Til Ex Do Us Part (2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
How far would one woman go to get her dream man
lisafordeay1 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Till Ex Do US Apart is a 2018 thriller starring Kelly Sullivan. The story is about a woman named Sophia who is in for a shock when her husband Kyle's ex girlfriend Claire enters the picture as she is their new neighbour.

Things take a turn when Claire tells Kyle that she is pregnant but is she really pregnant and does she want Kyle for herself. The minute I seen the actress playing Claire I knew her motive as she starred in another film where she pretended to be pregnant and moved in next door under a fake alias.

Overall this was a very mediocre thriller that was so predictable you knew what was going to happen once it started.

4/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
spoiler alert: fun fact
haroot_azarian8 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Fairly routine made for tv thriller. Story line extremely far-fetched. First of all Kyle is a seriously dim husband, who simply takes psycho Claire's word for it when she shows him a pregnancy test stick and an ultrasound. Secondly the stupid little twerp of a daughter Emma who went ballistic at Sophia for embarrassing her on her stupid sweet sixteen, when stupid clearly stupid Kyle was at fault for not consulting with Sophia before gifting the car to Emma. Thirdly how on earth can a realtor be such an expert in covert actions i.e. Hacking computers, and doing all the other stuff which ended in Sophia being arrested by yet another lifetime dumb detective on stupid evidence? The smartest person in this comedythriller was poor Rachel. And things didn't turn out too good for her in the end.

And now the fun fact this is the second LMN movie where Anna Van Hooft fakes pregnancy, the other one being My Baby is Gone (2017)
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Possibly the worst movie ever made
fkopun-2742924 July 2019
Started watching this because I thought the director was Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire). Seconds into the movie I realized that either Danny Boyle was slumming it (no pun intended) or there are two directors named Danny Boyle. This hot mess of a movie was in fact, directed by Danny J. Boyle, not Danny Boyle. But the worst thing about this movie isn't the directing, it's the godawful script that seems to have been written by a robot being fed Harlequin Romances and Hallmark movie scripts. We were transfixed by the awfulness of it. Skip it. Do literally anything else with your life, but do not watch this movie.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This movie gets points for the universality of its ineptitude
davejones7 September 2019
I don't think I've ever seen a movie that is this bad in quite so many ways. It really is kind of spectacular. As fkopun-27429 put it, it might just be the worst movie I've ever seen. It's almost worth watching for that reason.

First, the script is truly awful--the dialogue, especially. The characters seem to be explaining a film rather than actually participating in it. But the director has to take equal blame. As each scene begins, the characters seem to be standing in place, waiting for the cameras to roll. As if they were in the midst of doing nothing (except trying to make a movie) each time we come upon them. I think my favorite scene was where one of the characters is at home, looking in a mirror (in her living room) applying makeup. She steps away from the mirror, revealing the reflection of a mysterious intruder. Only he's standing about two feet behind her (he must've been *really* quiet!) However, she only seems to notice him when she goes back to looking in the mirror. This is followed by the most exposition-laden conversation possibly ever recorded on film. Or whatever they shot this on.

There's a weird, static quality to every scene. And I don't mean static in a stylistic, Wes Anderson kind of way. This lifeless feel is aggravated by the movie's unnaturally uniform lighting.

But there are also some truly bizarre visual moments in the film, too. There's one scene in which a woman is out jogging at night, then glances across what appears to be an open field. CUT TO what she supposedly sees: her neighbor's house. And through the living room window we see two (uniformly lit) people having a conversation. Seems straightforward enough. Only it looks as if they used some kind of optical effect to paste a rectangular section of an interior scene of the two people talking onto the outside of the house. Everything is out of scale, and it looks as if someone chainsawed a hole in the house so that we could watch two (uniformly lit) giants chatting.

There are a number of scenes that are marred by small flubs or physical errors that would have caused any other director or editor to discard that scene, but they've been left in because, I'm assuming, that was the only take they had.

The music is obviously just lifted from some library of canned mood moments.

It's as if everyone involved in this film was told, "Okay, people, we've only got four days to write and shoot a feature movie. I know that's not much time, but we're just going to have to do the best we can to get through this thing. If anything goes wrong, we'll fix it in post. Let's get to it!"

I had the impression that the actors were all quite capable, but they're struggling with the awful dialogue and the badly staged scenes. I felt sorry for them.

I gave it two stars because I thought the live sound was pretty good.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie should have been titled "How Dumb is Kyle?"
hoops-534366 March 2023
Kyle, supposedly a kind, caring, honest person, goes off the deep end when his neighbor says she is pregnant and the baby is his. He believes her from the start and doesn't bother with details that level headed people would have demanded, simple things like: evidence that the baby is his, proof that she is pregnant (and showing a pregnancy test is not proof- she could have pulled it out of someone's garbage.) Instead, he immediately goes to his wife (with whom he is getting ready to get back together) and tells her about it AT HER OFFICE DURING THE WORK DAY!

And Emma (Kyle and Sophia's beautiful daughter) never seems to get too upset when she finds our about the "baby" and the trouble it is causing. She is more concerned with getting a boy to like her and getting a convertible for her birthday.

Besides Kyle there seems to be some other dumb ones in this movie.

The only reason to watch this would be to marvel at the stupidity built into the characters.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fairly diverting wacko of the week movie
phd_travel27 February 2019
A couple reconcile but later finds out when they were temporarily separated a neighbour he slept with tells him she is pregnant.

The neighbour lady gets attacked and gets text messages threatening her. She is staging things to make his wife look like she is after her.

Not too different from the typical Lifetime wacko thriller but it's a moderately diverting watch.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent Lifetime thriller
mjanssens269 April 2021
I'm reviewing this as a Lifetime movie, not an Oscar contender. This film was a fun watch with plenty of twists and a couple decent kills. This isn't the type of film to be taken that seriously, so sit back and grab some snacks and a drink and enjoy the ride.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Dad's Been Arrested!!!"
lavatch21 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
One has to feel for poor Kyle Ridley, the sensitive husband of Sophia and father to young Emma. Everything goes wrong for Kyle in this domestic melodrama. The film opens with the moment when Kyle and Sophia plan to renew their vows after a brief separation. Then, the dam breaks and the lives of the couple are deluged.

First, Kyle is led to believe that in his one-timer with his neighbor, Claire Johnson, she was impregnated. Then, he makes the stupid mistake of spending more time with Claire, even introducing young Emma to her, distancing himself even farther from his wife. Claire gives helpful advice to Emma in matters of the heart. Next, Kyle punches out a man who flirts with Claire after he has viewed a lurid internet video of her. Young Emma then has the undignified experience of having to call her mom and say, "Dad's been arrested!!!"

The circumstances become especially dire when Sophia herself is arrested and eventually charged with the attempted murder of Claire, after Claire intentionally did a "brake job" on Kyle's beautiful car, which she then nearly totaled.

In the final stretch of the film, it is entirely up to Sophia to research the identity of Claire, after Sophia's friend Rachel, who has the goods on Claire, is drowned by Claire. But the resilient Claire never gives up by relying on her personal strength to find the truth and preserve the value that is most lauded in the film: the importance of family.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ex-citing, ex-hilarating cinematic ex-perience!
paulgibson-298066 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
If tense, thrilling and twist-turning televisual theatrics are your cup of tea, then this superbly directed and acted cinematic classic should be just up your street.

It beggars belief that all the thespians involved are not household names but it is reassuring to know that the director Danny Boyle has been recognised for his other less accomplished works.

Without wishing to mar your viewing pleasure by regurgitating the plot of this celluloid triumph, the action basically revolves around a conniving, wanton, brazen, young hussy who accuses a silver tongued charmer of being the father of her unborn child after they had a night of passion. What complicates matters somewhat is that the silver tongued charmer Kyle has just decided to reignite his relationship with the mother of his existing child. At this point, much murderous mayhem ensues as the pregnant rejected strumpet decides to exact her revenge on his renewed love interest.

Whilst all the thespians are at the peak of their powers, especial mention must be given to the gentleman actor who received a hefty fist to his nose courtesy of Kyle. His appearance in the film was far too brief and it is hoped that he gets the chance to showcase his undoubted credentials in future similar blockbuster movies.

Anna Van Hooft is suitably menacing as Claire and one can only assume that her mantlepiece will be laden with acting awards judging by her acting masterclass in this cinematic smogasboard of delights.

Ultimately, this televisual triumph should act as a warning to all gentleman who have nice wives and children to avoid succumbing to the wanton charms of brazen, scheming hussies who live next door and for nice wives everywhere to avoid being neighbours of attractive young ladies who may want to be more than just a friend with their hunky husbands.

Hopefully a sequel is in the offing and an apt title for it could be 'Til Ex Do Us Part 2.' Thoroughly recommended!!
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed