The Proof is Out There (2021– ) User Reviews

Thought provoking investigations with credible experts.

[alanrandall-37292 · 8/10 · 24 October 2022]

I have only watched a couple of episodes of ''The Proof is Out There'' but already find it a compelling show to watch, the experts who comment on each presentation are credible and the host Tony Harris keeps it interesting and moving at a nice pace.

''The Proof is Out There'' is presented like a Court Jury studying the evidence available and then making a decision on their findings, I like this format as it is not the decision of a single person, and you hear the different views of the experts followed by a summing up by the host Tony Harris, leaving you to form your own opinion after considering all that has been said.

Good to hear that it is continuing to a second season, and I will be happy to spend some time catching up on more episodes, recommend for anyone with a curious and inquiring mind.

Am I the only person to notice that Tony Harris always wears gray pants & a black shirt? Lol.

[khoffmann-86297 · 8/10 · 29 October 2022]

First off I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. Having said that am I the only person to notice that Mr. Tony Harris is always in & only ever wears gray pants & a black shirt? Lol. I can't be the only one to notice this! Lol. I love Ya Tony Harris but come on, change up the wardrobe now & then. Lol. Although, in my opinion, you do look mighty fine in those black shirts & gray pants. Thanks for listening to my feedback. I'd absolutely love to hear back from somebody cuz I really do LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. So thanks for bringing something new to watch that studies all of these issues & stories that maybe weren't taken seriously or didn't get reported for fear of not being believed. I appreciate your efforts to bring these issues to light when maybe nobody else took them seriously before. I do know absolutely that there are many more stories out there that haven't been reported for fear of not being believed as well as the fear of being ridiculed for what some may consider as unbelievable tall tales. I say thank u to everyone who chose to continue their fights to be recognized & heard. I hear you & I believe you regardless of if you have proof of your encounters or any way of proving yourself or not & I truly believe that there are more people out there who believe you more than not & the people who dont believe you usually they are the people in a position to know if these things are happening or not.

Almost a great skeptical weird phenomena show...

[drdaverob-576-886207 · 7/10 · 19 September 2023]

So, I enjoy scientificly geared shows about strange events and phenomena... Ufo, Bigfoot etc. But this has a slight bias towards the truly wacky theories they barely need to present. Many "experts" are pretty good at explaining what's happening as normal, natural etc, but I'm not sure the show is really trying so hard to fully evaluate every video or photo. Maybe it's just me, but any history channel show that talks about ancient aliens before the reasonable archeological or anthropological explanations is filling up time or perpetuating Graham Hancock nonsense. Still a good way to find "urban legend" or famous alleged phenomena.

Better than the majority of mystery solving programmes

[johnlittlewood · 4 May 2022]

I agree with a lot of reviews here about the programme being more serious about its investigations than most. The team do their best to come to a realistic conclusion after the analysis. Some shows cater to the supernatural explanation rather than looking at all angles. Most verdicts have been pretty much what I suspected, and the biologist who basically debunked the Patterson Gimlin film is a hero in my eyes. She stated the same common sense piece to camera as I had suspected all along. Basically, as a wild animal it should have either confronted the pair or retreated quickly......fight or flight. What did it do.......a casual look over its shoulder and then a slow stroll into the bushes. Totally the wrong actions, and clear evidence of the farce in a hairy suit !!

Monster in the Attic, Houston UFO and Utah Bigfoot episode -

[weasel-77082 · 7/10 · 27 January 2024]

While watching tonight's episode, I saw the clip of the 3 rows of lights where the right most light on each row would go out, and be replaced by another light at the far left of the remaining lights. After watching the deliberations, the resulting verdict was that the lights are military flares, but I beg to differ with that theory, because if they were military flares, they would drop due to gravity, but none of these lights are dropping.......they are all moving in a straight line. And when a fighter jet releases flares, they don't normally release 1 flare at a time, they launch several! I have no idea what these lights are......but I highly doubt that they are military flares!

I find this show occasionally tries to debunk potential genuine UAPs.

Finally a show show that doesn't dramatise

[kram66 · 9/10 · 19 October 2021]

I'm a skeptic and think there are logical explanations for most things. One thing I love about this show, is they don't try and build some BS like other shows. They separate the BS from the true unexplained. Great show!

One of the best....

[juliefrein · 9/10 · 17 July 2021]

I am a believer in the paranormal/supernatural. I love to watch programs which deal in 'is this fast or fiction'. An annoying aspect of many programs is the way the scenes are edited with anxiety-causing sounds as part of the transition. This show does not play any of those tricks with sound and/or using strobing. The best part of the show is watching them present the photo/video//sounds then they have respected specialists look at them using their tools to do their analysis. Great job! I hope this show continues to a second season.

Not enough investigation!

[tysonjust · 5/10 · 20 September 2021]

I enjoy watching this show, but I feel like if they're doing a story on something that may be difficult to "prove" or distinguish between fact or fake the do not do enough investigation. If the subject is easy to come up with an explanation for, they do a good job discussing what the phenomenon actually is. But, with things that don't have an actual explanation right away they just write off as "unexplained phenomenon" or stop investigating and just SAY it can be explained. I wish they would continue investigations on harder to prove things until they get an actual explanation, or at least narrow it down to a few choices.

Finally a paranormal show for logical people

[kelani · 10/10 · 29 October 2022]

This show is like a beacon in a world of paranormal genre shows that cater to sensationalism, fabrication, fake experts, and reality-esque dramatization.

Tony Harris works well in this as a narrator, although his claim of being a journalist is a bit suspect. He calls it like the experts see it, and isn't afraid to get a little snarky when hoaxes are involved. That's perhaps my favorite part, because the only thing worse than the current paranormal genre is all the people muddying the waters by creating hoaxes for YouTube hits.

In another refreshing change, the experts are actual experts in their fields, not amateur or armchair types blabbing opinions or pseudoscience. They have credentials, credibility, and really know what the hell they're talking about.

I don't understand why some people are so upset when the verdict is "unexplained phenomenon", because frankly, that's exactly what they are. Further investigation might change that, but for the purposes of the show, that's really the only place they can leave it. It's also silly to expect this show to go beyond its scope and further investigate these cases. That's not what this show is about. The experts are simply giving their time for the show, and probably have no time or desire to leave their day jobs hunting for answers to this stuff.

All in all, it's a great show. I really love seeing video clips that have been labeled "100% authentic OMG paranormal" on other shows being debunked by science, logic, technology actually used properly, and common sense.

Another show who lead presenter lies about this background!

[cdeanroane · 1/10 · 9 October 2021]

Just like Josh Gates leaves out of opening if his shows that he majored in drama in college but tells the audience instead he is archaeologist and adventure. Tony Harris says in the opening of this show he is a journalist! When he is in fact an actor and producer, where his acting include the Medea and other comedies a far cry from journalist! So take every thing he says on this show not a grain, but a barrel of salt! You are better off watching Strange Evidence or What On Earth. Tony Harris in this as useless and unneeded in this as Laurence Fishburne is in History's Greatest Mysteries. Thankfully this is only 30 minutes not the 90 of History's Greatest Mysteries!

Tony Harris does such a good job

[judekrepin · 10/10 · 16 July 2022]

Tony is great.

This show is well produced and has many topics of interest.

With as many shows that are out trying to entertain us, I found that this is one worth watching.

I'm a fan.

Tony Harris

[lvnuthouse-59227 · 9/10 · 9 October 2022]

I believe Tony Harris is the real deal. He calls them as he and experts see them. No sugar coating, no bs analysis, he's not fake. I gave Him and the show a 9 was because there were some things blatantly obvious and they called it unexplained. Other than dat, Tony Harris is genuine and give the show two thumbs up! Congratulations on the new season. Im glad to see the show made it for another season. If you don't like it, don't watch! Don't be bagging on Tony Harris for doing a job, that's fun and trying to show the public, some of the most bizarre crazy a** sh't, thats out there. That's what its all about! Get it! Some of the weird a** experts still are experts and I trust what they say to be true. Unlike the News, there's at least video, were the news would say a unnamed source, now that's BS!

Waste of Time

[piggygirl-76439 · 2/10 · 22 January 2022]

I have seen a few episodes of this series and I have to say that anyone can get into a bigfoot costume and walk across the road in the 90's and even now. A random noise can be reasonably explained, such as a generator, a lawn mower or a car that needs some major repairs. If I wanted to I could find many of the videos they use anywhere on the internet, for example, an airplane "frozen" mid air can be found anywhere on the internet.

Sasquatch

[lovemyson-61369 · 10/10 · 30 October 2022]

I get so tired of people saying the Sasquatch is an ape, and that is the furthest from the truth the Sasquatch is a human species you shave his hair off and he's a big ass man. He is a species or a subspecies of human which has been around for a very very long time since the beginning and we have just grown and outgrown him he has stayed in his Lane to continue his way of life but they are not animals they are human beings. And I just get so tired of everybody saying that they're ape a form of a ape a form of this animal or that animal calling them creatures and animals they are just a subspecies of human with a lot more smart than we got.

After 10ep, figured it out.

[morewaysthanone · 1/10 · 11 February 2022]

I actually liked this show for a while. Looking forward to the next episode. When conclusions started being inconclusive, my interest waned and I watched the dvr when convenient. Now after the clearly passe conclusions of yesteryear, I'm convinced this is just a mouthpiece of the msm just to make a buck. Too bad so sad.

Saw creature in south florida

[spaldini-65892 · 10/10 · 14 November 2023]

I watched this video closely as I lived in Florida for over 13 years. The creature in question is in TBE process of killing a manatee. When the video is slowed you can clearly see the fan of its tail sticking up in the air. So the conclusion of this belong a large snake is not possible. I find the marine biologist really doesn't seem to spend any time actually investing any videos she comments on. Her views frankly seem a bit lazy. I love the show and watch every episode! I think you all do a great job personally. Not EVERY expert is as through as others but over all keep it up! I hope your show stays on for many yeats!

A remake of an old TV show from 1980?

[jfoovb · 1/10 · 13 July 2022]

It sure looks like a remake of a 1980 Yorkshire Television mini series called Arthur C Clarke's Mysterious World!!

It will be interesting to compare and see the two shows back to back.

Reverse Psychology

[Theguy1561 · 1/10 · 19 January 2022]

This show uses obviously fake and ridiculous footage to get people to lose interest in UFO phenomena. Quite probably the biggest waste of time on tv - next to Oak Island.

Not much of negativity

[mitchryder1953 · 2/10 · 4 December 2021]

Watched the Bigfoot episode. 3 experts that are pro Bigfoot analysts tell you the Patterson Gimlin is real. They didn't have anybody that would debate the film with them. So it was a one sided analysis. Made in 1967 and nobody since has filmed a better film or pic? Even though millions of people have cell phones. Roger Patterson was a showman and a film maker. The film is a fake, and to prove it Bob Gimlin wasn't in on the hoaks, because You need a witness.

90% Nonsense.

[kchiasson-77464 · 1/10 · 5 March 2022]

So it gets 1⭐ to represent the 10% of sense.

And I'm not just hating because I would like to see the show cancelled - that's the actual content of the show.

It's your call.

Mouth piece for MSM.

[lepadinis · 1/10 · 28 January 2024]

Straight up gaslighting the public, for good measure mixing in the obvious hoaxes with ruling true phenomena as hoaxes, cheek to call 'Agenda 21' as a hoax when they even have a website complete with all nefarious agenda in there and naming the culprits boldly.

There are lots of vids out there they can use to gaslight the public but using people's grievances of loved ones and calling them hoaxes..? All time low (but they've been doing that pretty hardcore incessantly)

...Oh and complete with "experts" as 'high-priests' The only good thing about this pantomime is how obviously they're scrambling to control the narratives, and hopefully the sleepwalkers who have some discernment will start researching rather being told what their Tell-a-vision tells them to think and beLIEve.

Shockingly bad! Scraping the barrel and drawing out the inevitable 9/10 normal answer

[richardtomlinson-27920 · 1/10 · 24 September 2023]

Only in America!...

Anyone with half a brain can figure most of these out and my god they really do seem to be aiming this at school children!

I've just wasted seven minutes of my life to be told that a mysterious noise that happened over three states at the same time was a sonic boom from an aircraft!!!

Could it have been a UFO, "sqyquakes"?, could it have been the government that did it??

No, it is exactly what it sounds like and what anybody with half a brain could tell you - It is a sonic boom from an aircraft caught on someone's outside garden camera.

They did eventually agree with that (after "expert analysts" weighed up the different theories they'd made up!) - dragged it out to seven minutes of absolute rubbish, talked first!!!

Makes me so glad I'm not American if this represents a % of their target audience!!

UFO over some of the rock

[sherrysantiagoss · 1/10 · 6 July 2022]

I had seen this clip before and believe that it is a UFO showing itself to the world. This show is always debunking everything and I think it's total BS... they call it disinformation and the government has been using it for at least 50 or 60 yrs. If not more my analysis of this show. It's not real they still aren't going to tell us the truth I don't know what they are waiting for.

Unbelievable

[myvhzw · 4/10 · 31 March 2024]

Guys, I gotta say something, I just watched S4 E1 the Bigfoot files, this show needs new " so called experts " this wildlife biologist Steffanie Manka wouldn't know a Bigfoot if one picked her up and carried her away.! That primate swinging in the trees, she called it a bear cub, there isn't a bear in existence that can swing thru branches like THaT animal did, 2nd, that Primate, that she referred to as ALSO a bear, that was thought to be a younger Bigfoot because of its non pronounced butt, was obviously a primate of some sort, not an orange tang but something similar... no bear can roll and twist and turn like THaT animal did .. what... is everything she sees a bear.? I've studied wildlife for 60 years... and if you're going to call yourself an expert, ya better have a little knowledge before looking like fool. And you NEVER did-believe the existence of something, unless you can 100% PROVE it doesn't exist. Bigfoot exists, it's out there, I've seen them. Period.