Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Good work with a low budget
22 December 2002
This movie probably cost around three hundred thousand..of course, that's in lyra.

I loved this movie. It was really funny. They successfully and thoroughly insulted everyone!

The humor wasn't really all that original nor well thought out, but it was well implemented.

I would probably give this movie around a 6, and say that it's enjoyable to watch. It's hard to find in the video stores, but I have seen it on TV twice in my lifetime.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not what I expected but still a great disaster movie
21 July 2002
I expected to see a war-strategy movie. Although the movie did have an aspect of strategy in the storyline, it was basically a disaster movie. Don't get me wrong, though, it's a good one.

The acting and effects were very convincing. It's funny that the story seemed unrealistic to me, since it's based on actual events. Harrison Ford surprised me by not acting like the resourceful reluctant hero that he seems to have been typecast into. This movie gave him a somewhat original role. Liam Neeson gave about the same level and style of performance that he always does.

It's similar in feel to U-571, but with some major differences. K-19 is not really a war movie, it's a historical disaster movie. K-19 is based more tightly on actual events. K-19 had, in my opinion, more realistic actors. The similarities are look and feel. (Of course, both are set in submarines.) Instead of a climax, the movies were non-stop action. They both give a sort of team-spirit feeling; making viewers think what they would do/be able to in the same situation.)

I highly recommend seeing this movie while it's in the theatre, since it's a totally immersing film; it will be hard to stay grounded.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed