Olga Hepnarova was the last woman to be executed in the Czech Republic and for mass murder, no less so don't expect a barrel of laughs. Shot in chilly black and white, (more a wintry gray, in fact), Petr Kazda and Tomas Weinreb's film is a depressing study of a psychotic personality. In the title role Michalina Olszanska doesn't so much act as exists and barely at that. Although she never off the screen it's as if she's been vaporized, living in a shadow where the real person should be. I suppose in some respects the film falls into much the same category as "The Honeymoon Killers" or "Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer" but they were lively, jolly affairs compared to this. With its strong lesbian element perhaps a more fitting comparison would be with "Monster" in which Charlize Theron played Aileen Wuornos. Worth seeing but grim.
12 Reviews
A chilly experience, but still a missed opportunity
centrum9922 April 2016
Rating this movie is not an easy task for me. It has its strengths, but also aspects that I could not digest. First, the black-and-white picture is fine and takes you back to the 1970s. But a movie without opening credits and absolutely no music was somewhat shocking. Actually, most of the movie consists of short, mutually unconnected scenes, where people don't talk, and are just sitting or standing.
Although this "art style" captures the gloomy inner world of Olga, I can not ignore that it is disrespectful to the audience who may have problems to understand, what is actually happening on the screen. The original version reportedly lasted 2 1/2 hours and the editor's digital scissors reduced it on the border of comprehensibility. And I say this as a man who had studied the entire history of Hepnarova and I was able to successfully predict what will follow in the next few minutes. Undoubtedly, the movie will lose spectators due to these insensitive cuts. And that's a pity, because the second half - starting from the massacre through the trial up to the execution - is already filmed in the chilly spirit that I expected.
It is here, where Michalina Olszańska shows her superb performance, and with her, this whole spectacle stands and falls. The probe into Olga's depressing psyche is the true peak of the movie. The filmmakers also try to be authentic and virtually all presented scenes are based on real testimonies, Olga's letters and court documents. It is only in the lesbian scenes, where they apparently exaggerate. For example, Hepnarova was in love with her female colleague, but they have never had any intimate relationship. Even the openly lesbian contact at the disco party is odd in Czechoslovakia of the 1970s - to say the least. (Although it is again inspired by the fact, because Olga liked provoking and was sometimes wearing a jacket on a naked body.)
As a whole, this film biography of Olga Hepnarova is impressive and leaves feelings that will fly you off the handle for many hours. In fact, it is not unusual that during the final credits, spectators remain downright frozen to their seats. However, I am still sorry that the final result could have been even better. If I were in place of the directors, I would take the movie as Olga's retrospective narrative during interrogation. Her own words would cover the "dead spots" in the story and explain her inner feelings. Too late...
Although this "art style" captures the gloomy inner world of Olga, I can not ignore that it is disrespectful to the audience who may have problems to understand, what is actually happening on the screen. The original version reportedly lasted 2 1/2 hours and the editor's digital scissors reduced it on the border of comprehensibility. And I say this as a man who had studied the entire history of Hepnarova and I was able to successfully predict what will follow in the next few minutes. Undoubtedly, the movie will lose spectators due to these insensitive cuts. And that's a pity, because the second half - starting from the massacre through the trial up to the execution - is already filmed in the chilly spirit that I expected.
It is here, where Michalina Olszańska shows her superb performance, and with her, this whole spectacle stands and falls. The probe into Olga's depressing psyche is the true peak of the movie. The filmmakers also try to be authentic and virtually all presented scenes are based on real testimonies, Olga's letters and court documents. It is only in the lesbian scenes, where they apparently exaggerate. For example, Hepnarova was in love with her female colleague, but they have never had any intimate relationship. Even the openly lesbian contact at the disco party is odd in Czechoslovakia of the 1970s - to say the least. (Although it is again inspired by the fact, because Olga liked provoking and was sometimes wearing a jacket on a naked body.)
As a whole, this film biography of Olga Hepnarova is impressive and leaves feelings that will fly you off the handle for many hours. In fact, it is not unusual that during the final credits, spectators remain downright frozen to their seats. However, I am still sorry that the final result could have been even better. If I were in place of the directors, I would take the movie as Olga's retrospective narrative during interrogation. Her own words would cover the "dead spots" in the story and explain her inner feelings. Too late...
Well made but NOT a film the average person would even watch in the first place.
planktonrules9 July 2017
In Prague, Czechoslovakia in 1973, Olga Hepnarová drove her truck through a crowd of elderly people waiting on the sidewalk. Olga's actions were deliberate and planned
.and she ended up killing 8 innocent people in the process. Now, over four decades later, filmmakers Petr Kazda and Tomás Weinreb have brought her story to the big screen—perhaps in light of several similar acts committed throughout the world by jihadists. But viewers of the film need to be a very specific and patient lot, as the movie clearly is not one intended for the average viewer.
The film begins the teenage Olga attempting suicide and as a result being incarcerated in a rather awful mental hospital. While the film didn't make this clear, she apparently was in and out of mental institutions during much of her life. The film then picks up with Olga as a young adult, working and having various sexual relationships. The publicity material for the film describes her as a lesbian and the film also takes that approach, though I read up on her and apparently she was bisexual. I am not sure why they chose to portray her as a lesbian but viewers will see quite a bit of Olga and several of her lovers. Regardless, this is not a film for the prudish.
It is odd that Olga is shown as being so sexual since she also had a very strong hatred for the human race and felt she was the world's 'whipping boy'. The film uses the German word 'prügelknabe'—which I had to look up on the internet and I am mentioning this in case you see the film and find yourself confused by the term. But regardless, Olga hated people and had a very strong persecution complex. And, as a result, she apparently felt completely justified to murder the people at the bus stop.
Now it's obvious that Olga was not in her right mind. She was flat emotionally and intensely angry deep within her. Most would consider her insane. However, she knew what she was doing and simply did not care and admitted this freely in court. So what was the court to do with her?
This is a very well crafted film. The filmmakers used black & white footage which I think was a good move since the story took place in the late 60s and early 70s. Michalina Olszanska also did a superb job portraying the title character as it would not be easy playing someone with so little emotion nor with much connection to others. But this brings up a problem if the main character is this emotionally constricted and the film is told from her point of view, is it an easy film to watch? This is obviously no for most people. You have to have an interest in the subject matter and you have to be very patient, as the film is slow and almost completely bereft of energy. Olga is severely depressed and it is draining, at times, watching her. I was able to stick with this because of my own background as a therapist, though I sure could have done without the vomiting scene early in the film. I have no idea why in recent years filmmakers have decided to show close-ups of folks throwing up and I think this is perhaps taking realism a bit too far. Overall, for the right viewers, "I, Olga" is well worth seeing but for most it's just too much of a downer.
The film begins the teenage Olga attempting suicide and as a result being incarcerated in a rather awful mental hospital. While the film didn't make this clear, she apparently was in and out of mental institutions during much of her life. The film then picks up with Olga as a young adult, working and having various sexual relationships. The publicity material for the film describes her as a lesbian and the film also takes that approach, though I read up on her and apparently she was bisexual. I am not sure why they chose to portray her as a lesbian but viewers will see quite a bit of Olga and several of her lovers. Regardless, this is not a film for the prudish.
It is odd that Olga is shown as being so sexual since she also had a very strong hatred for the human race and felt she was the world's 'whipping boy'. The film uses the German word 'prügelknabe'—which I had to look up on the internet and I am mentioning this in case you see the film and find yourself confused by the term. But regardless, Olga hated people and had a very strong persecution complex. And, as a result, she apparently felt completely justified to murder the people at the bus stop.
Now it's obvious that Olga was not in her right mind. She was flat emotionally and intensely angry deep within her. Most would consider her insane. However, she knew what she was doing and simply did not care and admitted this freely in court. So what was the court to do with her?
This is a very well crafted film. The filmmakers used black & white footage which I think was a good move since the story took place in the late 60s and early 70s. Michalina Olszanska also did a superb job portraying the title character as it would not be easy playing someone with so little emotion nor with much connection to others. But this brings up a problem if the main character is this emotionally constricted and the film is told from her point of view, is it an easy film to watch? This is obviously no for most people. You have to have an interest in the subject matter and you have to be very patient, as the film is slow and almost completely bereft of energy. Olga is severely depressed and it is draining, at times, watching her. I was able to stick with this because of my own background as a therapist, though I sure could have done without the vomiting scene early in the film. I have no idea why in recent years filmmakers have decided to show close-ups of folks throwing up and I think this is perhaps taking realism a bit too far. Overall, for the right viewers, "I, Olga" is well worth seeing but for most it's just too much of a downer.
Powerful experience that stays with you, but something is missing...
PeterPan1581 November 2016
I watched the movie without knowing anything about the real case of Olga Hepnarova and so I didn't know what to expect.
I must say the movie succeeded in creating the atmosphere of depression, social detachment and schizophrenia and portrayed Olga Hapnerova as a very complex and complicated being, and especially the second half of the movie is very chilly and revealing in terms of the personality and especially that part is very well played by Michalina Olszanska.
It is definitely worth watching although, you can't get rid of the feeling that certain things in terms of filmmaking didn't fit quite well into the whole picture.
The movie is black and white, and almost completely without music. That is a very good idea, because it mimics the inner world of Olga and translate it to the audience. Black and white movies can really do the job as with Sindler list or The Turin horse, provided that other elements fit into the mosaic. There were long and still takes which sometimes focused solely on Olga's face, which I found bit odd because sometimes maybe it would be much better to shift to camera focus on people around following her gaze and how she look at the world rather than trying to decipher that from her face. For example in We Need To Talk About Kevin (which has almost identical story- just different context) Lynne Ramsay done excellent job in doing just that by fragmenting narrative and focusing camera on miniscule details of what is significant for the character psyche. Another thing is that the movie felt a bit disintegrated at times. For people that don't know anything about the real case, it's hard to decipher what happened or where are we in the story exactly. It felt kind arrogant to the viewers as it expected that we all know everything about the story already and that the movie works only as a visual media to translate the story fact to fact in the shortest possible time.
Having said all that, this is a powerful movie with great performance at times by the lead actress and with some deep psychological nuances of the character, who you can't help but sympathize with and/or understand on some level. I would definitely add to the WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT KEVIN category where the main character -although antihero and "evil" of the story, has a very complex reasons and personality. Which is great, because in today's society we need more stories and movies that could explain seemingly random or evil acts in such a complex and socially interconnected way. In fact if you know anything about psychology of "evil", you know that it's almost always a reflection of how those murderers were treated either by society or their parents, caregivers or peers. Here I agree with a previous review that, movie as such would benefit much more from more scenes of the family interactions or history (for example in Flashback maybe).
Overall, this is very powerful psychological drama that certainly delivers the chill and a lot to think about. So definitely worth watching.
I must say the movie succeeded in creating the atmosphere of depression, social detachment and schizophrenia and portrayed Olga Hapnerova as a very complex and complicated being, and especially the second half of the movie is very chilly and revealing in terms of the personality and especially that part is very well played by Michalina Olszanska.
It is definitely worth watching although, you can't get rid of the feeling that certain things in terms of filmmaking didn't fit quite well into the whole picture.
The movie is black and white, and almost completely without music. That is a very good idea, because it mimics the inner world of Olga and translate it to the audience. Black and white movies can really do the job as with Sindler list or The Turin horse, provided that other elements fit into the mosaic. There were long and still takes which sometimes focused solely on Olga's face, which I found bit odd because sometimes maybe it would be much better to shift to camera focus on people around following her gaze and how she look at the world rather than trying to decipher that from her face. For example in We Need To Talk About Kevin (which has almost identical story- just different context) Lynne Ramsay done excellent job in doing just that by fragmenting narrative and focusing camera on miniscule details of what is significant for the character psyche. Another thing is that the movie felt a bit disintegrated at times. For people that don't know anything about the real case, it's hard to decipher what happened or where are we in the story exactly. It felt kind arrogant to the viewers as it expected that we all know everything about the story already and that the movie works only as a visual media to translate the story fact to fact in the shortest possible time.
Having said all that, this is a powerful movie with great performance at times by the lead actress and with some deep psychological nuances of the character, who you can't help but sympathize with and/or understand on some level. I would definitely add to the WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT KEVIN category where the main character -although antihero and "evil" of the story, has a very complex reasons and personality. Which is great, because in today's society we need more stories and movies that could explain seemingly random or evil acts in such a complex and socially interconnected way. In fact if you know anything about psychology of "evil", you know that it's almost always a reflection of how those murderers were treated either by society or their parents, caregivers or peers. Here I agree with a previous review that, movie as such would benefit much more from more scenes of the family interactions or history (for example in Flashback maybe).
Overall, this is very powerful psychological drama that certainly delivers the chill and a lot to think about. So definitely worth watching.
A strong will
ferguson-623 March 2017
Greetings again from the darkness. Most youngsters have executed a perfect eye roll on at least one occasion after receiving a dose of parental advice that seemed irrelevant to them at the time. An early scene in this biopic finds teenage Olga listening as her mother says, "To commit suicide you need a strong will, my child. Something you certainly don't have. Accept it." This is a warning shot fired at the audience to be cautious when judging the actions of the last woman executed in Czechoslovakia.
Co-directors Petr Kazda and Tomas Weinred seem to believe that most viewers will be familiar with Olga's story, and presume the film's austere look, lack of flow, and structure of seemingly unrelated scenes will provide a sense of the choppiness and isolation that might explain her otherwise inexplicable actions. Based on Olga's true story and the book from Roman Cilek, the film will have you questioning whether her behavior was the result of horrible parenting, or more closely related to her psychological issues – perhaps even schizophrenia.
Michalina Olszamska (The Lure) delivers a committed performance as Olga, the 22 year old woman who in 1972 drove a truck into a group of people in Prague, killing 8 (all between the ages of 60 and 79). A year later she was hanged, becoming the last woman executed in Czechoslovachia.
The movie focuses on the various elements and key moments of her life – father's abuse, mother's iciness, attempted suicide, treatment in asylum, rejection by a lover – that led to her isolation and feelings of alienation. We sense her internal rage building over time, and her inability to cope or even connect with others; though at times we question whether her troubles are by choice or a result of her treatment it's kind of a twist on the nature vs. nurture debate.
There have been other fine movies that have dealt with a similar theme: There's Something About Kevin, The Omen, The Bad Seed. Each of these deal with the whole good vs evil idea are some kids born "bad" or are they pushed that way? Either way, it's a parent's worst nightmare. This black and white presentation allows us to keep our emotional distance from Olga, and the no frills approach provides a quite chilling reenactment of how Olga ended up sending a letter to the local newspaper announcing her intention to seek "revenge" for the hatred that society had heaped upon her for years.
Co-directors Petr Kazda and Tomas Weinred seem to believe that most viewers will be familiar with Olga's story, and presume the film's austere look, lack of flow, and structure of seemingly unrelated scenes will provide a sense of the choppiness and isolation that might explain her otherwise inexplicable actions. Based on Olga's true story and the book from Roman Cilek, the film will have you questioning whether her behavior was the result of horrible parenting, or more closely related to her psychological issues – perhaps even schizophrenia.
Michalina Olszamska (The Lure) delivers a committed performance as Olga, the 22 year old woman who in 1972 drove a truck into a group of people in Prague, killing 8 (all between the ages of 60 and 79). A year later she was hanged, becoming the last woman executed in Czechoslovachia.
The movie focuses on the various elements and key moments of her life – father's abuse, mother's iciness, attempted suicide, treatment in asylum, rejection by a lover – that led to her isolation and feelings of alienation. We sense her internal rage building over time, and her inability to cope or even connect with others; though at times we question whether her troubles are by choice or a result of her treatment it's kind of a twist on the nature vs. nurture debate.
There have been other fine movies that have dealt with a similar theme: There's Something About Kevin, The Omen, The Bad Seed. Each of these deal with the whole good vs evil idea are some kids born "bad" or are they pushed that way? Either way, it's a parent's worst nightmare. This black and white presentation allows us to keep our emotional distance from Olga, and the no frills approach provides a quite chilling reenactment of how Olga ended up sending a letter to the local newspaper announcing her intention to seek "revenge" for the hatred that society had heaped upon her for years.
depression chic
jimrader13 June 2023
This is one odd item. The film is about an alienated young Czech woman who talks like Raskolnikov on a particularly bad day. Olga is stylistically portrayed by able, photogenic actress Michalina Olszanska who looks a cross between Nouvelle Vague princess Ana Karina and the young Patti Smith. Though always nice to look at, she looks too chic to play the part of a real-life mass murderer, and getting stuck w/ lines such as, "I know I'm a psycho, but I'm an enlightened one," doesn't help matters, nor does a somewhat graphic lesbian love scene, unless you're hard-up for cheap thrills./ Artfully shot in Bresson-like black and white, the film is full of itself, its art-on-the-sleeve approach undermining both its drama and Michalina's dynamism. Still, her memorable performance makes the film semi-worthwhile.
A great insight into a sick mind.
petokadlecik18 September 2016
To fully appreciate this film one probably should have a minimum knowledge about psychiatry and of schizophrenia in general.
The main character in this film, Olga Hepnarova, is IMO one of the best depictions of a schizophrenic person I've ever seen in a movie. In this regard, the movie makers did an extraordinary good job. The atmosphere of the film is dark, yet the individual scenes are often banal and the dialogues short and often flat and trivial. This however is not of disadvantage to the movie as one would expect. It actually helps to unfold to the viewer the deep, but chaotic and hate-focused thoughts that go inside the mind of Hepnarova. The scenes where she contemplates the traumatizing experiences of her life are deep and sad, showing that she is a very complex and deeply thinking person, but at the same time they succeed to NOT depict her as a martyr, which she clearly fails to be. She despises society and is fond to do it a favor (by killing herself) only in her best life-time when she's deeply in love (with her lesbian lover). Hepnarova is evil, but in the movie it looks more like real-world-evil with its full complexity and context, not the common flat movie-evil known from pop-culture. This also adds to the uniqueness of the movie and probably makes many viewers to sympathize with her. Not to mention the great acting by Michalina Olszanska.
I would appreciate more family scenes in the film. I think it would be beneficial for a better understanding of Hepnarova's mind. In particular the roots of her hatred towards her family. But in conclusion I have to take my hat off to the movie makers, they exactly knew what they wanted to deliver and they delivered it. A sad depiction of a sick mind driven to the edge (partially by the society and partially by herself) until the bitter end.
The main character in this film, Olga Hepnarova, is IMO one of the best depictions of a schizophrenic person I've ever seen in a movie. In this regard, the movie makers did an extraordinary good job. The atmosphere of the film is dark, yet the individual scenes are often banal and the dialogues short and often flat and trivial. This however is not of disadvantage to the movie as one would expect. It actually helps to unfold to the viewer the deep, but chaotic and hate-focused thoughts that go inside the mind of Hepnarova. The scenes where she contemplates the traumatizing experiences of her life are deep and sad, showing that she is a very complex and deeply thinking person, but at the same time they succeed to NOT depict her as a martyr, which she clearly fails to be. She despises society and is fond to do it a favor (by killing herself) only in her best life-time when she's deeply in love (with her lesbian lover). Hepnarova is evil, but in the movie it looks more like real-world-evil with its full complexity and context, not the common flat movie-evil known from pop-culture. This also adds to the uniqueness of the movie and probably makes many viewers to sympathize with her. Not to mention the great acting by Michalina Olszanska.
I would appreciate more family scenes in the film. I think it would be beneficial for a better understanding of Hepnarova's mind. In particular the roots of her hatred towards her family. But in conclusion I have to take my hat off to the movie makers, they exactly knew what they wanted to deliver and they delivered it. A sad depiction of a sick mind driven to the edge (partially by the society and partially by herself) until the bitter end.
An excellent film! Another confirmation of the well known quality of Czech cinema.
batemefo16 March 2016
Tackling a very difficult subject in a rigid social environment like communist Czechoslovakia in the 70's, this film has done it great!
The female lead -the very young Polish actress Michalina Olszanska is doing the impossible while portraying an extremely complex character that no-one would otherwise understand or empathize.
The cinematic recreation of the atmosphere of Prague in the early 70's is so true, that this this black & white film looks like it was really shot in the Seventies. Only the stable digital image suggests else.
I do recommend this movie to all sensitive viewers who wish to look deeper in to the human and social issues.
The female lead -the very young Polish actress Michalina Olszanska is doing the impossible while portraying an extremely complex character that no-one would otherwise understand or empathize.
The cinematic recreation of the atmosphere of Prague in the early 70's is so true, that this this black & white film looks like it was really shot in the Seventies. Only the stable digital image suggests else.
I do recommend this movie to all sensitive viewers who wish to look deeper in to the human and social issues.
Nobody heard her silent scream for help, till raged with revenge!
Reno-Rangan4 November 2017
Nowadays, the tactic the terrorists using is to ram a truck into the crowds. Since the automobile revolution, such incidents have been called accidents. But there were some intentional incidents and this is was one of those. If I'm not wrong, this could be the first such event that recorded as early as in the 1973. Olga Hepnarova in her 20s has not had a pleasant life so far. Victim of bullying, family trouble, she left alone to be a loner most of her life. Her sexual life was another obstacle to get along with the society, but she had a decent paying job. And then suddenly, unexpectedly, she unleashes her inner devil.
Like I said, what this film based on was simply another crime. But what's happening right now made it to get into the spotlight. Otherwise, I don't think they would have made this film. Yes for nationally, but Internationally, there would have been less interested in it. Now this story is definitely an international level. Everyone would know about Olga. The actress who played that role was good too.
The film was black and white. Gives a perfect 70s look. Though a little boring film. The screenplay was not engaging enough. There were too many plain scenes like what we see the art films. They should have highlighted more on the bully and other Olga's struggling life, I mean physically. What I saw was leaning towards the side of the story result. The film is not for everyone, particularly being dull presentation makes people turn it down. Otherwise, it's not bad to ignore.
5/10
Like I said, what this film based on was simply another crime. But what's happening right now made it to get into the spotlight. Otherwise, I don't think they would have made this film. Yes for nationally, but Internationally, there would have been less interested in it. Now this story is definitely an international level. Everyone would know about Olga. The actress who played that role was good too.
The film was black and white. Gives a perfect 70s look. Though a little boring film. The screenplay was not engaging enough. There were too many plain scenes like what we see the art films. They should have highlighted more on the bully and other Olga's struggling life, I mean physically. What I saw was leaning towards the side of the story result. The film is not for everyone, particularly being dull presentation makes people turn it down. Otherwise, it's not bad to ignore.
5/10
Solid psychological drama
guisreis7 October 2021
The Loneliness of the Soul
aemdesigner29 March 2023
The movie plunges us into a world of nihilism, where the darkness of the human psyche reigns supreme. It is a portrait of a young woman who is disillusioned with society and driven to commit a heinous crime. The movie explores the depths of human despair and the impact of social isolation on the individual psyche.
Director Tomas Weinreb and Petr Kazda don't shy away from the darkness that engulfs Olga's world. They craft a bleak and unrelenting atmosphere, one that is suffused with a sense of futility and despair. The cinematography is austere and bleak, reflecting the emotional landscape of the protagonist.
The movie presents a provocative challenge to the viewer's values and beliefs. It forces us to confront the darker aspects of the human condition and consider the ways in which society fails to address the needs of its most vulnerable members. It is a stark reminder that the human psyche is a fragile and complex thing, one that can be pushed to the brink of madness under the right conditions.
In movie, Weinreb and Kazda have created a chilling portrait of a young woman who is pushed to the edge by a society that refuses to accept her. It is a powerful reminder of the need for compassion, empathy, and understanding in a world that can be so cold and unforgiving.
Director Tomas Weinreb and Petr Kazda don't shy away from the darkness that engulfs Olga's world. They craft a bleak and unrelenting atmosphere, one that is suffused with a sense of futility and despair. The cinematography is austere and bleak, reflecting the emotional landscape of the protagonist.
The movie presents a provocative challenge to the viewer's values and beliefs. It forces us to confront the darker aspects of the human condition and consider the ways in which society fails to address the needs of its most vulnerable members. It is a stark reminder that the human psyche is a fragile and complex thing, one that can be pushed to the brink of madness under the right conditions.
In movie, Weinreb and Kazda have created a chilling portrait of a young woman who is pushed to the edge by a society that refuses to accept her. It is a powerful reminder of the need for compassion, empathy, and understanding in a world that can be so cold and unforgiving.
no hope to cling
dromasca27 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
For the second consecutive year the cinematheque in my city hosts a Czech Film Festival, and the most interesting film I have seen by now is this work co-directed by Petr Kazda and Tomás Weinreb describing an event that took place more than 40 years ago in what was then Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. It was by all criteria a shocking event, especially for the 'quiet' and 'normalized' Czechoslovakia of the 1970s. Today we would immediately suspect a terror attack, but the roots of crime of the girl who one day drove her truck in a bus station in Prague killing eight people have their origins not in ideology but in a deep personal trauma and in the complete failure of a system that could not perform basic obligations to its citizens, and even less knew how to tolerate differences and deal with the individuals in trouble.
Olga Hepnarova grew up in a mid-class normative family, but was by all criteria a non-normative young woman – rebel, non-communicative, isolated by her school and work colleagues, a lesbian in a society that did not tolerate homosexuality. I found the acting performance of Michalina Olszanska to be superb, she is living within her character, the desperation and mute cry for help of Olga crosses the screen. Can her deeds be pardoned? Hardly so, as eight innocent people lost their lives in an act of violence that she considered to be a revenge on the system. Is the environment she lived in responsible also for her situation? So it seems, as she seems to be permanently looking for something or somebody to cling on, but she finds nothing in the system (doctors, psychologists, companies she worked for) and nobody among her family or the people she meets who can or wants to help. She is described as a schizophrenic, considered herself bullied and persecuted by everybody around, and had a strange detachment between her intelligence and the way she lived, her actions and reality. Only in the last very moment she seems to have realized that that was for real, and of course, that was too late.
Directors Petr Kazda and Tomás Weinreb decided to make this film in the style of the good Czech cinema of the 1960s. This is reflected not only the black-and-white coloring, but also in the approach in describing the daily reality. We are in Czechoslovakia of those times, we see how people lived and the problems they faced, we are faced with the dullness and lack of hope of their lives, but the critic of the system is never explicit . The script is written and the film is made like censorship is still in place. Good story telling, inspired editing, and excellent acting performances make this film interesting, although we know the end (and the Czech viewers know even better the story). It's not easy to watch as this is a grim story with an unavoidable tragic ending, a spiral of fall and desperation that never provides a ray of hope – but those who are interested in the life of that side of the Iron Curtain during the cold war and in good cinema will be rewarded.
Olga Hepnarova grew up in a mid-class normative family, but was by all criteria a non-normative young woman – rebel, non-communicative, isolated by her school and work colleagues, a lesbian in a society that did not tolerate homosexuality. I found the acting performance of Michalina Olszanska to be superb, she is living within her character, the desperation and mute cry for help of Olga crosses the screen. Can her deeds be pardoned? Hardly so, as eight innocent people lost their lives in an act of violence that she considered to be a revenge on the system. Is the environment she lived in responsible also for her situation? So it seems, as she seems to be permanently looking for something or somebody to cling on, but she finds nothing in the system (doctors, psychologists, companies she worked for) and nobody among her family or the people she meets who can or wants to help. She is described as a schizophrenic, considered herself bullied and persecuted by everybody around, and had a strange detachment between her intelligence and the way she lived, her actions and reality. Only in the last very moment she seems to have realized that that was for real, and of course, that was too late.
Directors Petr Kazda and Tomás Weinreb decided to make this film in the style of the good Czech cinema of the 1960s. This is reflected not only the black-and-white coloring, but also in the approach in describing the daily reality. We are in Czechoslovakia of those times, we see how people lived and the problems they faced, we are faced with the dullness and lack of hope of their lives, but the critic of the system is never explicit . The script is written and the film is made like censorship is still in place. Good story telling, inspired editing, and excellent acting performances make this film interesting, although we know the end (and the Czech viewers know even better the story). It's not easy to watch as this is a grim story with an unavoidable tragic ending, a spiral of fall and desperation that never provides a ray of hope – but those who are interested in the life of that side of the Iron Curtain during the cold war and in good cinema will be rewarded.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
