Let's be honest, they blew it with Part one, regardless of your view on the casting, it played out like an amateur dramatics production, and was riddled with mistakes throughout.
First of all, I'll start with the major positive, Jodie Turner Smith, I truly thought her acting was excellent, she stood head and shoulders above everyone else, I felt her passion and desperation, but once again the script just lacked a joie de vivre. Mark Stanley's characterisation of Henry was a little disappointing, again the a script did him no favours.
This was better than the first episode, and I can see what they were trying to do, there is a glimpse of something here, there are snippets of a good story, more effort clearly here, to tell a story, it's just all a little too late.
Flippantly I expected Anne to be tucked up with Anne of Cleves, or getting her teeth whitened with Catherine Parr.
In summary, it good?.....not really, is it better than the first episode?..... massively!!!
Maybe if they'd made a fictional drama, with made up names, it would have faired a lot better, it's just hard to associate any of this with history.
A drama such as this should be lavish, and decadent, it promised to be daring, and bold, sadly despite an improvement, it's still weak, 4/10.
One more to go, I'm glad it's not a six part series.
First of all, I'll start with the major positive, Jodie Turner Smith, I truly thought her acting was excellent, she stood head and shoulders above everyone else, I felt her passion and desperation, but once again the script just lacked a joie de vivre. Mark Stanley's characterisation of Henry was a little disappointing, again the a script did him no favours.
This was better than the first episode, and I can see what they were trying to do, there is a glimpse of something here, there are snippets of a good story, more effort clearly here, to tell a story, it's just all a little too late.
Flippantly I expected Anne to be tucked up with Anne of Cleves, or getting her teeth whitened with Catherine Parr.
In summary, it good?.....not really, is it better than the first episode?..... massively!!!
Maybe if they'd made a fictional drama, with made up names, it would have faired a lot better, it's just hard to associate any of this with history.
A drama such as this should be lavish, and decadent, it promised to be daring, and bold, sadly despite an improvement, it's still weak, 4/10.
One more to go, I'm glad it's not a six part series.