends with hints that there may be a third sometime in the future, but it's worded a little vaguely, and honestly, even if it were true, the way the characters end off this season (one of them, specifically - again, no spoilers) makes it seem unlikely that I'd feel the same endearment toward them if I were to experience the story's continuance. Once you've seen for yourself the past few episodes, hopefully you'll comprehend what I mean.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not terrible, has a few good spots
2 July 2018
I watched this movie a lot as a kid, so I don't think I have it in me to hate it, especially since it's clearly not trying to live up to the original film. But I re-watched it for the first time in years recently, and I have to say, I've never in my life laughed so hard just from watching a film.

The story is very simple. Wilbur has gone back to his normal life on the farm alongside Charlotte's three daughters - the bold and adventurous Nellie, the cautious worrywart Aranea, and the cynical, ironically-named Joy. When spring comes, he ends up befriending a newborn black sheep after everyone else on the farm mocks him for being different. After the sheep, named Cardigan, is sold to another farmer, Wilbur sets out to visit him and make sure he's doing alright, but ends up being mistaken for a wild pig after a fox makes off with some of the other farm's livestock. Bound by a promise he made to stay with Cardigan until his wool is shorn (yeah, that's really why he can't just leave and go back home), Wilbur has to find a way to prove his innocence before the gaggle of angry farmers hunts him down.

The relationship between Wilbur and Cardigan is one of the weirdest parts of the film - for starters, Wilbur spends the first twenty minutes teaching Cardigan to act like a pig, and none of the human characters ever take issue with this, even as Cardigan takes part in things like eating Wilbur's pig slop. I get that it's supposed to be heartwarming or something, but why not just have Cardigan act like a normal sheep while still being friends with Wilbur? One of the things I happen to remember about the original story was how Wilbur grew to like Charlotte in spite of the ways in which she was different from him, like her unsettling, albeit natural thirst for blood. I don't think they were deliberately trying to go against that moral here by having Cardigan be just like Wilbur instead - it was just a weird choice that wasn't completely thought through, I'm guessing.

There are also a lot of times where Wilbur and Cardigan sleep next to each other and cuddle together or nuzzle each other's noses...Rewatching it, I briefly found myself wondering if Cardigan was supposed to be a female. (As far as I know, he's not.)

But while the film had some...odd moments, it demonstrated some competence, too. I think the best parts of it were when it focused on Charlotte's daughters. The three of them get a subplot about trying to live up to their mother's legacy, complete with a song number as they try to spell out Wilbur's innocence in their web. Even as an adult, I found them to be pretty endearing as characters and I was sort of invested in their arc, and I wish more of the film's running time had been devoted to them. (Though this investment did make their subplot's payoff a little disappointing for me -- without giving too much away, the girls eventually manage to convey the truth about the situation to the human characters, but a few minutes later, it's revealed that a key piece of evidence was sitting just a few inches away during the entire scene, so the truth probably would've come out whether the spiders had been there or not.)

The film had a lot of songs sprinkled throughout, by the way -- many of them were fairly pointless, but I give credit that at least the tunes were a little catchy. The voice acting was alright, and there was a surprising amount of intentional humor that managed to hit its mark. Apart from the three spiders, one other character I was fond of was this sassy cow with a milk problem that Wilbur meets at one point; she turns out to be a lot like Templeton, in that she lays out the harsh truths of the situation the heroes are in and calls them out when they make stupid decisions and stuff. She didn't need to be in the film at all, but for a side character, she was surprisingly likable and contributed to a good deal of the comedy.

And the animation, particularly the backgrounds, always struck me as quite impressive for what the movie is -- whether it's during Wilbur's happy days on the farm or while he's running for his life from the farmers and their dogs, the visuals did a good job of drawing me into the events of the story and are probably one of the few soft spots I still have from this old childhood memory.

Even without the effect of slight nostalgia (and believe you me, it is very slight), I don't regard this movie as all that terrible, even if I'm comparing it to the legacy of its predecessor -- as general direct-to-video kids' movies go, it's just an innocent, slightly dumb, but cute little film to hold their attention. The only questionable thing about it is the whole "you should teach your friends to act exactly like you instead of embracing their own unique differences" thing with Wilbur and Cardigan, and even that isn't something I'd expect kids to think into that much. Overall, I consider it a harmless story whether a follow-up to the original or not.

One last thing I neglected to mention is the movie's villain; a fox who attacks both farms Wilbur is at throughout the film and is responsible for the aforementioned framing of him. I didn't explore him in detail in this review because there isn't more to him than what you would expect from a villainous fox character in a movie about farm animals. He's there, he does fine, he gets a pointless song, and I like his voice. Make of that what you will.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed