Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Blue Jasmine (2013)
5/10
A Disappointment and a Bore with some good acting
12 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I went to the cinema to see this film out of two reasons; good reviews and Woody Allen.

The good things;

  • Catherin Blanchetts is quite good; a little over the top maybe but it fits perfectly into the movie.


  • Some Scenes have this funny moment; the movie really isn't a comedy but there are some standout instances.


The bad things;

  • all the other acting; i quite like some of the actors (Cannavale, Baldwin) but none of them really were able to create a character, mostly because the writing didn't allow for it


  • the characters; other than 'jasmine' none of the characters seem relatable


  • the movie tries to touch so many subjects; "inferiority-complex", "living a simple life", "clash of classes", "drug issues" etc., but ultimately fails to tell us anything about these topics or portray them in an original style


  • the writing; the overall story is written in an incoherent "patchy" way and in a extremely boring way, how the movie tries to tell the past-story through conversations is weak, the dialogs feel forced and fake, a lot of the characters and story lines are dropped (chilli's friend, Danny's life, Augie) without any apparent reason


  • the movies really fails to accentuate the theme of the movie; a woman who can't cope with herself, her own mistakes.


I could understand that some critics would like the movie because of the tremendous talent that is shown by Mrs. Blachett, otherwise I can only think that they tried to bootlick a directorial legend.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Informant - tops and flops
1 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I'd like to just give a very short review in the form of pro and cons:

*minor spoilers*

pro: - Matt Damons dramatic acting - portrayal of the decay of the "Whitacre" as a moral character - transition from 90s cinematic look to the "present" one - tony hale (apart from that short "busteresque" moment)

cons: - Matt Damons comedic acting (works at most for some late night show) - storytelling not very fluid - Thomas Wilson always seems on the edge of breaking character

The Movie would have maybe worked if not for the bad execution of its comedic intent (acting and script wise).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
not good
21 July 2011
I initially didn't want to see this movie because I didn't love the first one (allthough I liked parts of it) - bienvenue chez les chtis - and because the theme seemed to be kind of the same as in BCLC.

I should have gone with my initial feelings, this movie is bad.

Where the humor in the first one was indeed funny and original in "RAD" (rien a declarer) it's a "schoolyard - puberty - bad parts from Ali G." kind of humor. Sometimes I felt as if this movie was a costly produced school project. Some Ideas (that (if well executed) would have been a bit funny) were shown in such an exaggerated manner (e.g. time-wise) that I laughed in the beginning. But after some minutes of depictions of ONE single joke I wanted to cry.

"RAD" lacks a good storytelling, the filmmaker should have realized that it is not enough to string together some "half-baked" ideas.

The whole French - Belgian thing was very badly realized and the acting was also done poorly (except Francois Damiens was funny in a quiet disturbing way).

To sum up I'd say that: "This movie makes you laugh because of how bad it is and because you feel obliged to pursue its comedic intend."
6 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed