This isn't a documentary. I'm trying to understand why this is on IMDb. This is a collection of video game reviews from Youtube. Anita Sarkeesian is the host, sitting in front of a "green-screen" reviewing video games and specifying how she doesn't like them. I assumed it was parody, as it's on Youtube.
I did make an attempt to understand the point of view, but Sarkeesian presents a lot of negative observations:
The series presents "tropes" (which are basically metaphors for some form of expression) versus women. In most points Anita blames society, specifically men, for not enjoying the video games. Although I did notice she ignored the target audience of said games belong to a male demographic.
Anita Sarkeesian labels female characters in specific video games that she herself does not like. Sarkeesian's expertise immediately fell into question, when she admits she "does not like and does not play" the video games she's reviewing.
Sarkeesian arrives with her decisions subjectively; A female character is attractive, that's objectification. This female character needs to be rescued, this degrades her value. This female was killed, this promotes violence against women ... Arbitrary conclusions, heavily criticized, without basis in facts and it's just an incredibly negative experience.
If your familiar with John Bruce Thompson (Jack Thompson) from the 80's then you might understand where this series of video game reviews leads you; Jack was an activist campaigning against violence in video games - notoriously calling it "Behavior Modification". It's that same capriciousness that's applied here, although a bit more irrational in observation than Thompson's - Such as referring to a female hero as just a man with breasts and deeming it a "hatred against women".
It vaguely reminds me of Dana Carvey's Church Lady from the old Saturday Night Live, except it's deadpan serious and way cheaper in production. I understand she was given a quarter of a million dollars from Kickstarter to fund this. It's one still camera aimed at the presenter for the whole time. I'm sure it's worth some value to watch it freely on Youtube ... but never in a school classroom. It's not for children. You'd have to be insane to think this would benefit children.