Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Benediction (2021)
1/10
An indulgent mess
21 July 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Firstly, when you make a biopic about a poet whose most famous works centred around the First World War, you'd think you would show some of the war, you'd think we'd see Siegfried Sassoon in the trenches, especially as so much of the story focuses on the trauma he suffers as a result of the war, but there's nothing aside from some black and white footage and a brief scene in a hospital ward involving screaming men.

Instead we see a collage of moments throughout his life that never give us enough time to invest emotionally, apart from his brief friendship with Wilfred Owen. He had a relationship with Ivor Novello who is depicted as such a nasty piece of work you cannot understand why Sassoon would be remotely interested, let alone fall in love. It's unclear then what the nature of his subsequent friendship was with Novello's other ex lover. Then he's living with socialite Stephen Tennant. Are they flatmates or lovers? It seems the latter but when did that start? We saw them briefly at a party, while he was still with Novello, in a much earlier scene, but they barely spoke and now they're suddenly in a relationship with no context. And how much time has passed since breaking up with Novello? It could be a few months or a few years. It's very hard to tell. Sometimes the film is linear and sometimes it switches back and forth in time and it's hard to tell if you're watching a flashback or not.

There's also a rather pointless moment when he is introduced by Robbie Ross, his older friend (or teacher, or relative, who knows) to a wealthy older woman and stays in her house, and she offers herself him sex and he says no. We never see her again, so I don't see what the point of that was. And also what happens to Robbie Ross? His good friend whose storyline just ends without consequence.

We also frequently flit forward in time to an older Sassoon, played by Peter Capaldi, who speaks with a highly clipped accent not matched by Jack Lowden's younger Sassoon. And all you get from these flash forwards are long shots of a very sad and bitter old man with a fractious relationship with his son and a stale relationship with his wife, and no real idea as to why these relationships are like this, apart from the fact he is still traumatised by his experiences of the war that we never see. There's also a brief exchange with the older Stephen Tenant, which only leaves us more mystified as to what that relationship was

The nature of his relationship with his wife Hester is also vague. Sometimes it seems he genuinely had feelings for her. Often it doesn't. There's much evidence that Sassoon was bisexual, rather than gay, and I was interested to see how they explored that, but it very much suggests that he was gay and poor Hester entered into a passionless marriage.

A waste of an interesting life that was just trying to be too clever.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Artemis Fowl (2020)
1/10
What a crying shame - murdered a brilliant book
27 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Possibly the worst adaptation from a book I've ever seen. The books are very funny and quirky and unique with a sharp edge and a nice dose of silliness, aptly described as 'die hard but with fairies'. This film was a sirupy, bland, tacky, cheesy mess that would have seemed out of date if played on CBBC in the 1980s (don't know if cbbc existed then but you get the picture). This could have been the start of a brilliant and hilarious fantasy franchise that really championed the Irish humour and folklore. Instead it was a catastrophe.

Artemis himself: in the book a cold hearted anti hero, who at 12 years old, only ever wears a suit and outwardly feels no empathy and scorns at any sort of emotion. Only starts to soften in book two, but only a little. And an actively practicing high level criminal. In the film, a playful kid who loves surfing and outward bound activities and sentimentally listening to his father reading him fairytales - and who is appalled when the TV news calls his father a criminal.

And aside from that so many things, why is Mulch tall and with a height complex? Where did that come from? And why do they all become friends so fast? There's generally a lot more narky taking the piss and being rude to each other in the books, replaced by doe eyed, heart warming long looks and emotional music here.

The main problem, why didn't they just adapt the first book, rather than try and squeeze half baked elements of the second book? The evil child genius discovers the existence of the fairies and plots to kidnap one of them to steal their secrets, he does so and there's a frenzied rescue mission. That is more than enough. Instead they added in an honourable father rescue mission and introduced a half baked version of Opal Koboi (what a waste of a cracking villain introduced in book 2, the vain, high pitched narcissist beautiful pixie turns into an anonymous hooded villain with a distorted voice)

These books are brilliant. Get your kids to read them, read them to your kids, read them yourself as an adult, such a shame they butchered them in this catastrophe of a film that could have been so much better!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Genius (2017– )
9/10
Well written, Magnificently acted, intelligent. Should be everywhere!
21 January 2018
I couldn't not write a review of this after I saw some of the negative 3/10, 1/10 reviews near the top. Thankfully scroll down a bit and you'll see nothing but 10/10, 9/10. This is a really fantastic, excellently crafted television series that delves into the discoveries and the life of Einstein and other notables around him.

Watching the warm and intense and completely unique love story deteriorate into the bitter breakdown in his marriage (not a spoiler, you know through the flash forward that his first marriage didn't work out) is tragic and immensely frustrating as you see this great mind struggle to grasp basic emotional empathy or understanding.

I've seen some reviews calling this 'hollywood trash'. It's not. It's deeply unfair in places, it's uplifting and exciting in others, there are no foregone, predictable conclusions, it's funny and the characters are multi layered and brilliantly written and acted. Johnny Flynn's brilliant! It's also wonderfully shot.

The only negatives I'd have would be that it can, at times seem a little expositional in the dialogue, but rarely, and that Geoffrey Rush takes over as the older Einstein a little too early - testament to Johnny Flynn that such a great actor as Geoffrey Rush has to work hard to follow.

They're making Picasso next and I hope by then this goes onto Netflix as no one seems to know about it. I had to buy it and it was money well spent.
28 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent film. Beautifully acted and shot.
18 June 2013
I thought this film was fantastic. It was beautiful to watch and seriously tore at the heart strings. I'm not particularly into art or horses but I loved it and I imagine if you are into art or horses, you'll be bowled over. Where I wasn't particularly keen on Dominic Cooper before, in this he had me completely invested. I think the star of the film however has to be Hattie Morahan. She had so much life in her portrayal of Laura Knight and she had me completely captivated from the beginning. Dan Stevens and Emily Browning were also good and there was a fascinating chemistry sparking off between all three leads. There's something for everyone here. Takes a bit of warming up from the beginning but I came out of the cinema buzzing. Go see.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed