The thirst for modus operandis as personality evaluated is a thirst for work appraised formally or maneuvers become out of sync with statements not made making professional responses unpredictable only in statements made thus. That said, if statements are indeed made to keep policy over enterprise to keep profits over cash allegiences of sentiments have to be made allegiance to style as default takeout in the world of guns and roses where biting a bullet killed a dink over ricochets assumed as precedence of predominance precedenced in self appraisal denied therein and thereby. In doing so, collaterals are witnesses in self-appraisal thus for if guilt moved buildings built over not guilty declared the movements of huff may not be enough to keep crowds of engendered double entendre in a quest not for policies, profit, cash, or modus operandis but for victories existential only in one's curious uptake of social enstrangement rooted in obedience subsumed by orders made, registered, or insinuated, in the least.