PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
7,8/10
1,3 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA group of citizens in West Virginia challenges a powerful corporation to be more environmentally responsible.A group of citizens in West Virginia challenges a powerful corporation to be more environmentally responsible.A group of citizens in West Virginia challenges a powerful corporation to be more environmentally responsible.
- Premios
- 3 premios y 2 nominaciones
Wilbur Tennant
- Self - Farmer
- (metraje de archivo)
- (voz)
Bernard Reilly
- Self - Lawyer for DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
Bruce Karrh
- Self - Corporate Medical Director, DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
Kathleen Forte
- Self - Public Relations, DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
Charles Holliday
- Self - CEO, DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
Robert Rickard
- Self - Chief Scientist, DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
George Kennedy
- Self - Lead Toxicologist, DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
John Bowman
- Self - Lawyer for DuPont
- (metraje de archivo)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- ConexionesFeatured in Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: PFAS (2021)
Reseña destacada
Shocking!!! - Former DuPont Employee
First - the documentary. I thought the evidence was damning and generally well presented. It leaves little room for doubt about the harmful effects PFOA and the misguided attempts at damage control by DuPont. The documentary reminds everyone that watches it that the impact of this chemical is global and virtually everyone is impacted, although to what extent is unclear.
Although I consider a 7 star review "very good," I felt balance of time was weighted a little too heavily on a few individuals that were (or may have been) affected by PFOA vs. what took place in the courts. It seemed clear that the producers had access to a fair amount of company documentation and some very telling interviews with company spokesmen as well as attorneys for the plaintiffs and it was those sequences that had the biggest impact for me.
As a retired Mech. Engr. for DuPont, I can honestly say I have never encountered any circumstances where I saw or was asked to do anything morally or legally wrong. I was the project lead on a multi-million dollar solvent capture project, and I can say that our internal Environmental Dept. Representatives were often more trying to deal with on regulatory requirements than the local EPA representatives. That's not to say I dispute the message in this documentary. It's clear some company officials made some very misguided decisions in an effort to limit the financial impact to the corporation.
Although I consider a 7 star review "very good," I felt balance of time was weighted a little too heavily on a few individuals that were (or may have been) affected by PFOA vs. what took place in the courts. It seemed clear that the producers had access to a fair amount of company documentation and some very telling interviews with company spokesmen as well as attorneys for the plaintiffs and it was those sequences that had the biggest impact for me.
As a retired Mech. Engr. for DuPont, I can honestly say I have never encountered any circumstances where I saw or was asked to do anything morally or legally wrong. I was the project lead on a multi-million dollar solvent capture project, and I can say that our internal Environmental Dept. Representatives were often more trying to deal with on regulatory requirements than the local EPA representatives. That's not to say I dispute the message in this documentary. It's clear some company officials made some very misguided decisions in an effort to limit the financial impact to the corporation.
útil•282
- bmco-247-721025
- 15 feb 2019
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Devil We Know?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 35 minutos
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was The Devil We Know. Envenenados (2018) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde