Frozen Flesh (Video 2008) Poster

(2008 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Terrible.
Movieboy_2019 August 2008
If you can watch this P.O.S to end, you deserve a pat on the back.

This the single worst horror film ever made. There are seven scenes in the whole film, one of which that includes a man stabbing the air for seventy minutes.

Also, There is no real story and the red tone color gave me a headache.

Overall, there is nothing much else to say about this mess. It can hardly even be thought of as a film, just random shots of nothing.

Please take my warning: Never (and I mean never) even consider watching this trash.

Justin French = Talentless hack.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A torturous waste of time.
HumanoidOfFlesh16 August 2008
Frank Gillis plays the mass murderer.Watch him cook and eat his victims right before your very eyes.The director of "Frozen Flesh" proudly claims that his film is the most explicitly gory,shocking,bloody and controversial movie ever made.A bunch of lies!I have seen thousands of horror movies and I'm very tolerant when it comes to low-budget indie horror,but literally nothing happens in "Frozen Flesh".We see our mass murderer,who is trying to cook the hand of the victim and it takes him almost an eternity to do this.We see boiling faucet,we see severed hand and flies on it,we see faceless killer breathing and stabbing the air.We feel incredibly depressing boredom.No gore,no nudity,no suspense-just static shots filmed with a red lens filter.I can't believe that I subjected myself to such nightmarish piece of garbage.1 out of 10.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst movie ever made.
anya_d4 October 2008
what a piece of junk!!... after reading all those reviews that warned me about this horrible movie, I decided to watch a bit for myself. So I have to say that I only wasted 10 minutes of my life... and how I regret it...

don't watch it, is not even worth seeing out of curiosity

It is sad that the director has no sense at all, and on top of that he comes here to say it is the bes movie ever. I think the director should consider getting another career.

do not watch this movie

The director wrote that he reinvented horror genre, yes you did, you invented a whole new category of bad movie making. seriously it was the most stupid movie ever.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A meaningless mess of useless images
Shattered_Wake4 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know what to say about this. It's 112 minutes (relatively long for modern low-budget horrors) and contains about seven different camera shots. That's it. Not to spoil it for you (but who the hell will watch this anyway? Other than me). . . but, we see (and I kid you not): A flame, then a faucet, then some blood (I assume) running down a drain, then a pot of boiling water into which something (Ramen?!) is placed (we actually watch the water go from still to boiling. . . the entire duration), then a pile of pancake batter or mashed potatoes or something, then a severed hand is placed in a baking dish and covered in what looks like chocolate syrup and dirt and pee, then we finally see the murderer who looks like a pirate/executioner hybrid, the murderer begins to stab the air, and that's about it. . . you get the point. I'm not entirely sure what to think of it. . . it's just terrible. It did its job in confusing me, but it's not the film that confused me. . . I'm just confused about what the hell was the point of even making this? It's like some college kid decided to videotape making food in his dorm and try to pass it off as a horror film. The music was awful and made my cats run out of the room, the red glow was annoying as hell and made the film look even worse than it would've without it. It wasn't shocking or offensive. . . it was just stupid. Either this kid is seriously messed up in the head, was on some heavy drugs, or just wanted to screw with people. . . Whatever it was, it's not worth watching. If there's an audience for this film, I do not want to meet them.

Final verdict: 0.01/10. Welcome to my bottom two.

-AP3-
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Literally the WORST movie ever made!! Don't WATCH!!
everett_n_lloyd5 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Bottom line avoid at all cost and don't believe the tag-line. This movie was an hour and 51 Min. of about 10 images almost still frame shots with the worst musical score ever composed, all filmed with a red lens filter. The writer/ director and anyone involved should never touch a camera again. The two people who gave this movie a ten were obviously the director/ writer and probably his only friend, or he made two accounts. If you do decide to watch this film then it will be your (as well as mine) first time watching water come to a boil. TERRIBLE TRASH. I am writing this as Im skimming through it.

The first 20 min (Seriously) is a still of a candle burning which then cuts to a sink with running water and what looks like ketchup being poured into it, then you witness water come to a boil on a stove. after that you see some kind of substance looks like pancake batter being poured into a pan. The next 30 min you watch a hand in an oven thats all there Then it cuts to "the Killer" who sits and breaths hard for about 10min. then its just 10 more min of him moving his knife up and down in a stabbing motion and brandishing it about, back to breathing hard and sitting for another 15 min or so. Back to the stabbing sequence only now in slow motion for the remaining 35 min and thank god the movie is over THIS IS THE WORST MOVIE EVER MADE
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ahh... Finally something that could rip the quantum vacuum.
DashTheGreat21 August 2008
"Frozen Flesh" was so awe inspiringly bad, based solely on the fact that it wasn't actually a movie. It was a guy moving a knife up and down for 100 minutes. I was, however, shocked that somebody could sit there that long without developing severe back pain, or possibly scoliosis. I have my doubts that this movie was actually serious.

Let's see. Not much to review here. A guy picks up a knife, and... uh... knifes. The end. Movie over. I have just saved you 140 minutes of your time. Is this one of those subliminal propaganda movies, or possibly a movie designed to torture terror suspects until they go insane? I suspect such is true. It could be a signal to the Caped Crusader, or something of that nature. We'll never know.

So, thank you Justin French, for almost wasting 140 minutes of my life (was more like 5 - thank heavens for fast forward on YouTube!) I'm not even sure what the point of this movie was, or why anyone would spend any time making it? Why? Why!!!???
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst movie of my life!!!!
kaspanatola13 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I AM TRULY SHOCKED!!! The movie is to, avoid at all cost. It's just Terrible. So tedious and pathetic that it disrespected everyone. The Fact is, i don't quite know where to start with the lame attempt at a Horror film that "Frozen Flesh" is. About 6 or 7 different camera shots. A flame, then a faucet then some liquid chocolate running down a drain. Oh my god!! Then a pot of boiling water we watch the water goes from still to boiling. There is a man who looks like a thief. And that's it. Everything in this movie is awful. There was nothing stimulating about this movie. PURE Trash, garbage, junk. Don't waste your time on this trash so called "movie".
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Buyer beware!
UneOmeletteFromage22 May 2009
First of all, in case you haven't read anything about Frozen Flesh, it's not really a movie according to any popular or professional definition of that word. It is merely a two-hour string of looped footage that includes a candle burning, water boiling, a mould of a human hand baking in the oven with several different kinds of powder, a cake (?) being baked, and a masked man repeatedly stabbing the air. Sorry if I spoiled your fun on that one, please don't report me.

So it's just a dumb so-called movie that some kid, alias Justin French, made in his spare time, right? Who cares? Well, if you've bothered to look this movie up on amazon.com, you'll notice that it is for sale -- for TWENTY DOLLARS. Now, I don't know whether French is really letting people buy this movie, especially since he has said in his own words that this film is intended as a joke (see message boards). However, I did see several irate comments on the sale page, indicating that some people may have been ripped off. If the least of evils is true, French has merely produced the worst cinematic turd I have ever had the displeasure to smell. However, if he is really selling this movie to ignorant people, then he is a scam artist and a fraud, who ought to be ashamed of himself. I don't care what IMDb says, if he's selling it without telling people what it really is ON AMAZON.COM, he's a phony who ought to be arrested.

Whichever, no movie has ever incited so much hate within me. This is one of the few movies that has ever made me angry. I was angry that Mr French found it amusing to waste my time with his experiment in human psychology. I was angry at his cocky attitude in the forums. I was angry that he promoted his film with fake critical reviews. But above all, I was angry that he dared list this garbage for sale on Amazon. According to French himself, the purpose of this film was to demonstrate how audiences react angrily to aspiring film-makers' works. Success.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The flesh is a lie!
jawramik23 May 2014
Just in case this is the first you've heard of this "film": This is not a real movie. It is, apparently, an attempt at a practical joke. All the "reviews" quoted on the poster are completely fabricated by the director, and there is absolutely nothing to be gained from watching this "movie."

Let me start by saying that I enjoy a good joke at the expense of others as much as the next d-bag. At least in principle, I'm totally on board with the notion of playing a joke on all the dumb wannabe film critics that have infested the internet, who think that posting a bunch of irate, vitriolic movie reviews rife with spelling errors will make them look smart. Such people frequently complain about how these sub-par films have "wasted" their time, as if they would have used that time to find a cure for cancer if only the awful filmmakers of the world weren't forcing them to watch all these worthless movies.

Needless to say, I'm generally supportive of any scheme designed to take such people down a peg, and as I understand it, Frozen Flesh was intended to be just such a scheme. In my opinion, it wasn't a complete failure in that sense. If you poke around a little on any film/horror review website, you're bound to find page after page of angry, indignant "movie buffs" ranting and raving about how director Justin French has wasted their time an violated their brains.

But that doesn't make Frozen Flesh worth watching. It may very well be the most pointless, least worthwhile sequence of images ever caught on camera. Regardless of the director's intent, Frozen Flesh is a spectacular cinematic failure, and no amount of amusingly angry pseudo-critics is going to change that. In fact, it's so bad that it actually gives some credibility to those infuriated reviewers, which is where I start to take issue with it. While I can see the humour in playing a joke on self-important morons who take themselves too seriously, nobody likes being lied to, and that seems to be exactly what Justin French set out to do in making this "film": he blatantly deceives viewers "for the lulz," and that's pretty tasteless and mean-spirited, even by my standards.

At the end of the day, what Frozen Flesh really amounts to is a film that's not worth watching, and a joke that's not that funny. Even if you're not going to find the cure for cancer, your time would be better spent doing anything other than watching Frozen Flesh.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wanna See Something Shocking? Well Look Somewhere Else!
moviewizguy17 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing can prepare you for the shocking experience of FROZEN FLESH - the most NON-explicitly gory, NON-shocking, NON-bloody, and NON-controversial movie ever made!

This movie...well, is it really a movie? No, it isn't. I swear to you, if these type of "movie" can be released by a distributor made by the person who made the movie himself, the film-making business will die. I mean it. I have never hated a movie so much in my life! If you think you saw the worst movie ever made, you ain't seen nothing yet! Where did I hear about this "movie"? On the horror boards on IMDb. I just wanted to see the movie to see what all the fuss is about. What I didn't realize is that I would see the worst "movie" ever created! God, I'm just speechless. I hated it! It's so boring and pointless!

What this "film" basically shows through the 112 minutes are the following: A sink running on water, a water boiling (and yes, you see the whole process!), a cooking hand (and yes, you see the whole process!), a masked man literally breathing in half-speed for God knows how long (I skimmed through the film and still saw the same actions), and last but not least, the man stabbing air in half-speed until the end of the film!

There you go! I saved you 5 minutes of your time from skimming through the "movie" on Youtube! Everything in here is so horrible and laughable. You would actually think this is a real movie because freaking Amazon is selling the movie online for $20! Please, people, do not bring yourselves upon to see this "movie" for the torturous 5 minutes you are willing to skim through the "film." Time is too precious and life is too short.

This is literally THE WORST "movie" I have EVER seen in my ENTIRE LIFE! No spoof films and Uwe Boll movies can beat that! For a message to the director, Justin French: Please go to a mental institution if you think this is a great horror film. Please, just stop your lies. The arrogance and ego in you just shows how idiotic and pathetic you are to selling this movie.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Well it's about time...
Montazzle17 August 2008
In this day and age of countless remakes and sequels, it's so refreshing to see someone with the balls to do something new, different and daring. Justin French has single handedly reinvented the horror genre on a minuscule budget, but what the film lacks in finance, is more than made up for in innovative scare technique. Not since Carpenter's Halloween or Raimi's Evil Dead have we seen such genuine ingenuity, not to mention a natural flair for knowing how to scare. Cinematographically comparable in style to Nosferatu (1922), the film slowly draws us into it's world of madness and psychosis, as we're introduced to what will probably become the next great franchise serial killer, ala Freddy, Jason etc. The performance given here by the clearly talented Frank Gillis, playing the part of 'The Mass Murderer' will no doubt serve to raise his career high among the greats of Hollywood. It's a little early to tell yet if we're looking at an Oscar nomination, but I wouldn't be surprised one bit. It's the careful balance struck between actor and director (think DeNiro and Scorcese, Burton and Depp) that really makes this film work. But there are many layers to this film. Rich in subliminal social commentary and musings, the film speaks to the subconscious in all of us. Frozen Flesh will not be for all tastes, with it's shocking and ofttimes brutal violence, but cinema should be challenging and demanding, and if that's what Mr French set out to do, he has succeeded admirably. The future of horror has arrived. 10/10
11 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I understand the poor ratings. Poor, poor souls...
EatMyFlickboxers8 November 2013
You know what we learned kids? If you don't have talent, then DON'T MAKE A MOVIE. You don't want to end up like Justin French! That's right, kids! I'm talking about the guy behind this piece of dump. He's made some, oh not good, but not bad, but REALLY boring and the most awful sheet I've ever witnissed. What is this anyway? I can't watch this any longer. I had high hopes for this film, thinking it would be another one of those cheesy gore movies. Plot? It claims to have a killer burglar cooking and literally eating his victims. This could be one of the most best things to ever come to film, but what do we get? 112 fricking minutes of NOTHING! How do these films get made? Just how? Justin does show some hints and facts that he REALLY doesn't even try at all. Also why is the only character in this movie named "The Mass Murderer"? He does no killing at all, but only swings at the air at the not bloody knife, that we're supposed to believe that's the victim, but this movie has only one actor, so we'll just say he's swining at no body. The whole movie... Well what do you wanna know? It must be seen to be believed! Now let's get to the effects. The only budget put into this movie is that fake hand you can always get at a halloween store, and chocolate syrup poured into a sink, thinking that's blood. So, what to say about this. IT SUCKS IT SUCKS IT SUCKS THE END.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Can I rate this a zero?
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki22 October 2008
Let's begin with the opening credits: each title stays on screen for about 45 seconds each: the title itself, the production credits, which consist of only the name Justin French repeated several times, then a lengthy shot of a burning candle, which goes on for two-and-a-half minutes! then a lengthy shot of someone playing with a dripping faucet and water running down the drain, then chocolate syrup spiraling down the drain, which must go on for nearly ten minutes.

And there is no less than two hours of this spellbinding masterwork.

The director/ writer/ producer/ cinematographer/ editor/ composer of this two hour sleeping pill (who was supposedly only 19 years old when he came up with this one) claims that he had something to say about how very lousy movies can be filmed and distributed, often times on a minuscule budget, and that by doing so does not necessarily make one a "film maker", and that just simply moving to L.A. and releasing something also does not mean that one is a "film maker". But any point he might have had is drowned out in these two hours of LENGTHY shots of, well, basically nothing. The movie is basically about a half dozen lengthy (silent) shots of absolutely nothing happening, besides a candle flickering endlessly, water boiling in its entirety, a hand playing with a dripping faucet, etc., filmed through the deepest red filter on the face of the earth and stretched out as long as possible, and then shown even longer for maximum torturous effect. During the "boiling water" sequence, what sounds like an electric razor is dubbed in loudly in the background, the rest of the soundtrack is pre-recorded noises, which sounds like a five-year-old child playing around on a keyboard bought at a flea market in 1981.

In the last sequence, a "Mass Murderer" with a butcher knife, wearing a Freddy Kruger-like striped shirt stabs at the air and at some off-screen object in slow motion endlessly, before we are shown the exact same scant production credits in the exact same slow-as-can-be manner as we had at the start. This "Mass Murderer" (who, not that this matters, is never actually shown killing anyone) hides his face behind a black stocking, and for good reason.

Like some sort of experimental film Andy Warhol might have done back in the 1960s, only much, MUCH worse. It actually did remind me of Warhol's 'Empire' (the eight hour film consisting of a motionless shot of the Empire State building) in that it shows endless shots of nothing happening, with no real point to any of it.

This can legally be viewed for free on at least two movie download sites. Go ahead, watch it. Or try to anyway. Then the next time someone starts rambling about Ben And Arthur, and it's the lowest rated film on IMDb (like that really makes any difference one way or the other) tell them about this monstrosity.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wow....
luicypher832 November 2008
This movie is without a doubt, the single worst piece of trash i have ever watched. I deserve a medal for watching it thru to the end. I felt compelled to create an IMDb account just so i could review this god awful "film". I only watched it out of some morbid curiosity i got from reading other reviews on it... much akin i supposed to wanting to play "Dr. Jeckle and Mr. Hyde" on the NES after watching an AVN review. Knowing it wasn't going to be scary, i thought i could at least get a kick out of how bad it was, but all i got was irate at the fact that i had just wasted 112 minutes of my life watching....nothing. It's minuscule budget would have been better served buying cheeseburgers for fat people and the director and "actor"'s time would have been better spent watching paint dry. Both functions would have been more productive than unleashing this colossal piece of crap upon the world. Summary: It stinks and I hate it.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
a load of rubbish
kingdomofstu721 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I had heard about this, but had never had the opportunity to see it until today. I have seen many films of rather dubious quality, but never something like this. All I can say is: Dear God! What a ghastly load of rubbish this so-called "film" is. Almost two full hours consisting of seven or eight shots. The "music" (and I use these quotes in the loosest possible way) is positively abhorrent. I am not entirely sure who (or what) Mr. Justin French thinks he is, subjecting the public to this ghastly display of cinematic ineptitude. I thank God that I didn't use my hard-earned money to pay for this. This is with out a doubt the worst thing I have ever seen in my life.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What? I mean... what? That's it, I've got nothing to say.
WeYreAoung22 November 2013
I don't know why Justin French, the director of this movie, loves this so much. This is highly a terrible movie with no plot, no horror, no anything, except for this one shot of a knife stabbing the air, a candle lightning up, and a hand being baked in the oven with a red filter over it. How can anyone f*ck up film making this bad?! How can they do this to us? Is this our punishment for not liking low budget home made films? Well forget it this ain't a movie or a horror, well yeah, but it is, it's one hours long, it has the horror genre thrown over the film, it has a serial killer, it has creepy music and suspense, so it IS a horror, just a very bad one. The music sucks, the actors suck, the camera work sucks, everything sucks. FROZEN FLESH SUCKS!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
i've found it boys! the worst of the worst
firstlasty9 March 2021
Throughout my years as a movie buff, i've encountered some of the so called worst movies like Ax' em or feeders or alien blood. some movies that are for masochists like august underground or slaughtered vomit dolls. and since 2017 i've grown a passion for the bottom of the barrel garbage, all thanks to ax' em. then in 2018 i challenged myself to find the worst movie ever made, it took me a month A MONTH to find this "movie". i found it and was appalled by the lowest rating i've ever seen, 1.1! well its 1.0 now but when i discovered it it was at 1.1. now frozen flesh is the worst thing i've ever seen, it makes ax 'em look like halloween , it makes hellroller look like hellraiser. well, onto the very little of a plot there is. a mass murderer, more like a bad freddy krueger wannabe. kills his victims and cooks them. yeah right, it is nothing but still images. i like B movies, SOV horror and other little crappy movies i've seen but this one makes me want to apologize to the movies that i said i hate: EX: jason goes to hell. justin french is the worst director in history. this movie is so bad that it makes me want to give up on being a movie buff.

it is so bad that even the cinema snob would want to quit. this movie is one of the worst if not THE WORST movies ever made. the plot, characters, story, script and direction are all non existent. the effects don't exist,EVEN NUKIE AND AX'EM HAD EFFECTS. and is horrible. damn this movie to hell. this movie is so horrible that i cannot even reccomend it.

-1000/10 avoid at all costs
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
'Frozen Flesh' is the greatest horror film ever made. Period.
frozenfleshcinema18 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I am the creator of 'Frozen Flesh' and I have to say that I am pretty disappointed in my audience. If anyone hates this movie, then he or she should really watch it again, since they probably just didn't get it. Movies are made so that audiences will love and appreciate them. So, if someone doesn't love and appreciate my movie, then something must be wrong with him/her. 'Frozen Flesh' is everything a horror movie should be: suspenseful, terrifying, gory, shocking, etc. The acting is by far the best I think I've ever seen in a movie. The music (composed by myself, of course) will send chills down your spine from sheer terror - one of the most haunting scores ever put to film. The movie will hook you in from the opening shot and you won't be able to pull yourself away from the screen. The performance by Frank Gillis as the chillingly amazing "The Mass Murderer" is something that will be talked about for years to come, trust me on that. I can honestly say that I've probably created the single greatest horror film ever made, bar none. I just hope that you all see that as well...because if you don't, it will be really sad. I agree with every single review of 'Frozen Flesh' that's printed on the DVD cover, not the website critics or the audience members on this site. Again, my opinion is really the only one that matters. If I like it, others should share in my bliss. So, I encourage all of you to search for 'Frozen Flesh' on Google (it's available as a free download on many sites) and check it out. You won't regret it, I promise. And if you do, then watch it again. And again. Until you finally enjoy it. Because 'Frozen Flesh' is not only the most controversial film ever made, it's also the most disturbing and one of the best films ever made. Period.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Warning! May cause headaches, eye strain, or blurred vision.
dylanbaker-8374314 December 2015
I've recently discovered this train wreck of a movie when looking at random lists of bad horror movies. Frozen Flesh, which sounds more like an Eskimo porno caught my attention due to the 1.1 score; therefore, I felt obligated to watch what received such a extremely horrible rating. This is one rare instance that I had to quit watching a horror movie. To put it simply, Frozen Flesh is both pretentious, and uneasy on the eyes with its intense red filter. 10 minutes into the movie I could feel my eyes start to sting; therefore, I decided to stop watching the movie at that point. Apparently, the person responsible for Frozen Flesh thinks that this movie is a masterpiece. More like a masterpiece of sh*t. The bar is set so low that Killjoy could walk over it, but what can you expect from a movie with a 100$ budget.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I enjoyed this flick
PuddinTaine16 July 2009
There is a lot of hate surrounding this movie, but there was also a lot of hate around Taxi Driver upon it's release. Now it's considered a classic.

With such a low rating on IMDb, it hurts one's credibility to say they enjoyed Frozen Flesh, but I couldn't take my eyes off of the screen when I put it on, for all 1 and a half hours or so of it. Justin French certainly has a long career ahead of him after this.

Needless to say, I am eagerly awaiting "Frozen Flesh 3", which unlike most sequels, has a good chance of being even better than the previous films in the series!
1 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed