"Law & Order" Disciple (TV Episode 1999) Poster

(TV Series)

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Doubt
TheLittleSongbird29 September 2021
One can tell from the plot synopsis and even the title that "Disciple" was not going to be an easy watch, quite the opposite. Also if one knows of the original 'Law and Order's', and the 'Law and Order' franchise's, reputation of exploring heavy topics in an uncompromising way. It was certainly of no surprise to me that this was not going to be an easy watch, especially as the show and some other shows had episodes with a similar feel, even when the subject was not the same.

"Disciple" is another very good episode of 'Law and Order' and of Season 9. It is not one of the best outings from Season 9 (nor is it one of the worst), but although there are imperfections there are many truly excellent qualities as well with "Disciple". The subject matter is not easy and any case where religion plays a large part in it has potential traps (as bringing religion into discussing heavy topics can be touchy territory), but although not executed perfectly "Disciple's" handling of it was better than expected.

Like some 'Law and Order' episodes around this point, "Disciple" is a little on the routine side to begin with.

Also felt that while the sentiment was completely understandable and agreed with the whole not wanting the perpetrator out on the streets part was on the heavy handed side.

Everything else is very strong. On a visual level, the episode is solid and the intimacy of the photography doesn't get static or too filmed play-like. The music when used is not too over-emphatic and has a melancholic edge that is quite haunting. The direction is sympathetic enough without being leaden, while having enough momentum to make the drama sing in its atmosphere. The acting is very good, especially in the legal scenes. Frances Conroy definitely unsettles.

Script is tight and has always made me think long and hard after (most 'Law and Order' episodes do), with grit, class and tact. The story is absorbing and hard hitting, with an unforgettable cross examination scene (one of McCoy's greatest). The moral dilemmas of the case are handled very thoughtfully and despite the danger of doing so the religious element of the story isn't shoved too much down the throat.

In summary, very good. 8/10.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
To doubt your own doubts
bkoganbing22 November 2015
One of the things that was a constant for the years that Sam Waterston was a regular there was his lapsed Catholicism. He made no secret that he repudiated what he learned in parochial school and he seemed to really enjoy going after religious hustlers.

Now he has a case that truly challenges his own non-beliefs. A young hyperactive adolescent is brought to a hospital by Mel Rodriguez and she dies while in the waiting area of the emergency room and Rodriguez who is a retarded individual books.

When Rodriguez is located the trail leads to Frances Conroy who many consider an urban saint. She is a drop out from a convent, preferring to do things her way. What she was doing was conducting an unauthorized exorcism and the child died as a result of the injuries.

Conroy goes on trial for criminally negligent homicide and the picture that is brought out by her lawyer Wendell Pierce is a selflessly dedicated woman who takes no money for her services, such a contrast to all those pompadoured reverends shamelessly asking for coin on every broadcast. I even wondered how she paid her rent.

Like Joan Of Arc she hears voices, like the Maid of Orleans the specific voice of St. Michael. Waterston never crossexamined a defendant like her before or after in his tenure with the show. It reminded me of Michael Clarke Duncan's character in The Green Mile, a simple selfless soul with great gifts. Somewhere in the human community you like to think there are such as these.

If Waterston felt like the Bishop of Cauchon after it was all over you could hardly blame him.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Caedite Omnes.
rmax3048232 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A woman is stressed out by her hyperactive teen-aged daughter, having lost two jobs, being punched in the nose, and unable to find help or respite anywhere. So she brings her daughter to an ex nun who performs an exorcism ritual and manages to kill the kid.

It's a conundrum. The mother pleads to manslaughter but it seems hardly her fault, since she was driven to distraction and wasn't present when the accidental death took place. On the stand, she's very convincing.

And the ex nun is practically a paragon of selflessness, devoting her life and its skimpy resources to helping the homeless and the poor with no assistance from outside. She claims that all her activities were guided by the voice of St. Michael the Archangel, who acted as a messenger between her and God. She's convincing too. She's play by Frances Conroy, who has plain and undistinguished features.

It's all twisted and it puts the DA's office into an avoidance/avoidance conflict, which leads to a laughable exchange.

Angie Harmon: I don't want that woman on the street killing any more children.

Sam Waterston: And I don't feel like challenging this woman's religious beliefs on the stand.

Steven Hill: Alright. Split the difference. Prove that a saint committed murder.

Of course the subject is serious enough. Suppose a religious culture demands that an adulteress be stoned to death. Is that more justified than an accidental death during a curing ritual, or worse? How about Joan of Arc? How about ANY case in which an attempt to do good results in a bad outcome?
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A must watch for Frances Conroy's scenes.
m-4782618 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I've been a fan of hers since I saw her on Six Feet Under, and thought this role in particular, was tailor made for her. In « Disciple » she played a former nun who practiced an exorcism on a troubled teen. I admit that I was surprised by the jury's sentence and McCoy's position and empathy. I was expecting those guilty charges, but never saw her as a cold blooded murderer either. What she did was wrong and irresponsible, but it was done without malicious intentions, through what seemed to be temporary insanity. So why didn't they simply commit her? Carmichael's cold demeanor worked to her disadvantage. It made her look insensitive, but I can live with that.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed