Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
The Apology (2016)

FAQ

The Apology



    It's not affirmed to be true because it has no objective basis.

    (1) Many official documents depicts "comfort women" as legitimate wage workers.

    At that time, Japan had government-regulated licensed prostitution system. Probably due to poverty, many Japanese women worked as prostitutes, that was one of legitimate jobs.

    We can find descriptions that preserve wage workers, "comfort women";
    • "Half of the income of the hostesses(comfort women) will be allotted to the (brothels) managers" ( It means the rest was allotted to comfort women)
    • "Expenses incident to these (physical) examination (of comfort women) will be taken care of by the managers"
    ( "Amenities in the Japanese Armed Forces", Research Report No.120, ATIS, U.S. official document )

    (2) No one ever disclosed the official notifications nor orders to implement rape, abuse, captivity, deceiving in recruit, human trafficking.

    (3) Lawless soldiers' criminalities existed. But its number is unclear.

    There were criminalities by lawless soldiers or lawless lower units that didn't conform to the government-regulated licensed prostitution system. Three women in this film were thought to be victims of those cases. 81 cases of those were judged in the trials after the war. ( NAID 40020019413 and 40020385890, in Japanese, SAJI Akito, Osaka University of Economics and Law) But actual number of those isn't known because there are no verifiable materials.



    Because what they insist has no objective basis

    • They insist victims' testimonies on their personal experience are the evidence. But that doesn't prove the systematic atrocity nor existence of 200,000 victims.
    • They insist official documents show existence of "comfort women" or involvement of Japanese Army in transportation/physical-examination, and those are the evidence. But those are not description of atrocity.
    • They insist description of atrocity in commercial publications is the evidence. But primary sources of those are not shown or verified.
    ( You can check the Korean government's site "e-Museum of the Victims of Japanese Military Sexual Slavery" )

    It is also known that what they insist contradicts the facts below;
    • No name of killed or dead "comfort women" during the war is known.
    • No record of parents or relatives who searched for disappeared "comfort women" after the war.
    • No witness other than victims themselves about kidnapping by the military and government authorities in Korea.
    • No record of identified(date, location, victims, perpetrators) systematic atrocity.
    If there had been large number of atrocities, some of these cases should have been disclosed. But, actually, nothing is known.

Contribute to this page

Suggest an edit or add missing content
The Apology (2016)
Top Gap
By what name was The Apology (2016) officially released in India in English?
Answer
  • See more gaps
  • Learn more about contributing
Edit page

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb app
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb app
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb app
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.