Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA documentary that takes an alternative approach to dealing with the global warming crisis.A documentary that takes an alternative approach to dealing with the global warming crisis.A documentary that takes an alternative approach to dealing with the global warming crisis.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação
Joe Barton
- Self - Representative, Texas
- (cenas de arquivo)
Ed Begley Jr.
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
John Boehner
- Self - Representative, Ohio
- (cenas de arquivo)
Larry David
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Leonardo DiCaprio
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
John Dingell
- Self - Representative, Michigan
- (cenas de arquivo)
David Duchovny
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Tom Foreman
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Newt Gingrich
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Enredo
Você sabia?
- ConexõesFeatured in The Bolt Report: Episode #10.133 (2020)
- Trilhas sonorasIt Takes A Whole Village
Performed by African Children's Choir
Written by Paul Colwell, Herb Allen, Paul Murphy and John Kagaruki
Published by Up With People
Avaliação em destaque
Someone has to tell it right
After reading the first 3 reviews I decided that a review from someone who has read Bjorn Lonborg - who is an economist (not "a poly-sci guy" as one newspaper reviewer referred to him) - and who has studied the science of global climate change for more than a decade might be helpful.
First off, Lonborg is not a GW skeptic: he thinks it is real, but that the severity has often been greatly overstated, which even the scientists at IPCC will admit. Also, he does not mean that if we spend a few trillion dollars and deprive (by creating large deficits of energy) poor people all over the world of the few things they currently get to enjoy (like adequate food) we will decrease global temperature by 1 degree: he means we will limit the increase by one degree. Big difference. He is pointing out that taking a sledge hammer to the world economy will not really make much difference in temperature, but a big difference to people who will not be able to buy energy at the intentionally increased prices.
Lonborg points out that we will be able to adapt to the climate change, as people and animals have been doing throughout history, as we gradually change from fossil fuels as more desirable technologies mature. Some parts of the world - equatorial zones - may change drastically, but those nearer the poles (Minnesota, Canada) will likely gain a longer growing season and more tillable land.
But, Lonborg's main point is that if we spent these large sums of money and resources on things we can change: hunger, diseases like malaria and AIDS, and clean water, we could bring about some real improvement in the lives of millions of people world-wide.
My studies, which include a discussion with one of the leading scientists at IPCC, lead me to think that Lonborg makes a very good case. I don't know why so many reviewers ridicule Lonborg. This movie, if you really watch and listen, does not deny climate change. It does state that global poverty is not the best way to counteract global climate change.
First off, Lonborg is not a GW skeptic: he thinks it is real, but that the severity has often been greatly overstated, which even the scientists at IPCC will admit. Also, he does not mean that if we spend a few trillion dollars and deprive (by creating large deficits of energy) poor people all over the world of the few things they currently get to enjoy (like adequate food) we will decrease global temperature by 1 degree: he means we will limit the increase by one degree. Big difference. He is pointing out that taking a sledge hammer to the world economy will not really make much difference in temperature, but a big difference to people who will not be able to buy energy at the intentionally increased prices.
Lonborg points out that we will be able to adapt to the climate change, as people and animals have been doing throughout history, as we gradually change from fossil fuels as more desirable technologies mature. Some parts of the world - equatorial zones - may change drastically, but those nearer the poles (Minnesota, Canada) will likely gain a longer growing season and more tillable land.
But, Lonborg's main point is that if we spent these large sums of money and resources on things we can change: hunger, diseases like malaria and AIDS, and clean water, we could bring about some real improvement in the lives of millions of people world-wide.
My studies, which include a discussion with one of the leading scientists at IPCC, lead me to think that Lonborg makes a very good case. I don't know why so many reviewers ridicule Lonborg. This movie, if you really watch and listen, does not deny climate change. It does state that global poverty is not the best way to counteract global climate change.
útil•8812
- Fred-S
- 17 de nov. de 2010
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Охладите! Глобальное потепление
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 62.713
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 26.847
- 14 de nov. de 2010
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 62.713
- Tempo de duração1 hora 27 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente