ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,5/10
10 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA young woman commits a hit-and-run, then finds her fate tied to her victim.A young woman commits a hit-and-run, then finds her fate tied to her victim.A young woman commits a hit-and-run, then finds her fate tied to her victim.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen the Receptionist calls Thomas to his appointment, she mistakenly calls him "Mr. Brado." This suggests that the reason he is not "in the computer" is a clerical error on the part of the job agency.
- GaffesWhen Bardo does hit the windshield, it breaks rather large, jagged pieces. Automotive windshields are made from a laminated safety glass. They do not break in sheets, but instead "spider-web" when they are struck.
- Citations
Rashid: It's got his blood everywhere, look what happened to O.J.
Brandi Boski: Yeah, but didn't O.J. go free?
Rashid: That's not the point!
- Générique farfeluIn the opening credits, the title breaks apart, like glass shattered, mirroring the driving event of the plot). The remainder of the credits look like they have been broken and put back together again, again mirroring a major plot point.
- Autres versionsThere are two versions. The widely available theatrical release clocks in at "1h 25m (85 min)" while the original film festival was "1h 34m (94 min) (Toronto International) (Canada)".
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Worst Whitewashed Movie Roles (2016)
Commentaire en vedette
Truly enjoyable and disturbing!
I thought I would give it ten minutes, no expectations whatsoever, but I found myself completely captivated after five minutes and I had an absolutely pure, simple movie experience, like movies are supposed to be. Simple plot, excellent acting, interesting yet plausible characters. Like a "Fargo" light.
I read in a chat room that Mena Suvari's character was not believable, but I strongly disagree. One of the strengths of the movie was, that despite the lead character's horrid actions, she felt very real; a young, unintelligent woman, who completely lacked any understanding of true values, but who still was convincingly portrayed as a person with a warm heart and an appreciated colleague. I do not know how she pulls it off... just brilliant. Also Stephen Rea was great in every scene, but did not have a very challenging part to play. Not a single scene was too long or too short or unnecessary. Just an exquisite little piece! Truly enjoyable and disturbing!
I read in a chat room that Mena Suvari's character was not believable, but I strongly disagree. One of the strengths of the movie was, that despite the lead character's horrid actions, she felt very real; a young, unintelligent woman, who completely lacked any understanding of true values, but who still was convincingly portrayed as a person with a warm heart and an appreciated colleague. I do not know how she pulls it off... just brilliant. Also Stephen Rea was great in every scene, but did not have a very challenging part to play. Not a single scene was too long or too short or unnecessary. Just an exquisite little piece! Truly enjoyable and disturbing!
utile•207
- UlfSAndersson
- 13 nov. 2008
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Stuck?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 67 505 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 8 844 $ US
- 1 juin 2008
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 151 449 $ US
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant