John A. Russo, the co-writer of Night of the Living Dead's screenplay, decided in 1997 to do a George Lucas and shoot some new scenes and edit them into the movie, along with a new music score. Romero passed on directing the new scenes and, rather than taking the hint, Russo went ahead and directed them himself.
Recently released as the Night of the Living Dead 30th Anniversary Edition, the result is laughable to say the least. Despite Russo's claim that the new scenes blend in seamlessly, the new footage stands out a mile, with a brighter picture and higher contrast levels than the older footage. And, to add insult to injury, Russo cut 15 minutes form the film to make way for the new stuff. Also, for some reason, Russo changed the ending, from Romero's bleak nihilistic conclusion to the dissapearance of the zombie problem.
Despite a massive backlash from fans, Russo still wouldn't give up. He produced Children of the Living Dead which was released last week here in the UK (direct to video, unsurprisingly).
I almost cried.
The film looks like it was made in the 80's, despite the extremely cheap looking packaging proclaiming "A 2001 PRODUCTION!" The story and script is, bluntly, s**t, as is the acting and, technically speaking, I've seen better camera work on You've Been Framed. On several occasions, the crew, cameramen and boom operators are clearly visible in reflections, shadows or in the background.
The film is meant to be a sequel to Night, but what the Hell were Dawn and Day of the Dead?! Russo doesn't even acknowledge these exist, implying that after Night, the problem disappeared, despite in Romero's classic sequels the zombies go on to outnumber human 400,000 to 1 and ultimately destroy mankind. This explains the 30th anniversary edition's ending. Russo was thinking ahead.
At the beginning of the film, Tom Savini appears as a survivalist former police officer, and at this point the film gets dangerously close to being entertaining. Savini is superb, and his methods of zombie killing are both inventive and well choreographed by Savini himself. However, as soon as you think, "Hey, this film might be quite good!", Savini is killed, despite having top billing in the credits.
The film goes downhill from here.
Just what is this Abbot Hayes character, anyway? Is he a zombie? He has far too much "intelligence" to be a zombie. He doesn't eat anybody, he just wanders around and growls menacingly at the camera. There is no confrontation with him at the end, the final shot is of him growling at the camera, for about the 20th time in the movie.
I just can't express in words my hatred for this film. I got so angry typing this review that I hit the keyboard, breaking the space bar, so aplogies if there are a few words joined together. I can only hope George Romero hasn't seen this film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends