"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Justice Denied (TV Episode 2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
In search of justice
TheLittleSongbird23 June 2022
"Justice Denied" really stuck out at me on first watch, and quite a lot of it stuck in my mind vividly some while after. It came over as a powerful watch with a truly harrowing attack and where justice is rooted for whole-heartedly. Bayard Ellis was one of those characters that compelled me from his first appearance in "True Believers" in all my rewatches of his appearances, just love his authority and how easy it is to see where he's coming from.

While not one of my favourite episodes of 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit', "Justice Denied" has always been to me one of the best episodes of Season 13. Or at least certainly the second half of it, which generally was not as good as the first. Despite it not being perfect by all means, there are plenty of great things and what stuck out as particularly memorable on my first viewing are still particularly memorable. Which is what makes "Justice Denied" a very good and nearly great outing from Season 13.

Beginnig with the very little that was not so good with it, Haden really didn't do it for me here. Never cared for him in any of his appearances, but my indifference towards him had before turned to hatred at the end. Harry Connick Jr is as stiff and charmless as he was in his previous appearances and the chemistry with Mariska Hargitay just isn't there (it never was).

Hargitay though is excellent. As is the ever commanding Andre Braugher, their chemistry together is much more convincing and that was always the case in the episodes he featured in when she was in relationships. The rest of the acting is strong too, with Pena being especially well acted where his pain and anger tore at the heartstrings. It was great to see the team working together with lots to do.

Much preferred Olivia's character writing here than to the previous episode, the initial handling of the case was sloppy and it was easy to be frustrated by her mistakes but it was hard to not feel bad for her at the end (where only the perpetrator and Haden are hateable) and her remorse was believable. The ending is powerful and bittersweet all round, the case's resolution was one of the most satisfying ones of the season in particular. The writing is taut and intelligent and the story does disturb, especially in the opening attack, and keeps one guessing. Did not see the truth regarding the scarf coming.

Furthermore, "Justice Denied's" photography and such as usual are fully professional, the slickness still remaining. The music is used sparingly and is haunting and non-overwrought when it is used, and it's mainly used when a crucial revelation or plot development is revealed. The direction has a lot of nice tension while keeping things steady, without going too far the other way.

In summary, very good. 8/10.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Topic
stratus_phere11 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I'm glad the writers are finally doing more to address the rampant abuse by cops to get confessions and prosecute innocent people. And I'm glad this episode (at least) had a good resolution. Until we, as Americans, are willing to stand up to the abuse by authorities that has led to thousands of innocent people sentenced to prison, we can never move on. We all have come across many crooked cops in our lives, I'm sure there are no exceptions...cops who are willing to bend the law, willing to push civilians around, willing to use their own credentials to have the "blue line" protect its own from the same laws that they prosecute civilians for.

In this episode, Olivia showed just how crazy and crooked cops can get. She practically beat confessions out of two innocent people using threats, coercion, and harassment that lasted over 9 hours straight without food or water. Not only do I not understand how this is allowed in this country, I don't understand how cops like Olivia aren't prosecuted and sent to prison for these tactics. I would absolutely love to see L&O have the guts to send one of its favorite crooked cops to prison for this kind of crap, instead of always giving them a pat on the back in the end.
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Forced Confession and Ammonia Eyes
yazguloner19 July 2021
Olivia faces a lawsuit from her time partnering with Elliot.

She is a perpetrator who managed to get a confession confessed to her crime. She will try to get a similar confession in the story, and when she almost succeeds, Nick stops her. Because both perpetrators are innocent.

Taking statements by frightening them or making them confess is a method used... it still is... It is no different than parents or teachers educating children by scaring them. It does not give permanent results. It triggers the effort to get rid of oppression. Therefore, they tell the superiors what they want to hear.

Because the perpetrator can't stand the pressure, he thinks that no one will believe him and help him, he can confess.

On the other hand, this is how Olivia was trained and gained experience. So is Elliot... They're doing their job.

Olivia paid for this case with the look in the victims' eyes. You'll understand what I'm talking about at the end of the scene

Both perpetrators convicted in this way by Olivia wanted to take revenge on her in the past.

This time, this case is right. The development of technology also provides this. However, Olivia has two more eyes called Amaro. Nick offers her different perspectives. And it helps her see the gray area.

I started watching Law and Order Svu for Nick, whom I adore from Cold Case. I didn't know that he would leave me a cult drama and a brave idol (Olivia Benson ve Mariska Hargitay). This must be the goodness of admiration.

Olivia will mature and her character will grow bigger in her partnership with Nick Amaro.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Benson's case unravels
bkoganbing4 January 2015
This SVU episode really begins 8 years earlier when Mariska Hargitay collared Guillermo Diaz for a rape. He confessed once and then recanted and has been screaming innocent ever since. Now he has top defense attorney Andre Braugher on his side.

With her new partner Danny Pino, Mariska's now looking afresh at the evidence at the request of ADA Harry Connick, Jr. You'll not believe the simple and innocent error made by the NYPD that unravels this whole case and sends them looking for a new perpetrator.

Braugher is right when he says that Olivia Benson has character unlike a lot of cops he deals with. It's not shown better than in this story.
24 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Doesn't make sense
marysammons-4222020 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The whole thing of Ellis using Benson's relationship with David Hayden is ridiculous. They didn't even know each other when Pena was put away. But he would use a trumped up conspiracy theory to get him out? Yes he deserved to get out and it was good to see self righteous Benson taken down a peg. I guess it's tiresome to see them ruin every relationship Benson has. Hayden, Cassidy, Tucker. They even killed her brother last season.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hail the Torturing Hero
susanhathaway30 April 2024
When an especially vicious rape matches the M. O. of an already incarcerated man, Detective Benson loudly insists that it's the work of a copycat, then proudly defends her coercion of a false confession from an innocent man, meanwhile letting the real rapist and torturer go right on raping and torturing multiple victims for eight years. For once, she's acting like a real cop: hotly protesting that a nine-hour interrogation (actually, she conducted only the *last* nine hours of the extended, brutal questioning of the suspect) did or could produce a "good," truthful confession, rather than simply breaking the suspect down until he says what she tells him to say--and what she told him to say turned out to be problematical.--as well as defending anything that results in a conviction, even of an innocent person.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed