The first story seemed too far fetched and the reactions of the family seemed odd as well, the second story was better but still left some questions. Both made for good scares though and were fun to watch. However, I don't understand why the actors in these shows never resemble the actual people? Terror In The Woods really hires the absolute WORST actors they can find, do they get them for free, cause yikes?! I have heard that the people they find to be on the show don't get paid very well for their stories, like $100 per person, but you can't find better people to reenact the tales? I don't know how believable both stories were as I don't know of anyone who would knowingly go into the forest where menacing growls have just come from? I immediately disregard stories like the first one, when people use the term, " I seen" instead of, " I saw". Is it really so hard to use proper grammar? The issue I had with the second story was, "why would you go camping in the forest without a weapon to protect yourself from any threat known or unknown?"
I can't imagine anyone being able to sleep after thinking that a werewolf had been outside their tent? Lastly, why is this thought to be a werewolf when no one saw the creature outside and they didn't see tracks that would prove it was dog-like? There were many questions to each of these stories, but they were fun enough.