Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Svjedoci (2003)
1/10
Annoying Film Technique. Unwatchable.
31 August 2020
Each scene is replayed over and over again, with small changes and additions.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Annoying Jumps Back and Forth Through the Story
4 March 2020
Sometimes lots of flashbacks can work in a movie. They don't in this one, made it unwatchable.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1917 (2019)
4/10
Not As Good As The Hype
8 February 2020
I wanted to like this movie after hearing all the good reviews and awards hype. There's good stuff, acting is fairly good, effects were okay, but at times the CGI looked blurry, buildings at middle or far distance, e.g. It was distracting.

The biggest annoyance was the story line. Simple premise, two soldiers ordered to get from point A to point B to deliver a message. The problem was they continually allowed themselves to be distracted from their mission, and thus to get into trouble. A better script could have found ways to add drama without making the pair look like nincompoops. I have never been a soldier, but at several places I could see a potential problem before these trained soldiers did, and I would have avoided their injuries easily.

An average war movie.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Let It Bleed (2016)
1/10
Watched About Five Minutes
31 January 2020
Unconvincing action scene opens the movie. Didn't pull me into the story.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Death Game (2017)
1/10
Never Caught my Interest
31 January 2020
Turned off after a few minutes. Acting, directing, and camerawork were poor.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Marie (2001)
1/10
Unwatchable
31 January 2020
Switched it off after a few minutes. Strange opening sequence with short apparently unrelated scenes one after another. Video seems low resolution or otherwise low quality, not sharp as you'd expect from a recent-ish movie. Acting fair or poor.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid SciFi Yarn
25 January 2020
Decent plot, good acting for the most part, good effects. Some odd things, like strange flashing lights all over the cockpit panels. Good for a $3M film!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Absent Comedy
23 January 2020
Despite being billed by IMDb as a comedy/drama, there aren't many laughs here. If you're looking for an uplifting story, or a point, or a happy ending, this ain't your movie. If you want to see a two-hour train wreck in slow motion, without any cool CGI special effects, you're in the right place! This is mostly a character study of dysfunctional and unpleasant family members. On the plus side, after watching you are almost certain to think your life is pretty good after all! The mechanics of the film are probably good...the acting, filming, direction, etc. My rating is based on the entertainment value, which I think is very poor.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mostly Okay, Some Misinformation.
23 January 2020
Narrator states that world population at the time of the French Revolution was 20 million, whereas it was actually close to 1000 million. Such an obvious and easily checked, and huge, error puts the rest of the film's numbers in doubt. That said, the point of the film, that slums house a significant and growing percentage of the world's population, seems sound. Some of the filming/editing techniques, rapid pans, slow-motion, were distracting. They seemed like ways to show off a video skill rather than to add anything useful to the movie. Narrator felt it necessary to divide several statistics into per year, per month, per week, per day, per hour, per minute, per second {I may have exaggerated slightly}, which was tedious and pointless.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Painful to Watch
21 January 2020
Could watch only about a third. If you are a fan of the book, as I am, this story is very different. The characters and the atmosphere don't ring true to the spirit of the book. Beyond that, I found the acting or direction only fair. Some of the editing was bizarre...such as a sailboat suddenly appearing 50 feet away. Not that easy to sneak up on someone in the middle of a lake!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Existence (2012)
2/10
Nice cinematography, not much else.
16 September 2019
Poor character development; no one's actions make much sense based on what we know about them. Weak story that goes nowhere.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No Adventure, Comedy, or Sci-Fi Here!
16 September 2019
This is a poorly-executed 20- or 30-somethings relationship film, with about a minute of vague science fiction near the end. It's described as Adventure, Comedy, Drama...I only detected drama out of those three, and probably more like melodrama.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Collider (I) (2013)
7/10
Solid Sci-Fi Tale
13 September 2019
Decent story and acting. CGI varied from good to not-so-good, but wasn't a large enough part of the movie to be a detriment. Pacing was good.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Circuit (2007–2010)
1/10
Highly distracting camera techniques.
8 September 2019
Found the show to be unwatchable due to annoying camera zooms, pans, jumps.
11 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed