Seat in Shadow (2016) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Anchored by one performance
euroGary7 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"I hope everyone enjoys... well, perhaps that's the wrong word" said director Henry Coombes introducing the screening of 'Seat in Shadow' at the 2016 Edinburgh International Film Festival. "I hope everyone gets something out of it" he substituted. Was he right?

Central to the film is the performance of David Sillars as Albert, an ageing, sometime-psychotherapist now addicted to YouTube self-help videos (when he first appears he is making toothpaste from charcoal) and creating rather dreadful artworks. Albert is asked to exercise his psychotherapy skills once more to help the down-in-the-mouth Ben, a young man with a domineering boyfriend. Sillars - gifted with a great part (tellingly, he co-wrote the script with Coombes) - is terrific, convincingly portraying Albert as by turns gullible (all those self-help videos), pathetic (dancing with gay abandon opposite a potted palm in a nightclub) and inspiring confidence (in his therapy sessions with Ben).

Sillars' powerhouse performance would put all but the most talented actors in the shade; sadly Jonathan Leslie, as Ben, appears very inexperienced, delivering his lines in a lifeless way that suggests he's reading them for the first time. It does not help that his part is under-written: beyond a few scenes with his boyfriend and a bit of cod psychology involving a doll he once made out of twigs, we get very little idea of what makes him tick. A different actor might build on what little the script gives him in order to create a bit of interest for the audience - Ben is, after all, suffering - but Leslie does not make the effort.

As well as the lack of character development, the solution to Ben's troubles seems too conveniently arrived at, as if the screenwriters grew bored and decided to quickly wrap things up. So - Sillars' performance aside - I would have to say this film is a disappointment.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A message somewhere in this one
cekadah10 March 2018
This one is for the avant-garde crowd. It's full of strangely odd but likeable characters. The plot is both obscure and obvious.

My advice is to watch this for the dialog, which makes sense and nonsense, at times. Nothing is really gained by movies end. It is like the opening where the two boys go to have sex --- behind a sign above a highway. Moral of story - life passes by even when hiding.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun Jung
fromdecatur-1012630 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed this movie. At its core, it's a story about a young man who is depressed, trying to find his way in life and troubled by his unsatisfying relationship with his boyfriend. That said, the core is buried very deep and we are taken on a wild journey of imagination. Albert, the boy's therapist, is the guide into Jungian Active Imagination, leads him on his journey, guides him, and follows him. We visit the jungle, the city, the garden, the nightclub, the intermingling of bodies, the desert, and the apartment. Ultimately, the therapy leads Albert into confronting his own Shadow, which he does with grace. The music is very effective throughout the movie.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Puzzling in parts but entertaining
mikemalcolm665 February 2020
OK this is a solid Arthouse film. A coming of age story about a young gay boy embroiled in a poisonous relationship. Shot in Glasgow there is a lot to enjoy from a cinematography point of view. Dreamlike landscape shots combine with extreme closeup shots to create a quite atmospheric film. Sillars as the eccentric Artist cum ex-psychoanalyst excels here in a film that is based in static location of his flat.. He portrays Albert as a both a whimsical and slightly tragic figure as he struggles with his own demons whilst helping a young man overcome his own. Due to the main gay theme in the film, many will dismiss this as a cult niche movie, yet there is something more amongst the sharp dialogue and the spaces in between. A couple of surreal or dreamlike (?) sexual scenes towards the end of the film seem a slightly unnecessary signposting of the messages the film was trying to convey, but fortunately don't wreck it. I'd watch it predominantly for Sillars in his film debut performance of Albert. One can only hope the calls come in for him on the back of this for more roles and screen time.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed