A serious and thoughtful documentary exploring scientific and logical flaws in the theory of evolution, written and presented by PhD scientists from a range of disciplines.
Schools are being urged to teach evolution as scientific fact – but this documentary clearly demonstrates that Darwin's big idea remains firmly in the realm of hypothesis and surmise. The strength of "Evolution's Achilles' Heels" is that it ranges across all the disciplines influenced by evolutionary thinking – biology, genetics, geology and cosmology – showing how real world evidence just does not tie up with the stories of Darwinism and long-age uniformitarianism. There are key questions that evolutionists have singularly failed to answer and these are all flagged up here. How could organic molecules, and in particular the amazing interrelated assemblage of DNA, RNA, enzymes and proteins in even the simplest cell, have arisen from non-living matter? Confronted with this irreducible complexity – which of course Darwin had no conception of - evolutionists are having to invoke the agency of aliens. Where are the myriad transitional forms which should be observable in the fossil record? How is it that species alive today appear suddenly, in their current form, and have since undergone no change? How can landforms be described as millions of years old when current catastrophic events, such as the explosion of Mount St Helens, can produce them in a matter of days or months? How can natural selection be used to explain an increase in genetic information, leading to more complex organisms, when in fact it can only weed out the "less fit" and thus decrease the amount of information? Mutations damage, rather than add to, the genetic code.
The presenters are not blinkered fanatics throwing reason out of the window, but are careful observers of the physical world whose theories fit the evidence rather better than those of Darwin and Dawkins. Critics – instead of slinging mud at these creationists, take up the challenge of responding to these points in kind with evidence, observation and logical reasoning. And where there are unknowns, be humble enough to admit that the materialist hypothesis requires just as much faith from its adherents as does the story of creation.