Wight Space (2016– ) User Reviews

Horrendous

[bobgray-3 · 1/10 · 3 July 2019]

Story sounded great. Cover art looked great. I couldn't watch 2 minutes. So bad. Acting atrocious. Fast forward a few times. Story line horrible. No ghosts. No sci-fi. Just people acting mad at each other and doing it badly.

wrong space

[scottamac · 1/10 · 7 September 2018]

I tried, I really tried to watch this for 15 minutes. The acting is so terrible. I jumped forward , It was still terrible. Guy orders a coffee and when he sits it down on the table you can tell the cup is empty by the way it jiggles around. Everyone is over acting except the prostitutes ( which is usually not the case LOL) Anyway, Amateurish in so many ways. The millenniums might like it cause its brainless and has some old school ghost appearing and disappearing camera work. Maybe some cannabis would help??? LOL I doubt it. Don't waste your time.

Ed Wood LIVES!!

[wjbrowning2000 · 1/10 · 24 February 2019]

Yes it is good to see that Ed Wood, of the infamous Plan 9 from Outer Space has a disciple. To say the acting is wooden and direction static, is to imply there is acting and direction. This would be a false implication. Actors in this series usually recite lines either looking deadpan at the screen or in full profile. What should be important revelations have the feel of a public access interview. The chief villain has a large scar which would work as parody as in Austin Powers, however, it serves to inform us of his badness since the acting, writing and direction fail to inform us. The scar, by the way, is of the Party City Halloween variety. These are just minor considerations to illustrate the poverty of production. Special effects are of the cutting edge variety... in 1922. So a decent, if derivative, concept fails at every level, cinematography, direction, writing, acting...craft service (okay, I can't verify the last item). The only frightening element of this series is the fact the episode I forced myself to watch was only 19 minutes long yet feels like it has taken hours from my life... perhaps that is its greatest special effect. Mr. Wood is smiling from beyond...

Five minutes was enough

[evikarmou · 1/10 · 21 October 2018]

The acting was so bad I couldn't keep watching after five minutes.

It's a train wreck.

[cewyble · 1/10 · 23 July 2019]

The acting and dialog is beyond bad. I had to research what network would even air this garbage. Turns out to be a webisode production, and it shows. The premise is interesting and I attempted to watch it but lost interest in the first 3 min.

Filmed with an iPhone

[Sunlizzard · 1/10 · 2 August 2019]

I think this was a bunch of kids got together, wrote what they thought was a script, shot it on their iPhones (yes, even a shot of a shadow of a man holding an iPhone in the scene) and then edited on $40 home software. I don't normally down-rate things, but the title, premise and cover art are very misleading.

I look at it just because...

[aelam-96543 · 1/10 · 20 August 2019]

Some bad movies can be low key good but this movie was made from a Burger King budget I mean it's bad. I look at all three episodes

Cast-off cast?

[pr-36 · 1/10 · 12 November 2019]

Not sure where they pulled the cast from in this awful, low budget timewaster but they have the acting ability of inexperienced amateurs--I'm not ashamed to say that I've seen better acting in porn movies from the guy who came to fix the pipes/fridge/pool etc.--MUCH better.

This is a bit of a shame, because the premise (in the bear future we can clearly see ghosts, and they're aware of us too) isn't actually all that dumb. Unfortunately, non existent production values , inane dialog and the aforementioned woeful acting make this one of the worst things on Amazon--on anywhere for that matter.