It's Winter (2006) Poster

(2006)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Bleak yet beautiful
doubleme14 February 2009
A beautiful film that tells an emotionally complex story of alienation and longing with the minimum of dialogue.

That is all I wanted to say really, but it seems brevity is not a virtue sort by IMDb. I understand the ten line minimum; IMDb does not want to be overwhelmed by vacuous one line reviews. But surly my well chosen 18 words are a triumph of economy and concision, and through these excellent qualities are exempt to such a well meaning yet indiscriminate prohibition. Furthermore there can be little danger of "It's Winter" being overwhelmed by reviews of any sort... My vain blathering seem to have taken me over the quota...
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unreassuringly bleak
Chris_Docker13 August 2006
A bleak vision in a bleak environment, It's Winter gets determinedly bleaker like the onset of the cruelest season. An Iranian filmmaker who trained in London, Rafi Pitts tells a story of the barrenness of trying to scrape together an existence in an unforgiving modern world. Set in Tehran among an impoverished underclass, the lives of two men are overlapped in a fatalistic way that is reminiscent of the themes of Abel Ferrara (of whom Pitts once made a documentary): when things are really cr*p, they will generally get much worse. When the road ahead is unwelcoming and the snow is freezing, what else do you do but hunker down in our collar? Imagine trying to philosophise with someone in such a situation - their bottom line is not your ideas but whether you can put bread in their mouth.

Mokhtar, unable to find work, leaves his wife and child to find employment in more distant lands. After seeing him on to a train we pick up with another man, Marhab, at the end of his journey. The dislocation is such that it takes a while to realise that Marhab has arrived in the same area that Mokhtar has just left. Marhab is also struggling to find and keep work, but still manages to get married in a short space of time - to Mokhtar's wife (whose former husband is believed dead).

Whatever joy there is in these people's lives is consigned almost to a footnote. We are not given the excuse to believe they are really OK because they can enjoy the odd cup of soup. Such a false projection of happiness would let us off the hook too easily, whereas the reality of the such people in modern day Iran is all too realistically portrayed. An ingenious and very nihilistic coda rams home the message that there is little to look forward to - even less than hope might suggest.

Set against the austere and unwelcoming environment is a haunting and exotic song whose words mirror both the opening scenes and the sense of isolation. "They won't answer your greeting for their heads are lowered into their collars . . . for the cold is too bitter, too harsh." As well as providing a themic beauty that rises above all we see, the song maybe lends a useful insight for Westerners. Because of its strategic position, Iran (Persia) has always been the target of political machinations, but its long history had for many years - longer than many civilisations - held the promise of colourful mysteries, ancient civilisations and inexplicable ways. The latter has gradually been eroded, but the former still holds true, the present world forces being one of 'encouraging democratisation,' poverty-increasing sanctions, and demonisation as a hotbed of terrorism. Yet it is not incumbent on Iran to understand western values (except for its own survival) - it is for the West, with greater resources at its disposal, to understand Iran. Although non-political, this frosty window into a country that has become almost closed to Western eyes, easily conveys the futility of winning hearts and minds through rhetoric. In purely cinematic terms, it has a quiet, stark beauty and a fragility of construction as one character unknowingly supplants another, only to repeat a cycle that has as its end in unthinkable personal despair. It is a style that is not easy to relate to but one that is as fresh and crisp as anything that has come out of land that cinema has sometimes almost forgotten.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's Winter
MartinTeller30 December 2011
I did deliberately choose to watch this on the same night as MAN PUSH CART, since they sounded similar in plot, style and tone. Marhab is a mechanic looking for work in Tehran. He becomes fascinated with a woman whose husband has just left Tehran (on the same train Marhab arrived in) to look for work elsewhere. The film tracks their struggles over the course of a year, from winter to winter, suggesting the cyclical nature of life is much like the changing seasons. What goes up, must come down... Marhab befriends another mechanic who finds him a job, but problems soon develop. Things change, only return to their previous state, or a revamped version of it. Although bleak (like the dirge that recurs on the soundtrack), the mood is not entirely dour. The protagonist is impulsive and free-spirited, which often leads to conflict, but also provides him with joy and triumph. He's an interesting, complex character, done very well by Ali Nicksaulat. Pitts frames the dingy landscape delicately, finding beauty amidst the grime. There are also some intriguing editing/scripting choices, leaving out key transitional moments, allowing the viewer to fill in the blanks while concentrating on the emotional framework. A delicate, resonant film. Iran continues to live up to its reputation as a wellspring of interesting filmmakers. I will be checking out more by Rafi Pitts.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
bleakness and hope
cliffhanley_11 February 2007
This is perhaps as close to the Italian NeoRealists of the Fifties as the Iranian New Wave has yet got. Its low-life milieu, the struggle for survival in the big city, the impartial cruelty of fate, all these elements are strangely comforting to any aficionado of the post-war shakeup, although any sense of comfort is at odds with the barren cold of Tehran in the dark months.

The director took the scenario rather than a literal narrative, from a book, 'Safar' (The Trip) by Mahmoud Dowlatabadi, and much of the colour from a poem, 'Winter', by Mehdi Akhavan Saless. The poetry acts well as a framing device, pulling the story closer together as an iconic statement instead of a collection of interconnected images.

Khatoun (Mitra Hajjar) is left with a granny and daughter to keep while her husband (Hashem Abdi) leaves on the train to seek work; simultaneously another man, Marhab (a Brando-esquire Ali Nicksaulat) also looking for Something Better, arrives. He falls in love with Khatoun, strikes up a friendship with Ali, (Said Orkani) a mechanic and small-time pimp, finds work, but as this is intended to be a reflection of real life, where the bus will not necessarily come just because there hasn't been one for an hour, nothing is that simple - life is shaped by an accumulation of little accidents, and if anything changes it will not be where it was expected. The constant in this story is Khatoun: the men are blown around her like snowflakes as they strive to survive. Pitts has said that he feels men seem to live more in a dream world, while making the decisions, but the women have to deal with the facts. When it came to shooting he describes his technique as setting the circumstance for a particular actor or 'non-actor' to slip into one piece of action and then capturing the magic.It works well, and added to that are the particular aesthetics of the snowy landscapes, the medina and the rusty, funky garage heaps. He wanted to create an Iran that was timeless - it's more than that - it could be anywhere, too. And bleak though it may be, it is not unremittingly so. After everything there remains a little hope. CLIFF HANLEY
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Social Relevance
norman-42-84375813 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
It's Winter and life is hard in south Tehran, especially when through the quirks of fate, you find yourself at the bottom of the pile and those above you take pleasure in kicking you off the end of the social ladder just because they can. It's a tale of hard working without the expected rewards; of not being able to quit and loose the little you have in order to survive. It is a tale of desperation and not knowing what to do next; of the other man's grass always being greener and history repeating itself on the merry go round of despair.

Others here have faithfully and excellently reviewed the content of the film. What interested me more in this particular case, was how accurate this film was of life within one of the richest oil states in the world. Does this state of affairs really exist when President Ahmadinejad stands before the United Nations and berates the Unites States for its lack of fair play. There are not that many sources of information on the day to day life of ordinary Iranians. One that I turned to was the documentary "Rageh inside Iran". Early in this documentary, Rageh asks his Iranian friend a similar question and receives the following reply. "There is lots of money in this city but it is not shared in a fair way, some people are so poor they crash themselves to the wall. One in seven Iranians live below the poverty line of less than one dollar per day. Ahmadinejad promised them a share in the oil wealth but they are still waiting."

After visiting glitzy shopping malls in the north of the city and talking to both ordinary Iranian people and some self made business women, Rageh befriends a taxi driver and in a private conversation asks what life for the young is like in Tehran. The reply is quite illuminating.

"You have to be cautious in Tehran now, you can't trust many people here. You should be careful choosing your friends and the people you do business with. If you try to live an upright life you will make many enemies who make plans against your money or your life. You might find someone is interfering with your business and you loose out. You could loose your job, your livelihood; you could be framed for a crime, you have to watch yourself." When pressed about whether this is a recent problem or a governmental failure he answers in the following way. "The population is increasing, there is unemployment amongst young people and poverty creates prostitution. The government could do a lot of things to help young people, they could make it easier but it is a fact that kids are turned out into the streets and are exploited in sweat shops."

Rafi Pits has said that men are the dreamers and it is the women who are left to deal with the practicalities of life. In Iranian society, though, there is an ambivalence towards women. Some have been successful in making a career for themselves and the official line is one of equality. Many young women talked freely when interviewed as a group in the shopping mall however there were occasions when asked a direct question in front of their men or male colleagues they seemed confused as to how they should answer. Another aspect of this is that since the form of government is a theocracy, to question a political decision is to question God and this is simply not on. For example the official line is one of gender equality however women are forbidden from riding motor cycles but you may not publicly say this. Instead you must say that only men ride motor cycles which implies it is a matter of choice by women not to ride them. A further complication is that the administration wants to make all creative works, writing; art and film making positive towards Islam. This gives film directors a problem of finding a self regulating line of truth without criticism. Thus making a film of the harsh conditions in the dilapidated south without counterbalancing it with a view of the prosperous north is a fine balancing act. Towards the end of the film, Marhab asks all the right questions without providing any of the difficult answers. Here is some dialog.

"What's the point. To know a trade and be unemployed – what's the point." "I've worked all my life, I'm a technician, I can fix anything – I'm a mechanic I will repair anything, why go through all this trouble". "But I don't like to work, well sometimes, not always. I prefer a good time. Too much work ruins you. Am I right? It's obvious, especially if you are not given your rights and no one is there to see it". After all the work why are you still here? I was just beginning to settle down after a rough, homeless, restless life. The bastards won't let me".

Was this little tirade directed against the administration or his employers. It is so hard to say and that's where the permitted ambivalence comes into play.

This is a film which highlights the problems without providing any of the answers and is probably as far as Rafi Pits thought he could go.

With Iran's administration preferring to trade its oil wealth with its friends in the east but this depending on the construction of major pipelines it may take a little time for the problems outlined in It's Winter to become eradicated.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One Magic Moment
two-rivers13 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"Zemestan" ("It is Winter"), one of the two Iranian movies in this year's competition section of the Berlin Film Festival, certainly did not satisfy everybody of those who were around to see it and did not win any of the major prizes either. That was, in my opinion, only partly due to the film's pessimistic undertones. To a much higher extent this negative reception should be explained by the fact that mainstream viewers and critics are still not familiarized enough with the essence of Iranian film-making and therefore unable to fully grasp the value of certain techniques which are typical for this kind of cinema.

For example, the correspondent of Spain's principal newspaper EL PAIS, after having complained about the apparent lack of "swiftness" of the movie, even went a step further and denounced "this endogamous style of a certain type of Iranian cinema which pretends that ellipses or silences are worth more than a thousand words." But is this really all that bad? Or is it not, on the contrary, an artistic achievement of the highest value? An achievement which can best be understood in that memorable "two-second-scene of happiness". But for those who haven't seen the film or don't remember it well enough, I might just recap the storyline a little bit.

It's all about the current situation of the Iranian underclass, where people find it difficult to find work and position themselves in life. Same problem as elsewhere, we might say. But here conditions seem to be particularly crude: It is winter, and the world presents itself just as that, a cold and inhospitable place. A father of a small family has lost his job and emigrates to another country, leaving his wife and little daughter behind. He does not come back, does not write any letters, nor does he send any money – his mission seems to have turned out to be a complete failure. A migrant worker arrives from the North, looking for some work as a car mechanic, but here in the South conditions are equally bad. And still, he somehow manages to find a small job which is poorly paid. He is without a woman, a situation which in Iranian society apparently is particularly despised and placed little value on. He meets the emigrant's wife, finds out that this woman lives alone with her daughter and concludes that she must be a widow. He tries to court her, but she is not an easy prey.

Then, suddenly, the magic moment arrives. You can see that they are talking together in a friendly way, from afar, without being able to hear what they are saying. The scene barely lasts two or three seconds, and then, in the next scene we are already at the registry office, but we see nothing more than the corridor. For another two seconds.

Of course, it is not necessary to be told any more than this. All the rest wondrously develops in your mind. Every spectator can invent his own version of how the two fall in love. And we remember: the same happens or happened in plenty of other Iranian movies which have been acclaimed in the past. Just take Kiarostami's unforgettable "Through the Olive Trees" where cinematographic proceedings present themselves in an even more radical way, for not only don't we witness the moment of love between the two protagonists, we don't know either if a love scene has taken place at all. Therefore we become the most autonomous spectator possible, creating our own film ending, just as we think befitting.

In "Zemestan", as we have seen, the time of happiness is cut away almost entirely. What remains are ninety minutes of sadness and sorrow. A sadness that inexorably gains the upper hand over the happiness. The mechanic also loses his jobs and considers emigrating. That's when suddenly the ex-husband returns, walking on crutches, having lost a leg. He does not enter his old house, does not want to reveal his misfortune. He dies before having uttered a single word. The new husband, on the other hand, finally recoils from taking the train that could have taken him to a new destiny. He stays behind, lost in the white immensity of snow, pitiless reflection of a cold and uncaring universe. It's winter, definitely.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Despite the good things - dull
jeremy-liebster-17 December 2007
I wanted to like this film I really did. For me it had the perfect ingredients - it was from a country I knew relatively little about, it was bleak and gritty and the actors were almost frighteningly believable. What's more the cinematography and direction were impressive - I loved the beautiful scenery and the contrasts with the grim realities of urban Iran. The problem was that it was just so so slow. I didn't want an action film; I love thoughtful, quiet films but at one point I was almost begging the writer to give us something, anything, just to maintain a flicker of interest and stop us falling asleep. There was almost no conversation and that which there was I found dull and awkward. I can honestly say that without exaggeration I was utterly stunned when the film finished and my DVD player stated clearly that it had been running for less than 90 minutes. It was genuinely so painfully slow that it seemed to have been running for 3 hours or more. To this day I swear that my DVD player was playing tricks on me....
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Long ...
kosmasp22 April 2007
... but not overdue. I was curious to why people here on IMDb loved this movie more than me so I read another review that held this movie high. I respect his view and his vote, but on the other side I can say: Do I have to know the Iranian way of film-making? And what does that even mean? The other Iranian contender at the International Berlin Film Festival was much better, at least one of the top five movies there.

Funnily enough the other movie wasn't well received in Iran (look for the movie "Offside" here on IMDb). But let's concentrate on this movie. The idea of showing a poor country and how people cope with that, is a good one. And thus it's a shame, that there is not a better film here to review. Do you have to make a pessimistic situation more depressing? Do you have to show long dull shots of nothing happening? (that's a tricky one, because I do think that you might need this at least once or twice, but not make the whole movie feel like it's saying nothing ... if you want a "silent" movie that says something, go and watch "Bin-Jip", a masterpiece with little to none dialogue). Is it really a good statement from the director, that he doesn't show us a dialogue here and there (instead opting for long shots, often also showing nothing)? A tragic situation does need to be emphasized (nor does a dull moment, of which there are quite a few here)! Letting the main character repeatedly talking about the same thing, without him doing it, is beyond the point of tolerability.

The movie feels overbearing and pretentious, but I can only speak for myself, when I say that I wouldn't recommend this movie at all.
4 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed