I read the book just before watching the film. There are lots of differences but this is to be expected. Screen versions of books always change a lot of things. But there is one thing from the very beginning that is unforgivable. The opening scene tells us it is 1936. Then we see at least 50 young men trying out for crew. In the midst of this we are informed that it's an Olympic year.
Even if you haven't read the book this film assumes that it's entire audience is going to believe that an Olympic rowing team can be selected and trained up to a winning standard in the same year they will go to the Olympics. It's insanely ridiculously to expect even the most ignorant of audiences to accept this. Besides the years of training needed for any sport, what about the years of qualifying races? It's all just supposedly happening in this one year
C'mon George! It would have been the easiest thing in the world for Clooney as a director to show the boys in tryouts in a few scenes, then jump to "three years later" to focus on the run up to the Olympics. The way he's done it, the timing presented, makes no sense whatsoever and ruined the film for me from the very start.
Even if you haven't read the book this film assumes that it's entire audience is going to believe that an Olympic rowing team can be selected and trained up to a winning standard in the same year they will go to the Olympics. It's insanely ridiculously to expect even the most ignorant of audiences to accept this. Besides the years of training needed for any sport, what about the years of qualifying races? It's all just supposedly happening in this one year
C'mon George! It would have been the easiest thing in the world for Clooney as a director to show the boys in tryouts in a few scenes, then jump to "three years later" to focus on the run up to the Olympics. The way he's done it, the timing presented, makes no sense whatsoever and ruined the film for me from the very start.
Tell Your Friends