I entirely understand the praise this film has attained, even King himself called it his favorite adaptation of one of his books. And as a massive fan of the book... I disagree. Now I love the films cast, don't get me wrong, they play their roles to perfection and they really feel like they do in the book. But that barely saves this film due mainly to Darabont's clumsy, wannabe writing. It is true that a majority of the film uses dialogue from the book, but it doesn't always transfer smoothly and most of the best lines from the book are given to Paul Edgecombe which makes some of the side characters feel more like forgettable cliched characters when they were so fleshed out in the book, although the emotional scenes still got to me and were well executed so kudos for that. But had you not read the book, none of these problems would've been noticed and you would find it as incredible as everyone else on this site, which is just fine. The one thing you may notice though, is the drag. For a 3 hour adaptation it left a surprising lot of content from the book out, especially the sub-plot with old Edgecombe going through memories of his life after John Coffey which was a masterpiece that could've easily been well executed but for some reason was left out.
1 out of 6 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends