Reflections of the Past (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A dark and honest investigation into the Parker Hume case.
Pinlight22 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Filmmakers often find themselves living in a world that they are attempting to cover in a documentary format -- people and places coming alive during that process of discovery -- and long forgotten issues revisited. This phenomena was indeed the case for director Alex Roman during his production of Reflections of the Past.

The story of the Parker Hume case -- the murder, and adolescent love affair that the girls eventually had -- are featured in this investigative film that was primarily shot in New Zealand only months before the devastating earthquake in Christchurch. Those shots were all exceedingly crisp HD footage, and now stand as more of the history of New Zealand, a monument to a time now lost forever.

Controversy continues even today as why these girls were involved in such a brutal murder. The film takes us way back to the beginning where life was innocent and these girls suffered both physical and family issues that brought them to the point of being inseparable. This lead to the speculation in those days, which carries on today, on whether they were lesbians. In that regard, the idea at the time, could lesbians be the cause of such a crime? Obviously that conclusion is invalid, but Roman explores the story from the people who were there at the time or that are living now in New Zealand that had some special insights on the way things were. He brings the story back in 21st Century terms.

Yes, there was a Peter Jackson film about the same event, but this is a factual documentary that bares closer attention by anyone who has been intrigued with this case over the years. Roman sought out a suitable collection of both gay and straight on their opinion, and delved into historical data, former friends and teachers, and many others. If you want to get a better understanding of how two girls raised in completely different environments could have collided in a brutal murder, then were banned by royalty to ever see each other again for the rest of their lives, then you need to get a copy of Reflections of the Past. You may find it as fascinating as we did.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The elephant in the room...
Shuggy14 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The enigmatic title hides a thoughtful talking-heads documentary about the Parker-Hulme murder case in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 1954. Roman interviews schoolmates of Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme (who together killed Parker's mother), a son of one of the counsel and others with a close interest in the case.

Others, such as women who have portrayed the girls in two plays, and especially a minister from the Los Angeles Church of Truth (does any church claim to be any other kind?), have less to contribute.

This is enlivened by re-enactments (of dubious value, some Los Angeles folly standing in for Borovnia), the few contemporary newspaper pictures of the girls, diary entries and newspaper footage eked out with special effects, and recent footage of Christchurch, made poignantly historic on February 22, 2011.

The elephant in the room is of course, Peter Jackson's "Heavenly Creatures". At a Q&A, Roman admitted that this was his point of entry to the case, and a hand-held scene near the beginning, running from the murder scene through Victoria Park, echoes that film. It would have been useful to have included some comparison between history and Jackson's embellishments, such as Alison Laurie and Julie Glamuzina provide in the second edition of their book, "Parker & Hulme, a Lesbian View".

Since Jackson's film leads up to the murder, the most interesting material this one adds is about the trial. The law of the day presented a stark dichotomy. Since their guilt was patent and confessed, the only question the jury had to answer was whether they were "bad" or "mad", and the film explores that in detail. It hinges on the nature of their relationship, and how much they were driven by a shared fantasy. This was imposed by the prosecutorial decision to try them together. Much was made of Pauline's diary at the trial (and in "Heavenly Creatures"), but Juliet also kept one, burnt by her mother, and it has become the elephant NOT in the room.

It suits fiction and symmetry that the two girls were equally involved in each other and planned and committed the murder together, but the truth may be more interesting. (Juliet - as Anne Perry - has given at least one interview about the case, but Pauline remains reclusive.) The suggestion arises that, after a lifetime of abuse, Pauline would have killed her mother Juliet or no Juliet, and that Juliet was a (relatively) innocent bystander. Some people are murderers, but some people are murderees.

The film is marred by a dog-wagging tailpiece about whether they were homosexual. For 15-year-old girls with "crushes" on each other, the question is hardly meaningful. That would be better consigned to outtakes, and more use made of some fantastic murals shown briefly near the end, that we are not told was the work of Pauline after her release.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not sure if necessary
blumdeluxe11 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Reflections of the past" deals with a murder case from New Zealand, where two girls were so obsessed with each other, that their possible separation led to the murder of one girl's mother. The film tries to solve what lead to this dramatic decision and which impact this unusual case had on the society of New Zealand.

In general, a documentary about such a case of course sounds appealing because it is a crime that makes you listen up. Therefor I can not say that the topic wouldn't deliver enough content to make an interesting film out of it. My general problem with it, though, is that this seems to be a very private and painful case of murder, where the accused were still children or at least teenagers during the murder. There seems to be a horrible and tragic plausibility within the case and I don't really know if this is a case everyone needs to know about. I would have preferred to let the families have their peace and protect those who had to suffer from the happenings.

The strong moments of the movie are when it deals with the general consequences New Zealand had to face because of this case, and this is also where I think it earns itself at least a bit of legitimization, in so far that this is a step ahead of just a personal tragedy. I don't really like when documentaries replay historical events with actors because it is always kind of a falsification, maybe something drawn would have been also an option, but generally this is where I liked the movie.

It is, by all means, no bad movie. It seriously investigates the case, portrays different opinions and speaks with many people that have something to say. For the reasons above, it is nonetheless not my film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Could of been good
sfelloni2 March 2019
Please get rid of the terrible plonky piano music. Made a mediocre documentary almost unwatchable
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed