Whilst a charming concept for a story, I find a number of errors with content. The narrative uses first person perspective, but fails to address the relationship of the narrator within her environment. Yes we are treated to graphic exercises, analogies of her ability to place herself within concurrent space, yet the descriptive necessary to address her sense of alienation is somewhat flawed. She has developed abilities over time but all disabilities are stigmatized, even the slightest glance of a passer by is a daily occurrence for a blind sighted individual, children relish the opportunity to point the finger in wonderment. This approach would have satisfied my understanding of visual impairment. Nevertheless, the cost effective approach of negative imaging works (a green tint would shown a deeper understanding of the subject matter). What is critical about visual style is that in terms of sight, we are all selective, human vision is extraordinary and a hazy peripheral, sharpening and blurring of focus, the presence of unexplained light sources and metaphorical disorientation would indeed represent a short film to be described as 'most excellent.' Content is key, never style over content.