This documentary asks all of the important questions that up until recently have been highly censored. Questioning is healthy and restricting the right to ask questions is anti-scientific. I appreciate any work of art that reaffirms that truth. After all, giving up our right to question the actions and motivations of our ever-expanding bureaucracies is a step backward and certainly not indicative of a true democracy.
Overall, this documentary is fair and does not manipulate any of the participant's contributions, regardless of which side of the debate from which those contributions are proffered, so in that respect it is certainly not one-sided, or otherwise unfair, as some of the other commentators have charged. There are plenty of resources out there that fully flesh-out the mainstream position regarding HIV, so expecting a re-hashing of that position from a documentary wishing to question that hypothesis is itself an unfair sentiment, and one that can only serve to support continued censorship about this topic.
Overall, this documentary is well-made and watching it is not a crime (at least not yet). If you are intelligent and like to research a topic before taking a position, then you will probably find much of value in this documentary. Furthermore, the claims made by the dissident contributors are supported by an uncensored evaluation of the collected epidemiological facts and that is easily verified by anyone who cares enough to explore the issue further. Whether you believe HIV=AIDS or not, the current HIV consensus has become a quasi religion, a belief system. All belief systems should be independently evaluated using scientific means, and that is really all that this documentary is encouraging its audience to do--to independently evaluate the evidence, without succumbing to the prejudices that are incessantly spewed by the very vocal AIDS majority.
Overall, this documentary is fair and does not manipulate any of the participant's contributions, regardless of which side of the debate from which those contributions are proffered, so in that respect it is certainly not one-sided, or otherwise unfair, as some of the other commentators have charged. There are plenty of resources out there that fully flesh-out the mainstream position regarding HIV, so expecting a re-hashing of that position from a documentary wishing to question that hypothesis is itself an unfair sentiment, and one that can only serve to support continued censorship about this topic.
Overall, this documentary is well-made and watching it is not a crime (at least not yet). If you are intelligent and like to research a topic before taking a position, then you will probably find much of value in this documentary. Furthermore, the claims made by the dissident contributors are supported by an uncensored evaluation of the collected epidemiological facts and that is easily verified by anyone who cares enough to explore the issue further. Whether you believe HIV=AIDS or not, the current HIV consensus has become a quasi religion, a belief system. All belief systems should be independently evaluated using scientific means, and that is really all that this documentary is encouraging its audience to do--to independently evaluate the evidence, without succumbing to the prejudices that are incessantly spewed by the very vocal AIDS majority.
Tell Your Friends