nebinbc Reviews

The Demolisher (2015)

Painfully Bad

[1/10 · 20 February 2016]

There is nothing to say than - painfully bad. It is a sorry excuse for a movie. A waste of time and possibly very bad for your nerves. There is not enough substance for 10 sentences. At times it is an immature attempt to a suspense. No substance whatsoever. Too long with not enough story. Demented and unrealistic. Stupid to the core. Awful. There is nothing to say than - painfully bad. It is a sorry excuse for a movie. A waste of time and possibly very bad for your nerves. There is not enough substance for 10 sentences. At times it is an immature attempt to a suspense. No substance whatsoever. Too long with not enough story. Demented and unrealistic. Stupid to the core. Awful. There is nothing to say than - painfully bad. It is a sorry excuse for a movie. A waste of time and possibly very bad for your nerves. There is not enough substance for 10 sentences. At times it is an immature attempt to a suspense. No substance whatsoever. Too long with not enough story. Demented and unrealistic. Stupid to the core. Awful.

The Master (2012)

Long and Boring

[1/10 · 23 February 2013]

Although the acting could be rated well, it is hard to say because there was no idea to the story line, therefore, not really sure how well was it acted really. Aside from a few discussing details there was not much more to see. I am sure that some people will give good rating just because they haven't found the real idea in the movie and didn't understand it because there was nothing to understand in the first place, but were afraid to make a mistake. So they gave it above 5 stars just to be on a safe side. I lost those two hours and I am never getting them back but you have a choice. Taking a walk would be a better use of your time for sure. There are a few nude scenes and that could be worth seeing but again, it is actually paying too much even for that small detail.

Zero Dark Thirty (2012)

Seriously? 9/11

[4/10 · 17 January 2013]

I am seriously disappointed to say the least. Aside from average acting and unrealistic situations, the story has no continuity and is mildly boring at times. From the fact that 9/11 (as much as we don't want to believe it) is an inside job, plus including the background of a long hunt, (the longer - the better) Americans had a long enough time and under "terrorist" danger, enough money, to build several bases all over the Middle East and that was the real plan. OBL was a real person but aside from that the entire "dangerous man alive" is a fairytale. I see a movie as just one more unconvincing try to fabricate the truth. At the end, it is a very forgettable make believe propaganda. It could be seen as a fact for someone who was not alive at the time and didn't see what happen on that day in 2001.

InAlienable (2007)

Seriously?

[2/10 · 5 July 2012]

Seriously? You are really saying:"The movie was very interesting as far as Sci-fi is concerned, but what really sold this film was the outstanding performance by Richard "Captain Apollo" Hatch"? The worst part of the movie was a really poor quality of acting. Story was somewhat interesting but everything else was close to ridiculous. Not that there is nothing that sold the film but the film is a shame. I feel sorry for Marina Sirtis and Eric Avari because they were the only ones that did do some actual acting. Yes, Courtney Peldon was sexy but in a bimbo kind of way - no real intellect detected. This movie was a great waste of time and if it was 1954 maybe it would be appreciated as a third class film.