Black Eyed Children: Let Me In (2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
First Scene
marigold_bay23 June 2018
It is OBVIOUS the guy interviewing was drunk or otherwise impaired. His speech is slurred, he has no clear focus. His questions are repetitive and rambling and the grammar mistakes made it all the more painful. Seriously, if you are interviewing someone at least know where you are headed.

I'm trying to understand how none of this was noticed during the making of the darn thing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
absolute garbage
mammogramkid31 March 2022
The acting is beyond bad, I had to turn it off because I actually started to get embarrassed for the actors who star in this worthless film. Not one second of the 30 minutes I watched was entertaining in any way at all. I've challenged friends to watch it sober and only one made it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Excruciating Acting
vickyh111723 November 2016
Don't even bother to rent or watch this cheesy film. The acting was excruciating. Totally unbelievable, with the exception of the the black guy at the "lake", although one has knowledge the film is bogus - the black guy was the best "actor" - I can see him with a future in film. SO, my review wouldn't post unless it had 10 lines. What really can I add to this film that would make you want to see it if I'm correct on my take of the film. Please don't waste your $? Please try to cast better actors? What I did find humorous - when the guy that wrote the film - God bless him, the tent scene - even as I type these words I'm laughing because of the tent scene - he thinks he hears "something" outside of the tent -it's a cow mooing. Over and Out!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
*Sigh*
sinnomine-1728229 May 2022
This could have been good if not for the sound, 'acting' and horrible script I'm actually wondering if there even was a script. Don't waste your time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
no "spoiler" necessary
anarisuto23 October 2015
Schizophrenic rambling. I rented this in HD, from my ATT Uverse provider. $6 !!! I should never assume the title of a film has any meaning. You can title a documentary "whales", and then present a two hour film of barnacles growing on someone's dreadlocks. I know that these black eyed children encounters occur, or at the very least, honest people sincerely believe they have experienced this phenomenon. I like to hear about, and try to understand these bizarre, esoteric "things". I like gnarl that makes my skin crawl and hair curl. But!... Substance is important. This is ridiculous. The title of the film should have a modicum of relevance, but Justin Snyder stumbled his way through a film about pond scum.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Faux horror documentary
Leofwine_draca6 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
BLACK EYED CHILDREN: LET ME IN is a faux horror documentary made on no budget whatsoever. It's a simple indie film that cashes in on the brief media craze for ghost stories involving the titular phenomenon. As a film it's extremely low key, featuring almost no supernatural content, just endless face-to-camera interviews with supposed witnesses. The dialogue feels ad libbed and is quite repetitive while the wooden acting really takes the biscuit. It all leads to the usual BLAIR WITCH-inspired mucking about in the woods.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
just so bad
amdewstow14 July 2020
I'm not sure whats worse, the acting or the audio work. It seemed like some people did not even have mics aimed at them.

Do not waste your time on this mess of a high school level video project.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
At least get a disease you've researched
akoqcjapanese4 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Good grief, this crap sucks! They picked some random girl to pretend to be an optometrist and then the black guy they had (I guess they could only have two) played several characters. Horrible acting, fake disease that the writer didn't even research to make sure the symptoms related to the premise of the movie. This is one of the worst fake documentaries I've seen.....seriously unless you like really really bad and not bad it's funny and good, but really bad movies, avoid this crap.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If I made this film I would find a new hobby
JShaft3317 August 2019
That girls vocal fry - holy jeez. I do want the drugs the black guy was on. The filmmaker is a crazy tweaker. Dale saw the childrens. The coolest thing about the film was seeing the lake drained.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Obviously this movie was too smart for the other reviewers
Corpsegoddess18 July 2020
Here's the secret, guys: this is a brilliant send-up of of bad found footage movies.

You have to be very good to be this purposely bad.

Watch it again.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed