Change Your Image
gormly
LOL, stay steamed my friend, relief wont come today. Go sprout nonsensical thoughts and beat up on some poor unsuspective soul for the evening instead.
Reviews
King (2006)
Not sure about the film yet but a comment on the initial review...
menfis1985 commented on this film saying....
"the film shows great potential. "
How exactly does a film show potential? it is either good, bad or indifferent. A film cannot grow, it cannot evolve, it cannot "show potential"
We (the collective people) need to petition IMDb to have a vote system where we can vote off obvious shill reviews, reviews that are done by participants or promoters of the film being reviewed.
I am SO SICK of college project films being heralded as the next "Citizen Kane" or as in this instance.. having "potential".
Broken (2006)
The Comments tell the story on this wedge of crapola
When the overall rating is low and you have a ton of really negative comments, you can be pretty sure the movie sucks monkey rectum.
But when you add a gaggle of extremely positive reviews (like the main one) you are GUARANTEED that the movie is a complete waste of time.
It is NOT POSSIBLE for a bunch of people to think a film lacks direction, atmosphere, talent and credibility and yet another group thinking exactly the opposite.
When this happens on IMDb it is the work of shills promoting a sh*t film.
People's opinions certainly vary, but when you have a ton of "1"'s and a few "10"'s it is obvious the "10" are friends of the film.
This movie is utter crap. You'll start watching it and then 15 minutes later say to yourself..
DAMMIT! and then shut it off. I wish we had a vote off system on IMDb where we would vote off the obvious shilling commenter's.