First of all, it's not one of the best. Its comedy was between average and weak considering the other, surely bigger, parties of the wacky fun that we know as "Scrubs".
Dr. Kelso is a funny little guy, but a mean dictator after all. This time, we get to hear his self-narration. Furthermore, "Scrubs" approaches to the matter of the American war in Iraq. Actually, being a debatable matter assures something wrong that the Americans see. And it's so glaring for anyone that knows something about the previous tragedy, or the first swamp, which is called Vietnam. But great part of the Americans are so busy of inner - more urgent - matters, like looking for a flat (as J.D.), or waiting for markdown (like all the hospital's staff).
It managed to show all the possible viewpoints; the anti-war (Dr. Cox, Dr. Turk), the pro-war (Dr. Reid), the one who refuses to adopt an attitude and preferring side on the other (Ted), and the absolute ignorant who doesn't have a viewpoint towards the whole subject or any consciousness about it in the first place (J.D.).
It was smart move to make the forth type as J.D. since he's the lead of the show, or its narrator, which makes him represent the majority of its viewers. But, on the other hand, you'd think for a while that the episode looked exactly like Ted. Just showed all the conflicting parties without any viewpoint for itself!
However, if I supposed that the show was having its own point of view, then what would it be? And hey, why relating Dr. Kelso to the matter of the American war in Iraq mainly? I think the 2 questions got one answer.
If you haven't noticed, Kelso didn't say anything in the current debate. Because all what he wanted was being the leader (So he wouldn't be an appendix!). Hence, he handled his job well, explained his philosophy finely (telling the fresh doctor "You can get attention by being violent, or by being charming."), and ending the episode with his so unfair decision about the scale-down: "Nobody will get any, except me of course". He thinks that he's uniting everyone by giving them one subject to hate; himself. So this can fit as some analysis for bossy boss like Kelso, or a metaphor for George. W. Bush at the moment!
Maybe the show's makers were afraid of declaring a certain viewpoint that may make it lose some viewers, so ratings. Or maybe these very makers are having the same debate without one generally accepted opinion towards the case. But at any rate, "Scrubs" is an intelligent show all along. Thus using Kelso in specific as a parallel line to this matter is conspicuous. And when the episode urges showing him as the leader, who doesn't want to be appendix, clearly uses violence not charm, and takes his own decisions - that serve his very own benefits only - without caring about the people or the consequences, believing that that's the leadership--then I must think about hidden meanings under the surface.
Just relate between the character of the draftee being wounded in the head, losing parts of it in Iraq, and his condition as someone who knows nothing but to hate his sergeant. The thing that unites him with his colleagues is hating someone, not believing in a cause. Because, to tell you the ugly truth, there is no cause from the start. It's their leader's agenda, or - as in Kelso's case - the selfish decisions, not any noble goal. And that's why this poor draftee along with all his colleagues are losing their heads.
Someday, all the defense of Cox and Turk will be proved right. The lies about WMD, the war to win petroleum.. All of that will be uncovered. Kelso wanted to be a leader. And so was Bush. Both are idiot, greedy and hatful persons. The only difference between them is that Kelso is frank about it. That's my viewpoint. I just think that it's the show's as well.
3 out of 9 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
