अलास्का में उनकी विमान दुर्घटनाओं के बाद, छह तेल श्रमिकों को बचाने के लिए एक कुशल शिकारी नेतृत्व करता है, लेकिन बेरहम भेड़ियों का एक झुण्ड हर कदम पर उनका पीछा करता है।अलास्का में उनकी विमान दुर्घटनाओं के बाद, छह तेल श्रमिकों को बचाने के लिए एक कुशल शिकारी नेतृत्व करता है, लेकिन बेरहम भेड़ियों का एक झुण्ड हर कदम पर उनका पीछा करता है।अलास्का में उनकी विमान दुर्घटनाओं के बाद, छह तेल श्रमिकों को बचाने के लिए एक कुशल शिकारी नेतृत्व करता है, लेकिन बेरहम भेड़ियों का एक झुण्ड हर कदम पर उनका पीछा करता है।
- पुरस्कार
- 2 जीत और 8 नामांकन
Ben Hernandez Bray
- Hernandez
- (as Ben Hernandez)
Jonathan Bitonti
- Ottway (5 years old)
- (as Jonathan James Bitonti)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAccording to Liam Neeson's account, the temperatures were as low as -40 degrees Celsius (-40 degrees Fahrenheit) in Smithers, British Columbia, where the film was shot. The snowstorms/scenes were real prevailing weather conditions, and not a cinematic illusion produced with CGI (interview: एपिसोड #20.70 (2012)). The cast wore thermals under their costumes for additional protection.
- गूफ़Before setting off for the woods, Ottway searches through the plane wreckage and finds his rifle in its case, with the stock broken in two. He then discards the rifle. This is strange as, even with the stock broken and scope ruined, it would be possible to fire the rifle with reasonable accuracy at close range, certainly accurately enough to dispatch a number of wolves.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere's a scene after the end credits.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The Tonight Show with Jay Leno: एपिसोड #20.70 (2012)
- साउंडट्रैकRunning A.D. Part 2
Songwriter Mark Kevin Wilson
Produced by Vintage Masters Music
Performed by Lucian Blaque
Courtesy of Fervor Records Vintage Masters, a division of Wild Whirled Music
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
Good Horror but Not a Wolf Film
An airplane loaded with roughneck oilmen crashes in Alaska and the survivors trek through a snow storm to survive while a pack of wolves kill them off one by one.
Some reviewers loved it. Some hated it. Those who loved it saw a competently directed action horror film in a realistic setting filled with real people facing real threats. Those who hated it saw an unrealistic depiction of wildlife behavior and unworkable outdoor skills. People who loved it thought the movie was realistic. People who hated it thought it was ridiculous.
Without giving away the story, let me tell you that this is not a story about actual wolf behavior. This is more like the numerous movies of the produced through the '70s, '80s and '90s about a group of people picked off one by one by unseen creatures lurking in the dark. In the '70s, they were natural animals like sharks, killer whales, reptiles, furry animals and insects. In the '80s they were space aliens and robots. In the '90s they were super assassins. Lately they are vampires and zombies. Now we are back to furry animals. But the overall theme is the same.
It is refreshing to see this theme played out in the Alaskan wilderness rather than on a space ship or an underground city overrun by zombies. In that sense, this movie is realistic. But the furry animals in the movie behave more like space aliens than actual wolves. The "expert hunter" in the movie is not actually giving you wisdom that will be useful in the Alaskan wilderness. He is more of a generic zombie hunter. In that sense, this movie is unrealistic.
So whether you like this movie or not depends entirely on what you are in the mood to see. If you want Discovery Channel, look elsewhere. If you want to see good acting in a scenic backdrop with lots of scary moments, you will like this movie. You don't have to really check in your brain at the door. Like so many Ridley Scott movies, this one is also a meditation on the nature of fate. This movie is a good piece of fiction. Just a bad documentary.
Some reviewers loved it. Some hated it. Those who loved it saw a competently directed action horror film in a realistic setting filled with real people facing real threats. Those who hated it saw an unrealistic depiction of wildlife behavior and unworkable outdoor skills. People who loved it thought the movie was realistic. People who hated it thought it was ridiculous.
Without giving away the story, let me tell you that this is not a story about actual wolf behavior. This is more like the numerous movies of the produced through the '70s, '80s and '90s about a group of people picked off one by one by unseen creatures lurking in the dark. In the '70s, they were natural animals like sharks, killer whales, reptiles, furry animals and insects. In the '80s they were space aliens and robots. In the '90s they were super assassins. Lately they are vampires and zombies. Now we are back to furry animals. But the overall theme is the same.
It is refreshing to see this theme played out in the Alaskan wilderness rather than on a space ship or an underground city overrun by zombies. In that sense, this movie is realistic. But the furry animals in the movie behave more like space aliens than actual wolves. The "expert hunter" in the movie is not actually giving you wisdom that will be useful in the Alaskan wilderness. He is more of a generic zombie hunter. In that sense, this movie is unrealistic.
So whether you like this movie or not depends entirely on what you are in the mood to see. If you want Discovery Channel, look elsewhere. If you want to see good acting in a scenic backdrop with lots of scary moments, you will like this movie. You don't have to really check in your brain at the door. Like so many Ridley Scott movies, this one is also a meditation on the nature of fate. This movie is a good piece of fiction. Just a bad documentary.
उपयोगी•11739
- dr-h-noguchi
- 26 मार्च 2013
टॉप पसंद
वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए रेट करें और वॉचलिस्ट में साइन इन करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Bản Năng Sinh Tồn
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $5,15,80,236
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,96,65,101
- 29 जन॰ 2012
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $7,97,81,695
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 57 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें