Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
my favorite movie ever- classic Russel
5 January 2009
May not really rate a 10/10 for great movies like Citizen Kane, or It's A Wonderful Life or something, but it has everything a movie needs - fun and excitement. Ken Russel loves any excuse to have a psychedelic dream/hallucination scene, and or some sacrilegious rant but this one goes all out. The most psychedelic movie scene ever made is probably the last "tank" scene in Altered States, but this movie has it all.

and Amanda Donahoe is probably the sexiest villain ever created!

For background , my next fav. is The Wicker Man (1973 original, the recent Nic Cage remake was awful). Then "Elizabeth" with Blanchet, heartbreaking, and Gladiator (Ridley Scott. With Russell Crow). Scott is probably the better director, but not as fun as Russel.

But for all of us who love this movie - READ THE BOOK by Stoker! (Don't remember the URL, but there are a lot of old books published for free online, for free download and I found it and printed the whole thing out. maybe e-books.com or some such?) Russel made something fun and watchable out of a complete mess of a book. In the original, there's a few extra characters that serve no purpose and it's impossible to follow the plot as characters are in one place then appear somewhere else that makes no sense and there's tons of logical flaws in it. There is kind of a cool, kite in a thunder storm thing.

Finally, my band did a version of the theme song for fun. Then we researched more lyrics and it turns out that it's a very old (1800's) traditional song from the British isles, based on an actual legend. With two more verses that the movie didn't use.

So, to wrap up.. it's a wonderful movie based on a terrible novel that was based on a fun song based on a silly legend.

Kudos for Russel for even thinking of doing it and doing such a great job.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twilight Zone (2002–2003)
8/10
not bad at all
5 January 2009
I don't know why the some people seem to think this (2002) series was so bad. Sure, it's not the original. But like the remake in 1985, it has some good episodes and some weaker ones. we all loved Serling, but even some of the originals were a little weak at times. don't over-romanticize Serling. he was one of the greatest writers ever, but not just because of the twilight zone, but his great westerns, crime dramas, etc. and even the original series had a few clunkers - don't forget that he didn't write them all, anyways

Compared to what's out there, from predictable sitcoms to endless CSI/Law and Order formulaic shows, this one's not that bad. Heck, compare it to the absolutely horrible Sci-F channel movies,, yuck!

So, I say. I enjoy this version just fine. heck.. it's only TV.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed