"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Fallacy (TV Episode 2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Transgender issues!!!!
samratrc141728 January 2007
I am a very big fan of this show and this is one of the most unusual episodes i have ever seen. I personally haven't encountered any person with a gender identity crisis but going by this episode i guess most people in an advanced and open minded country like the USA haven't either. I am not ashamed to say this but i sympathized with the character of Cheryl Avery 100% in-spite of what or who she is. Portrayed very delicately and beautifully by actress Katherine Moennig (oscar winner Gywneth Paltrow's cousin)i understood first hand what issues (mostly problems)people like Cheryl Avery goes through in their lives. Its sad enough that she is who she is because of hormonal imbalances in her body(unfortunately beyond her control) but society seems to have a huge problem accepting the fact that she is at peace with her problem and just cant let her be. People are virulently xenophobic and paranoid to even have an open mind about things they don't know and understand like the situation with Cheryl Avery. Its the truth. I am afraid i cant reveal much about Cheryl's problem without giving away a lot of the story (spoilers) so i must continue referring to her problem by being vague about it. I will certainly be kind and understanding to the Cheryl's i meet in life. This episode has done that to me. And it has a lot to do with the fact that i have fallen in love with Katherine Moennig. She was just incredible.Bravo! SVU. Hope for more episodes like this one.I became an even bigger fan of SVU because of this episode. Keep up the good work!!!
72 out of 89 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mistaken beliefs
TheLittleSongbird22 October 2020
Out of all of the topics that Season 4 of 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit', and the whole show in general actually come to think of it, "Fallacy's" is one of the bravest, yet also controversial, ones and actually even more relevant today than it was back then (despite more knowledge the ignorance is still there unfortunately today). Never have had a problem for such increasingly misunderstood people and actually don't really understand why there are others that do, and they deserve every ounce of happiness and acceptance.

"Fallacy" does a great job with this very difficult subject. It must have been a real challenge addressing this topic, due to how well or not it would go down, but "Fallacy" handles it with a lot of honesty and delicacy. Cannot disagree more with anybody that says that it shoves political views down the throats and feel personally that it is not particularly sensitive to say that. Is this episode one of my favourites of Season 4? Not quite, but to me it has always been a truly admirable and exceptionally well done episode and deserves a big Grade A effort for even trying tackling an issue that so many have been and still are ignorant of.

Did find myself somewhat annoyed by Stabler's attitude towards Cheryl, it did strike me as rather unsympathetic (and fans do know from episodes before and since that he can be sympathetic) and somewhat ignorant. That was my only real issue actually about "Fallacy".

So much is done right. The production values are slick and professional, not ever resorting to cheap or untested gimmicks or anything. The music is haunting in the right places and isn't constant or too loud, and the direction gives the drama urgency and breathing space.

The script provokes a lot of thought, especially in the whole conflict with whether to see Cheryl through law as a man and a woman (which will, and most probably still does, be a cause for debate), and doesn't ramble. The story is very interesting throughout and moved me too quite a bit, there is one significant and shocking event part-way through that many, including myself, are likely to wish to have a not bad outcome. It isn't obvious either, can think of at least three parts that shocked me, and it is not confusing. The episode did not have an easy subject to cover and it covered it actually with honesty and tact, personally didn't see the shoving down people's throat vibe others got.

All the regulars are terrific, namely Mariska Hargitay as the most understanding and sympathetic of the team members here. The truly moving and courageous performance of Katherine Moennig as a complex character also stands out in a major way. The ending did shock and sadden me.

Overall, great. 9/10
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good story, brilliant performances
akicork22 April 2023
Often SVU episodes focus on one or other of the detectives: here the episode clearly belongs to Kate Moennig as Cheryl Avery. Her heart-rending performance really gripped me (as do most of her appearances - I confess to being a Kate Moennig fan!). Her skill is maybe not surprising, coming from such a theatrical family. We have had a few episodes where the theme is the failure of the law to keep up with advances in scientific techniques. Here we have an episode where the law is failing to keep up with social norms. "The System" currently expects people to be one of two genders., and hasn't yet caught up with reality since Edward II of England had a relationship with Piers Gaveston, 700 years ago. Society is changing faster than it used to, and the law needs to pick up its skirts and work out how to catch up.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A permanent victim
bkoganbing28 October 2013
Transgender issues are explained and sad to say exploited in this particular SVU episode. Despite a beautiful performance by Katherine Moennig as the tragic and troubled transgender woman, the story is flawed with characters that have mixed motives.

Moennig who has become the girlfriend of Chad Lindberg without revealing her physical nature is assaulted by Lindberg's brother at a party where the brother is then killed. Moennig is charged with his murder.

It becomes clear that she's the victim more than a perpetrator any way you slice it. I'm not at all agreeing with the decision that Stephanie March made in charging Moennig, but then there would be no story.

Then there's Michael Lerner who's a noted criminal attorney who takes the case because it's a headline maker. March is concerned about his motivations, but her own conduct is in question for me.

In the end there's no relief in sight for Moennig who seems destined to be a victim of all around her including law enforcement. The story is clearly borrowed from Boys Don't Cry.

But it's not nearly as well made.
18 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed