dan-162-268581
Joined Nov 2014
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews7
dan-162-268581's rating
One of the best series I've seen in a long time. Good story, good actors (Steve Carell is superb! Being Swedish, I've seen a couple of swedish movies where comedians have been cast for lead role is thrillers. It's as "wow, if HE is doing/saying this, it has to be really, really serious". ), good direction and good dialogue (gold star to whoever wrote it). Also, a photo that was simple and clear, completely without "creative" pans, CGI and other things that movies these days apparently must have.
Unfortunately, the ending of the series is really, really bad. It doesn't really "end" at all, neither "happy ending" nor "sad ending" nor "sequel expected". Just left me with a big question mark. "Eh?". Still don't understand why....
Unfortunately, the ending of the series is really, really bad. It doesn't really "end" at all, neither "happy ending" nor "sad ending" nor "sequel expected". Just left me with a big question mark. "Eh?". Still don't understand why....
Liked the plot. A bit hard to grasp from start but eventually became clear.
But those in-a-car scenes cracked me up completely. Haven't seen worse since good old days with Humphrey Bogart.
Point is to make it look as if the actors actually sits in a car that's moving. Throughout decades this have been done in numerous ways. From having real cameras in a car and the actors actually driving to having a "car" on a trailer equipped with cameras and microphones.
Past 20 or so years it's been CGI, computer generated imagery, green room, etc.
I haven't a clue how the producers managed to create these ridiculous "moving backgrounds" to the in-a-car scenes. I tried not to bother first half of the film but since they are several and timely, I gave up about half way in.
I'm baffled. How can producers and others NOT see this?
But those in-a-car scenes cracked me up completely. Haven't seen worse since good old days with Humphrey Bogart.
Point is to make it look as if the actors actually sits in a car that's moving. Throughout decades this have been done in numerous ways. From having real cameras in a car and the actors actually driving to having a "car" on a trailer equipped with cameras and microphones.
Past 20 or so years it's been CGI, computer generated imagery, green room, etc.
I haven't a clue how the producers managed to create these ridiculous "moving backgrounds" to the in-a-car scenes. I tried not to bother first half of the film but since they are several and timely, I gave up about half way in.
I'm baffled. How can producers and others NOT see this?